impulse

But I think there's a risk in getting on HRC's bad side. Maybe DOGE can look into that list, too. I did some back of an envelope statistics and found the odds to be real low that so many would die mysterious deaths. Like one start in the universe low.

Those kids from DOGE will find the trail of USAID cash to Snopes. Dollars to donut holes. Yesterday, I saw a diagram tracking the convoluted way money's being laundered. Looked like one of those maze puzzle books I used to fly with to occupy a few hours.

Did Trump sniff any hair on camera in front of the whole world?

And Biden wasn't wearing his hardhat backwards, according to Snopes. That's how trustworthy they are. Dollars to donut holes they're they were getting USAID money, too.

So you don't think the Pizzagate story was concocted to divert attention from the Diddy story, to make it seem so ridiculous that anyone pointing out Diddy's parties would be derided and made to look the fool?

Before DOGE is through, mediabiasfactcheck.com will be one of their reveals. Which is neither here, nor there. Are they wrong?

Seems like a reasonable swap. Leopard print-print shirt for a worn out scout uniform.

Are they wrong? BTW, I can point to a dozen crappier sources without even breaking a sweat.

But I'm sure that truemediabiasfactcheckerreallytrustus.com says they're neutral.

'Cause XY guys don't do this... Not until recently anyway.

I believe that the standard is that he can decide whether complying would cause irreversible damage. Pissing the money away would be a irreversible. Or, my favorite... Possession is 9/10 of the Law. The money's in his possession (figuratively). He can decide not to dole it out. In any case, he's got better lawyers than the lefties on AN.

I will be surprised if the ruling isn't overturned. It's easy to get a ruling when you shop the venues for an Obama/Biden appointed minor District Judge. Not so easy as it goes up the appeals chain.

Early days. More will be revealed as the kids from DOGE dig deeper.

All the ones paying $8 million for it? Boebert probably didn't even know she had a paid subscription; much less how much it was costing taxpayers. What I'm hearing is that they were pre-installed on gub'ment provided computers when they walked in the door.

That's all well and good. But I'll bet the guy in the OP is wishing he'd rented. And I've met a few guys in similar situation while working in LOS. And these guys weren't dumb, nor noobs. Mostly they got caught out by Land Office corruption and one of them got taken by his wife.

That may be the juiciest part of the whole story. I wonder if he recruited them from any campus protests?

Holey Moley. Rubio's looking to reduce UASID headcount from 14,000 to 294. USAID workers uncertain as lawsuit hits Trump administration over cuts : NPR NPR's not happy, but does that surprise anyone? Maybe they should have hired a few registered Repubs to plead their case.

I absolutely support her decision to be sterilized. But she's not doing team Dem any favors by declaring she did it because of the Bad Orange Man. That just makes her look crazy. And her team, by association.

Profit. Earnings. I'll let you be pedantic... That's what my bonuses were based on. EBITDA. That's what the market used to price our stock, too. If you're going to compare apples with apples, ya gotta choose one or the other. Comparing EBITDA before and after...

Oops. You caught me in an error, copying over a number. My source says it's $2.7 B. Which makes it even more impressive that he's eking out almost twice the profit from about half the revenue. That's efficiency.

That's a good cautionary... But even in the authorized shops in Thailand they charge a lot less than back home. Not a smartphone, but I took a computer in once back home and they charged me $120 just to open it, plus parts and labor. (Told me to come back in a week) I had a laptop motherboard repair done in Fortune Town and they charged me 1000 baht, all in. Had a fried chip that he replaced, (while I watched). I was impressed that he even identified the fault.

The elected President of the USA is challenging the decision by a (minor) District Court judge. That's how it works. They'll sue him and take it to a higher court. It's business as usual. Except it's the Bad Orange Man so lefty panties are all in a wad. And the partisan MSM is in a tizzy. It's funny how they're all using the same half true buzzwords, just like they did during the election.

And Musk isn't getting rid of anything. He's been authorized by the head of the Executive Branch to audit the books and identify dead wood that can be eliminated by the proper authorities within the framework of checks and balances. Of course there will be court challenges. That's all baked in, and the sooner they can work them up the appeals ladder, the better for the American citizenry.

Post back with the response from the supplier. Can you tell if they did a good job anodizing that aluminum? (other than the obvious...) How do their other panels look?

Lefty talking points. Pushed by CNN, MSDNC and (until recently defunded) Politico.