impulse

You should note that I picked up on a long dormant thread... You may be yelling at a cloud. I've done that before.

Like I said, the wheels of justice grind slowly... It'll be interesting to see the results of the appeal. In another year or so?

The wheels of justice grind slowly, but grind they do... Now let's see if there's any consequences. Court Declares Justin Trudeau’s Sweeping Actions To Suppress Trucker Protests Were Illegal https://dailycaller.com/2024/01/23/court-declares-justin-trudeaus-sweeping-actions-suppress-trucker-protests-illegal/

You can disagree all you want with their analysis. I often do. But they got the facts right. If they didn't, please enlighten us.

You mean the co-conspirators who were offered leniency in return for a guilty plea and testifying against Trump? If I had to choose between risking 20 years in prison or pleading guilty and testifying in return for a suspended sentence, I can't say I'd be strong enough to stand for my convictions. Besides, we haven't heard their testimony yet, have we? If you look at all the irregularities outlined in the Texas claims of December, 2020 a reasonable person may conclude Trump was actually protecting the democratic process, not stealing it. But they carefully chose a venue where there probably weren't too many Trump fans on the Grand Jury.

That was about the 3rd or 4th iteration of the message.

You can blame them, or you can blame the gub'ment and Big Pharma for the Orwellian way they handled the pandemic, destroying the public's trust. Anyone remember "Get vaccinated and you won't get sick"? Or, "Get the shot and you can visit grandma"? They've changed the goalposts so often that a huge percentage of the people don't trust them. And probably won't for years.

You don't remember all the scandals when they found politicians had illegals working for them? Housemaids, nannies, etc? It was a big thing for awhile.

I don't know about jail, but there used to be a huge fine if the gub'ment found a company employing illegal workers.

The current "deal" being rejected by the Repubs calls for allowing the first 5,000 illegals a day to cross. No visa, no vetting, no way of knowing who they are. That's 1.8 million a year. To be processed, handed a free cell phone and sent on their merry way. Ostensibly, on to a free flight to the destination where they need more Dem votes in the future. Anyone beyond 5,000 a day would have to sneak across the same way they do today. So, basically no change except spending more money... Does that sound like something they should agree to?

You're confusing money for border security with money for expedited handling. A common misdirection from Dems and their media arm. The funding they're blocking is to put more resources at the border to allow more illegals to be processed and released faster. Not to keep them out.

It may have been as simple as a murder-suicide, but I sure hope they're investigating the possibility of a 3rd person killing both of them and making it look that way.

70% of black kids grow up in fatherless homes. And I blame rap music. Edit: And if you want a better (and more entertaining) answer than I could ever give you, look up a YouTube called HERE IS WHY BLK PEOPLE HATE OFFICER TATUM. I'd post a link, but I'm in China where YouTube is blocked.

I'm looking forward to the brave Patriot that FOIA's the flight records to see where they sent them all in the middle of the night. Then the documents and e-mails where they discussed and decided where to send them in the middle of the night. Because I guaranty they selected their destinations based on some kind of voting formula, where those votes would have the maximum effect when they implement the next part of their scheme, which is to grant them voting rights. Several cities have already tried. Just running it up the flagpole... Or it may be as simple as turning Texas blue, which is really all they need to do to pretty much guaranty a Dem win in every presidential election. But that's not nefarious enough. They need Congress and local elections, too. The greedy bastards they are.

But then watch them like a hawk, lest they spit in your drink or your dish.

If that's the case, I suspect they don't want it getting out that he was "catch and release(d)". Doesn't bode well for liberal policy makers. BTW, being an old Chicago boy myself, there's a reason they called Belushi's character in The Blues Brothers "Joliet Jake".

It is in respect to what the voters think about the partisan political prosecutions going on. Every time, his polling numbers go up. And I think the case itself is going to be a much bigger deal than the MSM media arm of the Dem Party is predicting. You guys really need to start reading the right wing stuff. If only to know what the enemy is thinking. Lack of curiosity is not a virtue.

Accepting gratuities from him is illegal. Plane tickets and cruises...

More than that... All the Trumpers who were coerced into pleading guilty and testifying in return for leniency, may not have to testify. Immediately after the judge rules the guy can't get a fair trial with her at the helm, their lawyers will be filing appeals. Then, the lawsuits will start.

I don't sit in those rooms. But when I see such a tightly choreographed administration release a statement claiming Iran is probably going to kill Americans (direct or by proxy), I don't think it's nothing. They made that release for a reason. They're priming us to accept war.

So that means she's guilty of conflict of interest and he's stealing his ex wife's money. What a team...

I think the Supreme Court just handed Trump the White House when they allowed the Biden Admin to cut Texas' razor wire on the border. Now, voters know that the only way to protect the border is a change in the WH. All that congress is negotiating is how much money they're gonna spend on processing all the illegals faster. https://dailycaller.com/2024/01/22/supreme-court-allows-biden-admin-to-remove-texas-border-wire/ Of course, the SC may also take the WH back, depending on how some of the partisan court cases go.

You may be right. But I got the sense that they were gauging the pro-Palestinian protests and polling numbers to make sure there wouldn't be too high a political price to pay for actually defending troops. To answer your question about minions, they're the people whose sole job is getting their guy into power and keeping him in power, no matter how much it hurts Americans. They'd gladly see a war with Iran (or anyone else) if it kept their guy in the White House. They seem to be beating the war drums. https://dailycaller.com/2024/01/22/biden-admin-american-troops-iran-houthis-middle-east/ Edit: Minions are also the ones claiming the border is secure...

There's a name I haven't heard in years. I always thought she was smart and competent. But my opinion of her always had a "guilt by association" bent to it, with her being associated with the warmongers that fooled us back into Iraq. Has she redeemed herself?

I miss the old days of TVF when I could hover over (or click?) the emojis to see who sent them. Nowadays, there's a few forums where I consider scrunchy faced emojis a badge of honor. As a personal policy, I only use the "like" emoji. Not worth the negative energy to choose between the scrunchy faces.