Jump to content

NCPO uses Article 44 to grant more time for notifying waterway encroachment


webfact

Recommended Posts

NCPO uses Article 44 to grant more time for notifying waterway encroachment
By The Nation

 

e5c414c785b69955843e2cc2e3dffaf5.jpeg

 

BANGKOK: -- The National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) has allowed an additional 60 days for the notification of waterway encroachment, by exercising the special powers granted to it under Article 44 of the interim charter.

 

Lt-General Sansern Kaewkamnerd, the government spokesman, said on Tuesday that after an NCPO meeting, the government had decided to extend the time stated under the Navigation in Thai Waters Act for people to notify the authorities of their waterway encroachment.

 

NCPO order 32/2560 has therefore been issued to solve problems in enforcing the new law.

 

“The people will have 60 more days to inform officials about their encroachment, and during this period they will not be punished or fined. The government also extends by 180 days the time in which officials must consider whether to grant permission for each encroaching structure,” Sansern said.

 

He added that for waterway encroachment prior to 1973 in Bangkok, Nonthaburi and Samut Prakan, owners would have to notify officials to get their the structure legalised, but encroaching structures that were constructed after 1972 would be considered first as to whether the owners would be allowed to keep them or have them demolished.

 

The spokesman said the criteria for consideration for these post-1972 structures would be the impact of the structure on navigation and the environment, the necessity of the structure, and legal issues as per city-planning law.

 

No new waterway encroachment would be allowed, except for public structures, Sansern stressed.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/news/national/30319931

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2017-07-05
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting  turn !  But  if  the picture posted  is a sample  of  reality  then it would  have  to asked: What  waterway? And  understandable  that  it is  an invasion  not  limited  to  shanty dwellings  as  an be seen in  other  places. This  looks  like   commercial  ventures  invading  a public  waterway  in  blatant  fashion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...