Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Meechai defends PM’s 4-question plan

 

IMG_1746.jpg

 

BANGKOK: -- Constitution Drafting Committee chairman Meechai Ruchupan voiced his support for Prime Minister Prayut Chan-ocha’s plea for the public to send their feedback to his four questions, defending that the idea was intended to make use of the feedback in the drafting of organic laws.

 

He defended that the idea which was announced by the prime minister last Friday during his weekly address was not intended to pave the way the military junta to stay longer in the office as misinterpreted by politicians and other critics.

 

Regarding the question about whether “undesirable” politicians should be allowed into politics, Meechai explained that public feedback to this question would give a clue to lawmakers to draft bill to meet the people’s wish concerning “undesirable” politicians.

 

He stressed the need of public participation in the drafting of bills.

 

Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/meechai-defends-pms-4-question-plan/

 
thaipbs_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2017-05-30
Posted

Embarrassing really. Thailand seems to churn out unscrupulous politicians to the man on almost every side.

It would appear that the main aim of any / all politician is to find a way to fill their boots (so to speak) once given the keys to power.

And the current lot. Rajabakti park, hawaiigate, submarines etc etc

Posted

What a stupid question it is... "should undesirable politicians be allowed into politics".

"Undesirable" anythings, be they politicians or Generals are by definition unwanted.

So the answer can only be no.

But, "should politicians be allowed into politics" - the answer is of course yes.

 

How about "should undesirable Generals be allowed in the military?"

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, webfact said:

He stressed the need of public participation in the drafting of bills.

huh ? they have acted exactly the opposite for the past 3 years

Posted

Meechai explained that public feedback to this question would give a clue to lawmakers to draft bill to meet the people’s wish concerning “undesirable” politicians.
 

"Undesirable" is a dog-whistle for red-shirts, in case anyone is new here. 

 

"Everyone who wants free, fair and open elections take one step forward, not so fast you red-shirts."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...