Defiance after Abhisit reprieve

[seajae]

4 hours ago, pornprong said:

It appears you support a Thailand without democracy or freedom.

Isn't it funny how there was plenty of death and violence in Thailand in 1976 and 1992.... yet there were not yet any red shirts?

Perhaps a rethink of your beliefs is in order?

never has been democracy in Thailand, thaksin simply stole as much as he could and so has everyone else, what I dont support are the reds, yellows & corruption, all are bad news, the reds are terrorists on top of it and were formed by thaksin to get his money back.There will be no democracy in Thailand until all the corrupt politicians, graft, reds and yellows are removed. When a population has 70% odd that thinks graft is good as long as they get a bit of it what more can you expect than what we have now, good education is central to fixing it but that will never happen because then the people will know they are all being lead around by the nose. Abhisit was given no choice but to put the army in with the way the reds were carrying on and thaksin was the one pushing and paying them to cause all the trouble, those facts are there for all to see

[baboon]

1 hour ago, seajae said:

never has been democracy in Thailand, thaksin simply stole as much as he could and so has everyone else, what I dont support are the reds, yellows & corruption, all are bad news, the reds are terrorists on top of it and were formed by thaksin to get his money back.There will be no democracy in Thailand until all the corrupt politicians, graft, reds and yellows are removed. When a population has 70% odd that thinks graft is good as long as they get a bit of it what more can you expect than what we have now, good education is central to fixing it but that will never happen because then the people will know they are all being lead around by the nose. Abhisit was given no choice but to put the army in with the way the reds were carrying on and thaksin was the one pushing and paying them to cause all the trouble, those facts are there for all to see

You don't support yellows, reds and corruption, then proceed to demonise one side and excuse the other. You do not even throw the other side a sop to make it look like you making an attempt to sound objective.

You do support one side. Without qualification or reservation. End of.

[tomta]

21 hours ago, Somtamnication said:

Both sides equally as guilty. This problem has no solution. 

There is guilt on both sides. But both sides are not equally guilty. This problem  has solutions

[tomta]

12 hours ago, natway09 said:

Somebody had to stop the anarchy !! Come on guys they started burning & ransacking banks, shopping centres, substations etc. I personally had to drive over burning tyres in Rama 4 where the Bangkok Bank was warming up nicely with burning tyres being pulled up the steps.

In most countries if i had a gun I could have legally shot them as looting was going on

 

If the police had done their job from the start & not let tents be pitched in the middle of a 6 lane highway at Ratchaprasong  this could have been nipped in the bud before it escalated 

You seem to forget that the burning of buildings started after the 90 dead people died. Your statement makes me happy that you are not allowed to carry a gun here. What was so important to you that you would need to drive on burning tyres?

[joecoolfrog]

10 hours ago, seajae said:

never has been democracy in Thailand, thaksin simply stole as much as he could and so has everyone else, what I dont support are the reds, yellows & corruption, all are bad news, the reds are terrorists on top of it and were formed by thaksin to get his money back.There will be no democracy in Thailand until all the corrupt politicians, graft, reds and yellows are removed. When a population has 70% odd that thinks graft is good as long as they get a bit of it what more can you expect than what we have now, good education is central to fixing it but that will never happen because then the people will know they are all being lead around by the nose. Abhisit was given no choice but to put the army in with the way the reds were carrying on and thaksin was the one pushing and paying them to cause all the trouble, those facts are there for all to see

So to be straight , you are impartial , yet spend all your time attacking just one side !!!!

[ALLSEEINGEYE]

On 9/1/2017 at 6:02 PM, pornprong said:

Thaksin wasn't there, he never personally stacked anyone in a any truck.....the Thai military on the other hand.

War on drugs.....Thaksin was just acting on orders.

 

It's probably just a matter of time until you start blaming Thaksin for the 2010 massacre.

 

Off with the pixies?

I think so.

Thaksin was the PM so whose orders was he acting on??? The police were acting on his orders. And yes, I do blame him for 2010, he was the paymaster. it was ALL done in his name to bring him back.