bradiston

You read somewhere? I read somewhere that all Trump supporters are ESN with IQs of less than 50. Can't remember where I read it. Probably on non MSM, if that exists for the toxic majority of Trump supporters.

Why are you grinding this axe? What's the point? This parrot is dead. It is no more. It has passed on. Assange is free.

I think they went bust. Maybe bought by another airline. Flew with them a long time ago. Cheap and cheerful back then. Online reports don't make it very clear of their current status. Filed for bankruptcy in July 2020.

I said since October 7th, right?

Wrong link. https://aje.io/3o3vl9

I just mentioned them in response to the OP's post. Check that out. I'm not here to be of use to you.

Point taken. He's obviously not Hitler, at least not the last time I checked. But his rants about immigrants being a subspecies - Hitler's phrase was "untermensch" - and somehow genetically infected/inferior, are Hitlerian. If Trump was talking about Jews in this language, I would be very surprised if his phone didn't blow off his other ear. He'd be arrested for racially motivated hate speech. I posted a link to a source that ran a piece on his ravings. It was on Al Jazeera. https://aje.io/4rx0oj

Ask the OP.

I replied to the reply to that one. My comment was addressed to you. Comparing him literally as opposed to comparing him what? Roughly? Vaguely? Allegorically? Indirectly? Approximately?

Ok. List please the "many stupid, ill conceived, embarrassing (sic) choices" Labour has made, seeing as there are "so, so many". The ICJ rulings were damning in every respect, all 7 of them, against the UK. The International Tribunal of the Sea ditto. We have no claim there. You don't like China's behaviour yet you would follow the same route. You've no leg to stand on. It's just Rule Britannia. Falklands Mk II.

Comparing him literally? Explain!

HM government has lost every single case brought before the various international courts. They castigate other nations who don't abide by such rulings (China in the "South China" Sea, Putin, Duterte, and a host of others who refuse to recognise the jurisdiction of the ICC, the ICJ, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, and the UN General Assembly). The current administration's bold move to actually abide by them is the right thing to do. Their position was untenable. No doubt there'll be howls of displeasure from the US. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chagos_Archipelago

I read it as heavily ironic, not to be taken literally!

Why don't you read the Wikipedia article? Hypertext (as in HTML, right?) is extremely useful for following links, sources, updates, questionable entries etc etc. You don't get that from your Right Wing hand book for arguing on public forums, or Trolling for Beginners, or Ignorance, where do I sign up handbook, now do you? The Wikipedia article on the Nazi party strangely enough does go into that, but because you refuse to read any "leftist, woke, libtard" links, you'll never know. So what books do you recommend I read? Nazism 101? Stalinism for beginners? How I learned to love Lenin and never look back? The National Socialist party was set up to counter the Marxist Leninism version of socialism. Even though Russia and Germany were allies at the outset of WWII (the Ribbentrop/Molotov pact was a non aggression pact they invaded Poland), it didn't last long, when Hitler decided to invade Russia. Nazis and communists (Marxist Leninists) ripped each other to shreds later, quite literally. They remain to this day sworn enemies.

Like any self respecting government does.

You just don't get it, do you? The goalposts are part of the conspiracy!

It's infantile to suggest because the word "socialism" appears in the full title of the Nazi party they were somehow putting into practice a Marxist socialist agenda. Hitler created the Nazi party to fight the Marxist notion of socialism, not to put it into practice. He was a sworn enemy of Marxism. You and he have more in common than you think. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism

Slightly economical with the truth, that statement. It's not what the US government said.

Hardly rank as conspiracy theories though, do they? More simply differences of opinion. Usually a conspiracy theory has a motive for the conspiracy. Biden's stepped down, the laptop saga is way beyond my non US comprehension, and what vaccine doesn't possibly have side effects? I mean, there are side effects from breathing. The oxygen will eventually kill you! Yes, it's true! Check it out!

It's only viewed that way in the US by the hard right. Some would say greed is a disease. Certainly obesity which the US is stuffed to the eyeballs with, is. And drug use. Junk 'n drugs. Great nation you have there. And I'm not even an American, or Western, hater. I rank the 50s and 60s in the US as 2 of the greatest decades in recent history. Well, I was born in 1950, so I guess I would, wouldn't I? I value European culture. I think it's man at his utmost. I read missives from the western haters, who to a person, are westerners, everyday on these forums. But have they been to Florence? Venice? Chartres? How dare they describe the west as "decadent" as Medvedev did? It's their homeland! The Jews were being given a hard time in Europe since way back when - the 14th century? Nothing to do with Marxist Leninism. Many Jews became prominent socialists and communists. And if you think I'm a Stalinist, think again. I don't knowingly support any anti Jewish movement. I have the utmost respect for Jews, their humour, their intelligence, their strength. But of course there's a catch, which is that, when converted to nationalism, it becomes a whole different ball game, unfortunately. But the UK appeared to face annihilation also this century, but was spared, miraculously. I'll not forget the US's part in that. Ever!

Oh 55555. Good stuff? Drivel. Never heard of Bacon, Locke, Voltaire, Rousseau, Kant, Hegel, Marcuse, Marx (yes, Karl himself), Lukacs, Althusser, Heidegger, Kierkegaard, Sartre and a million other European philosophers and writers? So damn' ignorant. Of your own history, let alone European.

List these "way too many conspiracy theories" that have miraculously "come true". Of course it's a stupid remark, because conspiracy theorists will never admit they were wrong. Trump is a shining example. The COVID crowd another. A hoax? Do me a favour! Ask the families of those who lost loved ones. Sandy Hook? Fat slob Alex Jones came a cropper there for perpetuating his filthy lies. Deep state? Kidnapped kids? Qanon? Your source material IS MSM, so you must spend many hours poring over it looking for yet another theory, like in "A Beautiful Mind". Seen it? Linking up totally disparate and unrelated ads and headlines in newspapers and magazines? At least Nash was a genius and came up with his original idea despite his very troubled mind. I don't see any such brilliance in you guys. Just the old chip on the shoulder, bitter, resentful biting of the hand that you feed from. Nothing original. Nothing worth reading. All media ends up as MSM. It's a consumable. Copy is consumable, whatever it's origin. It's inescapable.

Firstly, how do you define "the Left". Does it really exist in America? To an outsider like me, it seems there is no such thing. You mean it as an insult, which it isn't outside of the US. You speak for all American Jews it seems. But only to further your invective against your construct of "the Left". Even if it did exist, how many Jews count themselves part of it? Jews have always been part of, leaders of, in some cases, a strong tradition of intellectually independent liberal thinking. It's Arabs and Muslims who have borne the brunt of hate crimes since October 7th, just as they did after 9/11. They might well benefit from 2A. But that's what it was designed to do, right? One size fits all.

It's exactly what I was saying. He had no idea what his sentence might have been if he'd handed himself in. So, he didn't.

I don't trust your sources. And you see, you exhibit the usual paranoid projection of "They (could be anyone on your hate list) want you to (fill in as imagined)". I guess you're an American. Maybe most Republicans aren't smart enough to work as journalists? I mean, they sure don't appear to be that smart.