Jump to content

johng

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    17,456
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by johng

  1. As you can (not) see I've given you a confused emoji I quoted a snippet for brevity and didn't add a period. The Russian economy is doing better than expected despite the illegal USA sanctions where is the BS in that statement. Even the person I was replying to says.
  2. They say Thailand has 3 seasons Hot with no rain, hotter with rain and bloody hot !
  3. How do they calculated this ? have they invented a time machine creating a parallel timeline in which no one was vaccinated against the virus and compared it to our own timeline ?
  4. The "fact checkers" have arrived. Experts in their fields are asking questions. "fact checkers" Just get it through your thick "antivaxer" "right wing" "conspiracy theorist" skulls it can not be the vaccines ok the "experts" have spoken now shut up !
  5. There is no proof that they would have survived, it's impossible to say they would or would not have had a better outcome from the shot. + they can't be interviewed + https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9613797/ The IFRs had a median of 0.034% (interquartile range (IQR) 0.013–0.056%) for the 0–59 years old population, and 0.095% (IQR 0.036–0.119%) for the 0–69 years old. The median IFR was 0.0003% at 0–19 years, 0.002% at 20–29 years, 0.011% at 30–39 years, 0.035% at 40–49 years, 0.123% at 50–59 years, and 0.506% at 60–69 years. IFR increases approximately 4 times every 10 years. Including data from another 9 countries with imputed age distribution of COVID-19 deaths yielded median IFR of 0.025–0.032% for 0–59 years and 0.063–0.082% for 0–69 years. Meta-regression analyses also suggested global IFR of 0.03% and 0.07%, respectively in these age groups. The current analysis suggests a much lower pre-vaccination IFR in non-elderly populations than previously suggested.
  6. Glad you asked https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9613797/ The IFRs had a median of 0.034% (interquartile range (IQR) 0.013–0.056%) for the 0–59 years old population, and 0.095% (IQR 0.036–0.119%) for the 0–69 years old. The median IFR was 0.0003% at 0–19 years, 0.002% at 20–29 years, 0.011% at 30–39 years, 0.035% at 40–49 years, 0.123% at 50–59 years, and 0.506% at 60–69 years. IFR increases approximately 4 times every 10 years. Including data from another 9 countries with imputed age distribution of COVID-19 deaths yielded median IFR of 0.025–0.032% for 0–59 years and 0.063–0.082% for 0–69 years. Meta-regression analyses also suggested global IFR of 0.03% and 0.07%, respectively in these age groups. The current analysis suggests a much lower pre-vaccination IFR in non-elderly populations than previously suggested.
  7. Is there some boiler room that pays you guys to oppose trump and promote the MSM narrative on every subject ?
  8. But strangely its doing better than predicted even after the illegal sanctions imposed by the good ole USA
  9. nothing like a bit of Ablow to inspire a drug addict.
  10. The Tucker Carlson "interview" was from a very short table.
  11. There are other doctors and experts raising alarm bells...experts can be wrong, everyone should continuously question "the experts" scientific opinion, without critical questioning it's just religion.
  12. I think I do think don't you think ?
  13. Do your own research ? isnt that just for tin foilists ? I think you'll find John Campbell can't edit "his" own Wikipedia page ! to defend against alegations against him.
  14. Again with the "estimates" there is no way to prove that those "unvaccinated" would have lived if they had been. There are plenty vaccinated who still die from or with "the virus". not even getting into how vaccinated vs unvaccinated are counted/recorded.
  15. Perhaps they shouldn't be giving actual Nazis standing ovations in parliament.
  16. Oopps !!!!! Safe and Effective There is also an article in the paper that cannot be named on here entitled Long Covid, vaccines may cause disease and death: Chula, Rangsit also a new study COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals. found here https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.100 which concludes While our study confirmed previously iden­tified rare safety signals following COVID-19 vaccination and contributed evidence on several other important outcomes, further investigation is warranted to confirm associations and assess clinical significance.
  17. https://edition.cnn.com/2014/09/23/politics/countries-obama-bombed/index.html
  18. Wasn't there some military games or something with US participants in China in 2019 just before "the outbreak" also Italian sewage samples indicating prevalence of the virus in 2019....my Covid adled brain might be mistaken.
  19. Google admits and celebrates that it manipulates the search results. Their "do no evil" placard was removed from headquarters years ago.
  20. Bat xxxx crazy like a lab leak theory ?
  21. Completely made up in your own imagination ?
  22. I like to back the underdog sometimes they win.
  23. it's you that don't have a grasp of "the facts" due to listening to MSM and dismissing any disenting voice.
  24. Trump is as bad as that Hitler Putin devil incarnate
×
×
  • Create New...