Jump to content

Case of fake export deals


webfact

Recommended Posts

Case of fake export deals

By THE NATION

 

8f4d3a0a4645810e3d7184fb44297d1d.jpg

Boonsong

 

BANGKOK: -- THE STORY of the Yingluck Shinawatra government’s rice-pledging scheme and its politics appears to be entering its final chapter with the Supreme Court due to deliver on August 25 its verdict on alleged wrongdoing committed by the former premier.


In hindsight, it was clear the previous government, deliberately or not, had created a big loophole while implementing the largest rice-pledging scheme in Thai history. The programme was widely popular among the 15 million farmers and their family members nationwide, as the government’s rice-pledging price of Bt15,000 per tonne was nearly double the then-prevailing market price.

 

This meant nearly 40 million tonnes of rice were offered by farmers and went into warehouses leased by the government. The huge inventory pressured the government to resort to government-to-government (G-to-G) export deals to lower the burden of holding on to excess stock – but those deals turned out to be bogus.

 

For example, the Thai government entered into four export deals with Guangdong Stationery and Sporting Goods Import and Export Corp (GSSG) and Hainan Grain and Oil Industrial Trading Co (Hainan). The first deal with GSSG covered two million tonnes of old rice worth Bt18 billion while the second deal covered two million tonnes of new rice worth Bt28.9 billion.

 

The third deal with GSSG covered another 2.3 million tonnes worth over Bt20 billion while the fourth deal with Hainan was worth Bt847 million.

 

After the government announced these G-to-G deals, opposition Democrat MP Warong Dejkitvikom questioned them, raising the issue in Parliament of whether they were fake, while the Yingluck government was implementing the rice-pledging scheme.

 

The Yingluck government stumbled after Warong discovered that there was no record of big rice shipments to China as announced. The deals signed with GSSG and Hainan were not valid because G-to-G rice exports are possible only via China’s COFCO Corporation.

 

Later, Warong submitted documents to the National Anti-Corruption Commission to substantiate his accusation that the Yingluck government had announced fake G-To-G deals. One piece of crucial evidence is that the bank account of the Department of Foreign Trade, which was supposed to show income from G-to-G export sales, had an inflow of funds originating in Thailand.

 

b5039ea53dae2ad07013430d2d5f3bc5.jpg

 

That was highly unusual, prompting the anti-graft agency to launch its investigation into complaints that some private firms had benefited from these bogus deals. Later it was found that, contrary to the government’s announcement, there had been no rice exports to China. Former commerce minister Boonsong Teriyapirom and 15 others were charged with faking G-to-G export deals.

 

Banking and financial documents show that the money paid for the bogus rice deals mainly came from those associated with rice trading firm Siam Indiga Co, including an aide of former Pheu Thai MP Rapeephun Pongruangrong, as well as Nimol Rakdee, an aide of Apichart Chansakulporn, founder of Siam Indiga.

 

Authorities later seized assets totalling Bt7 billion which belonged to Apichart, Siam Indiga and related persons. The firm’s founder is now serving a six-year jail term for embezzlement due to the loss of a government-owned rice shipment previously sold to Iran.

 

The investigation also alleged that former commerce minister Boonsong and others were had committed wrongdoing by facilitating the fake G-to-G deals to allow some private firms to get government-owned rice at a low price for re-export by Siam Indiga and other firms at a big profit. This resulted in financial damage of over Bt20 billion to the state. Boonsong and others will also face a Supreme Court verdict on these alleged wrongdoings on August 25. The government has also pursued a civil compensation lawsuit against them.

 

Siam Indiga Co’s Apichart, who is better known as Sia Pieng, started out in the rice trading business via another firm, President Agri-Trading Co, and later became the country’s biggest rice exporter during the tenure of former premier Thaksin Shinawatra, the elder brother of Yingluck. 

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/politics/30324486

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2017-08-22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"But, but we were elected, doesn't that mean we can whatever we want ?" :blink:

 

"So it was illegal, and cheating our own government & people, but we wanted to help ourselves our supporters poor farmers !" :wink:

 

"It was only taxpayers' money !" :wacko:

 

"But we weren't supposed to get caught  ...  don't they know who we are were ?!" :unsure:

 

 

It is indeed good to see, in these cases, Thai corruption getting what it deserves  ...  I only wish this were more common, regardless of who is involved, and which group/party they come from..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One might ask where was the PM when this evidence was presented to parliament, and the answer would be anywhere but in parliament which she avoided as much as possible. Then she can claim her usual ignorance and apathy, "I don't know and I don't care."

But if she hopes to defeat a charge of negligence, she had better have proof that some steps were taken to investigate the claims, with backing evidence, presented to parliament. And sending Chalerm to have a look just won't make the grade.

 

The presence of Thaksin's mate Apichart in this scam as well is interesting. It seems B900 million agent's fees weren't enough, or perhaps they realised the whole pledging scam was going to fail and went for the big score before it did. Either way, it gets harder and harder to pretend the Shinawatras weren't back to their favourite game, corruption.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, RichardColeman said:

The mistake she made maybe was not having the army with her and ready to give her full immunity to any balls up  !

Actually that was what brought her down, she was trying to get an amnesty for her brother herself and many others thankfully the good people of Thailand rose up and deposed of her. The amnesty of her brother (but would have included her and her ministers too) was just too much for many honest people to accept. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its amazing... (not) how one of the people included in the fake G2G deals is again connected to Thaksin. Its like they designed the program to allow for corruption. This certainly does not bode well for YL her case. If these G2G deals can be shown to have been fake in court and connected to Thaksin's friends and MP's of her cabinet it certainly would damage YL her credibility. It would show that this whole scheme was setup to allow corruption or at least had far too less checks. That would mean the negligence case against YL only got stronger.

 

Now those on the red side don't have to worry YL is HISO she won't see jail, but a guilty verdict and a fine is an option.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with the facts layed out above it stops all the  "yl/ptp is innocent" people from spreading their innuendo, the facts speak for themselves and shows just how corrupt the whole process was but off course yl was totally unaware it was all happening ...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, robblok said:

Its amazing... (not) how one of the people included in the fake G2G deals is again connected to Thaksin. Its like they designed the program to allow for corruption. This certainly does not bode well for YL her case. If these G2G deals can be shown to have been fake in court and connected to Thaksin's friends and MP's of her cabinet it certainly would damage YL her credibility. It would show that this whole scheme was setup to allow corruption or at least had far too less checks. That would mean the negligence case against YL only got stronger.

 

Now those on the red side don't have to worry YL is HISO she won't see jail, but a guilty verdict and a fine is an option.  

Right the first time, from it's first incarnation it was a vehicle for corruption. Thaksin's mate Apichart getting preferential treatment, the bulk of the government's rice business and still manages a huge bankruptcy (President Agri - remember who wanted to be president?) and then, despite this and a huge debt to the government, gets preferential treatment in closed door deals for huge agency fees from Yingluk. Now he's a big player in the G2G rort.

I've seen coal miners finish a double shift not as dirty as this mongrel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, halloween said:

Right the first time, from it's first incarnation it was a vehicle for corruption. Thaksin's mate Apichart getting preferential treatment, the bulk of the government's rice business and still manages a huge bankruptcy (President Agri - remember who wanted to be president?) and then, despite this and a huge debt to the government, gets preferential treatment in closed door deals for huge agency fees from Yingluk. Now he's a big player in the G2G rort.

I've seen coal miners finish a double shift not as dirty as this mongrel.

Yeah...I've worked with some lazy sods in the mines too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...