johng

In this case the supreme court agreed with the 5th circuit that 1st amendment violations where likely committed as seen in my quotes above...they however dismissed the case because the plaintiffs could not show "standing" which I believe means they could not show smoking gun evidence that they themself where personally targeted ( in other words the court dropped the hot potato using a "technicality" to kick a judgment down the road) ....however the recent letter from a certain Mr Zuckerberg might change that "standing" ??? and I believe other cases are in motion.

Ip address can be spoofed using a proxy or changed using a VPN you can also spoof MAC addresses and web browser signatures to make it look like a different computer system clearing cookies after every session will also help a lot to prevent "profiling" I'm sure admin on this site are able to see everyone's IP and a whole lot more like mentioned above plus possible even things like the computer system time,screen resolution maybe cpu specification and ram size too...to build up a pretty good best guess.

The case of State of Missouri v. Biden https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca5/23-30445/23-30445-2023-10-03.html Ultimately, we find the district court did not err in determining that several officials—namely the White House, the Surgeon General, the CDC,the FBI, and CISA—likely coerced or significantly encouraged social-media platforms to moderate content, rendering those decisions state actions.20 In doing so, the officials likely violated the First Amendment and we do not take our decision today lightly. But, the Supreme Court has rarely been faced with a coordinated campaign of this magnitude orchestrated by federal officials that jeopardized a fundamental aspect of American life. Therefore, the district court was correct in its assessment—“unrelenting pressure” from certain government officials likely “had the intended result of suppressing millions of protected free speech postings by American citizens.” We see no error or abuse of discretion in that finding... And then gave them the green light to carry on regardless !!!

They have tried and continue to try but keep on running into that slight 1st amendment problem...darn that pesky constitution !

Hope the other woman's arm wasn't snapped in 2 I suspect it was.

Well thanks , I like it too. Just had to have one since the first time I set eyes on one... this one in fact 125 scrambler modded version.

There's a weird obsession with a certain subset of officialdom for wearing masks I still see them everyday on the television in the early evenings.

Yes but on my bike I had to go the other way and have the shop create a dip and slight bump on the seat to stop me sliding off every time I braked a bit too hard !

Yes find a shop to shave the foam down or go online for the "racing seat" flat like a surfboard hard as hell on the bum might as well use a plank of wood 😋

Rubbish ! he said to go and protest peacefully and patriotically Twitter then deleted his account.

Thanks to "Manu from" another place. "The decision to retract was made due to two major issues. 1. Reliability of the data and choice of the data. The Belgian dataset in particular was found to be unreliable, based on estimates. 2. The assumption that all patients that entered the clinic were being treated the same pharmacologically was incorrect. The above two issues meant that the Editor-in-Chief found the conclusions of the article to be unreliable and therefore the article needed to be retracted." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S075333222301853X

Still waiting for that illusive list of "approved credible sources"

I watched "Interstellar" 2014 last night, seems the Thais might be onto something with the ghost thing 😋

I'm still using it.

The one I posted has been working for at least 6 years here is another one just about 20 meters further along the road however this guy has cut his tree down. 😋

look on Kaidee.com trawl around the local motorcycle dealers for some second hand deals or try Facebook market...I dont.

I think he will if its a hefty sentence but lets wait and see maybe he just gets a slap on the wrist.

Takes a few days, weeks,months,years for the real story to surface remember the missile into Poland that should have invoked article 5 ? ooops.

They will probably be confirmed to be Ukrainian drones.

Completely untrue rubbish....he called for peaceful respectful protest...on Twitter who prompty removed his post...look it up the info is out there now years later.

He did nothing of the sort complete disinformation you are spewing.

China tries to influence with money/investment "Uncle Sam" tries with sanctions, bullets and bombs.

shade tree example.

Pattaya is closer,cheaper and has more entertainment venues than Phuket.

No not a brand or chain...you find a nice big shady tree and setup shop underneath.