Jump to content



Police launch campaign against social media posts with celebrities encouraging alcohol use


webfact

Recommended Posts

Police launch campaign against social media posts with celebrities encouraging alcohol use

By Suriya Patathayo 
The Nation

 

0ef02bd3234e8188a60472e170a1f8cf.jpeg

Photo from: www.list25.com

 

BANGKOK: -- Police will monitor Thai social media to punish any actors, “net idols”, or celebrities who pose messages and pictures inviting others to drink alcoholic beverages. There is a fine of Bt50,000-Bt200,000 for publicly encouraging alcohol consumption under the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
 

Regional police officers were instructed in a videoconference with high-ranking officials to monitor and proceed with legal actions against people who make posts promoting drinking.

 

Speaking from Royal Thai Police headquarters, national police chief advisor, Pol General Weerachai Songmetta, noted that five Nonthaburi-based celebrities who posed with alcoholic drinks to encourage others to consume booze had been investigated.

 

He said that he knows other famous people are doing the same and warns that they should remove their posts from all social media channels before police gather evidence and take action against them.

 

Weerachai said police must reintroduce this measure because of the growing use of online media as an advertising channel inviting people to drink.

 

Dr Nipon Chinanonwet, director of the Office of Alcohol Control Committee, joined Weerachai in the videoconference. 

 

A recent study found that approximately 30 per cent of people studied started to drink alcohol after seeing images of their favourite celebrities posed with drinks.

 

Police would punish first-time offenders with a Bt50,000 fine and repeat offenders with a Bt200,000 fine, Weerachai said. Those providing information leading to an arrest would get one-fourth of the fine money as a reward, he added.

 

Weerachai also reported that alcoholic beverage control measures taken by police during Asarnha Puja Day and Buddhist Lent Day had seen a drop in the number of shop owners illegally selling alcoholic drinks. A police operation in six provinces had searched 151 shops and found only 14 violations of the law.

 

Section 32 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act bans anyone from advertising alcoholic drinks and from showing the names and logos of alcoholic drinks to promote them. The law made headlines in 2015 when health activists called on authorities to investigate a beer company's alleged social-media campaign. The campaign featured seven celebrities, including Pakorn "Dome" Lam and Virithipa "VJ Woonsen" Pakdeeprasong, posting images of themselves with bottles of the brew. 

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30321288

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2017-07-20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

And what about Police Lt. General Sanit Mahathavorn who is also a member of parliament who receives 600,000 baht per year from the alcohol producing companies. Marketing and sales promotion advice and "services" he gives perhaps?

So it is confirmed yet again there is a different set of rules and laws for parliamentarians and government officials than there is for the Thai civilian population.

This place is going from bad to worse.

Edited by Cadbury
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, YetAnother said:

"This place is going from bad to worse."

And they do not know it

It depends, if this is a a way to block advertisement like celebrities drinking Chang with clearly visible bottles, then i can understand it. There have been advertising campaigns done by celebrities over social media to get around the alcohol promotion laws. Because as mentioned in the past brewers have used social media this way for advertisements to get around the ban.

 

If this is about just showing a glass of beer but no brands then I agree with you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, robblok said:

It depends, if this is a a way to block advertisement like celebrities drinking Chang with clearly visible bottles, then i can understand it. There have been advertising campaigns done by celebrities over social media to get around the alcohol promotion laws. Because as mentioned in the past brewers have used social media this way for advertisements to get around the ban.

 

If this is about just showing a glass of beer but no brands then I agree with you. 

Agreed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's look at it this way.

 

Every fool knows that tobacco (or alchool in excess)  is bad and can lead, for the latter, to social and mental degeneration.

 

Yet people (like me) smoke (and enjoy a good bourbon with Pepsi, ice and lemon, here and there:burp:

 

The payback in taxes, jobs etc. benefits public coffers and many political parties through discreet and occult tobacco (or alchool) lobby funding and support.

 

Nevertheless and despite the issues, to save face, western governance are on a non stop quest in binding, stringent and sometimes grotesque laws against tobacco (or alchool) and their relative industries. 

 

So why would Thailand not do the same?

Edited by observer90210
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"encourage others to consume booze had been investigated."

"the growing use of online media as an advertising channel inviting people to drink."

 

As an attorney I would have to have the court prove that they were encouraging others to consume booze, and prove they were inviting people to drink. What would be the benefit of these people encouraging others to drink?

Is having a toast encouraging others to drink? This is nothing short of ludicrous!

Here is a post from last weekend, is there an implied "come join us"? LOL! (aka inviting others to drink) None of this makes any sense.

Must be a language gap it's so insane. What would happen if I happened to see someone famous having a drink and I posted it on social media, would I be encouraging others to drink or would it be a "look who I saw today" kind of thing.

This is asking for trouble and defamation law suits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are not a celebrity then it's okay. Who decides who is a celebrity for the purpose of this law? How do you get celebrity status and how can it be relinquished?

could be plenty of opportunity here for some tea money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a substance (like alcohol) is legal to sell and drink

why would a photo or video of consuming it be illegal

 

I'm not a lawyer but to me it seems like an easy charge

to confront and beat in an open court of law, even if

there is a "catch 22" law that says "photo or video of

consuming" is illegal, showing and presenting a case

against the validity and/or prosecution of such a law

or offense would be easy, common sense wise

 

Even the "monkey see, monkey do" theory would not

hold water or suffice against the right legal argument.

This law seems perfect for judiciary to make lots of

money off the backs of celebs ... IMO it's stupid,

ridiculous and unreasonable,. which makes it nothing

more than a miscarriage of justice ... a money maker

for state/country/judiciary at the expense of the

maligned

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, carken said:

 

I'm not a lawyer but to me it seems like an easy charge

to confront and beat in an open court of law, even if

there is a "catch 22" law that says "photo or video of

consuming" is illegal, showing and presenting a case

against the validity and/or prosecution of such a law

or offense would be easy, common sense wise

 

Ah.... you no understand.... Thailand have catch 44 law law now ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you define who is an "actor, “net idol”, or celebrities"? 

 

 

Bring back underboobs, far better than seeing some celeb drinking.

 

Maybe they should ban celebs altogether, most seem to be a bad influence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, JRUSA said:

I have a very important question... Do I need a work permit to be a snitch, and do I have to pay taxes on my snitching income???

After you snitch you will be punished for working without a work permit. Pay fine, and not receiving the reward

 

Then you can sue the other party for defamation.

Edited by 11223344
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.