Jump to content

faraday

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    8,410
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by faraday

  1. Probably been blocked for reporting the truth.Who knows here any more.

    Something new blocked everyday

    You think the beeb reports the truth.....or you just want to highlight you apparent disdain for Thailand?

  2. I don;t drink.

    So far.... there seems to be a lot of jealousy on this thread. Why is that?

    I never said I achieved anything nor am I proud of whatever you think I am proud of. This is you putting words in my mouth.

    I am definitely boasting about living cheap here.

    Anyone else?

    I wouldn't call that the correct use of english.

    Why the need to boast; do you somehow feel that you're not good enough?

  3. What does concern me about legalising or the decriminalisation of Cannabis, is that at some point a stronger version will be produced.

    When ingesting a compound - whether it is a pom, or a so callled 'recreational' drug, it's about potency, dose & route of administration.

    It is not possible to OD on Cannabis if the person smokes it. But perhaps there could be an immensely concentrated product, that really could do harm.

    In Farangistan, there's a synthetic cannabis available called 'Spice' which often triggers a Psychotic Episode, or an overdose event.

    Cannabis Oil is very potent I believe; perhaps later, an injectable form will be available, a transdermal preparation, or a Tablet & thus causing MH issues....?

    ...and you have the same concerns about alcohol, which is a far more potentially damaging drug?

    Yes I do, & look how the Brewers have manipulated people into consuming more of that Physically Addictive drug.

    But this thread is a discussion about Cannabis, which is why I didn't include my concerns about Alcohol in my post.

    But not stronger - I think that looking at marijuana in isolation means you don't actually understand recreational drug-taking and the aims of legalising or at least decriminalising this and / or other drugs and the inherent problems and the effects - your concern about "stronger" versions is at best a red-herring.

    I think foar to many people have the wrong end of the stick and consider that the drugs themselves directly bring about the social problems associated with them.....this of course is not the case - strong or weak, a lot of the problems associated with drugs are down to the ways that society - usually ineptly - tries to handle them.

    One of the main reasons that it is still illegal is the strength of the alcohol lobby in places like UK and USA. To see any of this is isolation is to ignore the elephant in the room

    Nope, my concerns about stronger versions being available are not a 'Red Herring'. As different & more potent strains have been - & continue to be produced.

    People like taking drugs & some people want more of a buzz, so look for a substance or a preparation that will get them higher.

    I can remember over 20 years ago, some drinks manufacturer commenting on 'Alco-pops' said that they will help make the transition from 'orange juice much easier'.

    And it certainly did. When in my 20's I only drank beer, & hardly ever drank spirits. Now, it seems that young people drink all the various spirit concotions regularly.

    They want more of a buzz. Whether that's due to the Brewers influencing them I don't know. But I suspect it is, as all to often Alcohol is portrayed as being 'good fun'.

    And 'more is fun' - right? Of course we know that's not true.

    Ingesting Cannabis alone doesn't seem to make people aggresive or commit indecent assaults.

    But as we all know, when these events do occur, it is very often because of Alcohol.

  4. What does concern me about legalising or the decriminalisation of Cannabis, is that at some point a stronger version will be produced.

    When ingesting a compound - whether it is a pom, or a so callled 'recreational' drug, it's about potency, dose & route of administration.

    It is not possible to OD on Cannabis if the person smokes it. But perhaps there could be an immensely concentrated product, that really could do harm.

    In Farangistan, there's a synthetic cannabis available called 'Spice' which often triggers a Psychotic Episode, or an overdose event.

    Cannabis Oil is very potent I believe; perhaps later, an injectable form will be available, a transdermal preparation, or a Tablet & thus causing MH issues....?

    ...and you have the same concerns about alcohol, which is a far more potentially damaging drug?

    Yes I do, & look how the Brewers have manipulated people into consuming more of that Physically Addictive drug.

    But this thread is a discussion about Cannabis, which is why I didn't include my concerns about Alcohol in my post.

  5. What does concern me about legalising or the decriminalisation of Cannabis, is that at some point a stronger version will be produced.

    When ingesting a compound - whether it is a pom, or a so callled 'recreational' drug, it's about potency, dose & route of administration.

    It is not possible to OD on Cannabis if the person smokes it. But perhaps there could be an immensely concentrated product, that really could do harm.

    In Farangistan, there's a synthetic cannabis available called 'Spice' which often triggers a Psychotic Episode, or an overdose event.

    Cannabis Oil is very potent I believe; perhaps later, an injectable form will be available, a transdermal preparation, or a Tablet & thus causing MH issues....?

  6. Traffic is allready vely dangerous with loads of accidents. That will only get worse.

    There are many drunk drivers, then we also get stoned drivers.

    Also it isn't any good for the working mentality.

    I don't see any advantage for when it was legal in Thailand.

    give me at least one documented example of stoned driver causing an accident

    Just because this information is most likely not available,it does not mean this doesn't happen.

    Drug testing after an accident is relatively new.

  7. My wife says "sugar" is not an an essential part of Thai cooking.

    She never uses stuff

    In that case her cooking is going to be unbalanced. Crucial to every dish (and to every meal overall) is the balance of sour, sweet, salty, bitter, and spicy. Take away one element in a dish and the food is not going to be "right".

    Which can be achieved without the addition of sugar.

    Your post implies that sugar must be added to everydish. This is incorrect.

  8. As long as the Pork is cooked well enough you will be OK smile.png

    more worrying is what you don't see

    regards Worgeordie

    correct: cooked poo is harmless tongue.png

    Gentlemen, I worry about you both; have you actually tried this?

    555!

    There is even a third poster who theorize about foreign poo bacteria may cure his overweight.crazy.gif

    There are some people who actually have Fecal Transplants...

    They take the merde & whack it up the rear shoot.

    Don't think I'll be doing that somehow....

  9. iagree.gif Anyone that believes in this muck needs help, Next you'll start believing that spirits actually reside in your wife's ghost house and really consumes the offerings put out for them. duh.gif

    "Muck" Somewhat an overly strong word to use,don't you think.

    Do you know anything about Symbolism; we are surrounded by it all the time.

    It has a significant effect on all our lives....

    Think about it a bit more, before making such seditious remarks - ok blud?

×
×
  • Create New...