Jump to content

candide

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    18,449
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by candide

  1. So he's not the left and, as usual, you provide no proof he claimed big pharma are pure as the driven snow. πŸ˜€
  2. A fact addition to the discussion. The global insulin market is dominated by three firms: Novo Nordisk, Elie Lily and Sanofi, and it's also the case in the U.S. The same brands are sold at different prices in the U.S. and elsewhere. On top of it, the leader Novo Nordisk is Danish, and the third one, Sanofi, is French. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK278938/table/insulin-pharmacology.T.insulins_commerci/ https://academic.oup.com/jlb/article/7/1/lsaa061/5918811
  3. David Andeman. Do you have proof or is it just one more baseless assertion? Is he representing "the left", now? πŸ˜€
  4. One more baseless assertion. Who in the left, is claiming big pharma are pure as the driven snow? You are making it up! πŸ˜€ NB It's not the left which blocked a cap of $35 on insulin (it's $12 in Canada), it's the GOP.
  5. Good to see MAGA fans are actually supporting big pharma! πŸ˜€
  6. No. He says he currently uses it from time to time. And it's prescription ketamine. What he used before was LSD microdoses every day (among others)
  7. Each and every health organisation has warned about the danger of bad food and promoted eating healthy food. There's nothing revolutionary about it. Only moron politicians would de facto promote eating big Macs! πŸ˜ƒ To be honest, there may be a benefit from the fact that it comes from a MAGA government. Obesity and eating junk food are frequent in the MAGA population, so it may have an impact on them. The message may not be rejected as the woke deepstate trying to prevent them from eating their greasy Patriotic hamburgers and pizzas πŸ˜ƒ
  8. Here's the full article you haven't read. πŸ˜ƒ https://www.opastpublishers.com/peer-review/excess-cardiopulmonary-arrest-and-mortality-after-covid19-vaccination-in-king-county-washington-8192.html The conclusion of the article: Conclusions: We identified a significant ecological and temporal association between excess fatal cardiopulmonary arrests and the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. The increase in excess cardiopulmonary arrest deaths may also be attributed to COVID-19 infection and disruptions in emergency care during the pandemic. Urgent further research is needed to confirm our observations with attention to risk mitigation for incident events and improved survival with resuscitation. That's exactly the problem with this explorative study. It's based on macro-level correlation of already aggregated data (not data about individuals), and only considers the vaccination rate. It doesn't consider the effect of other factors known to increase deaths. In particular, it doesn't test weather the Covid pandemic was not better correlated to deaths. There is also no comparison between death rates of non vaccinated vs vaccinated (because It's not a research on individuals, as noted before).
  9. Breitbar, eh eh! I see you are doing your 'own research'! πŸ˜„
  10. You still haven't provided proof of insider trading. πŸ˜€ 700% increase is quite good (it's only 550% for the Nasdaq index), but it's no evidence of insider trading. If the regulation changes, she cannot be indicted retroactively. πŸ˜€
  11. Not true, she declares them quickly. Example here: https://seekingalpha.com/news/4122059-nancy-pelosi-discloses-buys-of-nvidia-broadcom And you still (as others) have not provided any proof of insider trading.
  12. You have no proof of insider trading It's the usual RW propaganda which you are reproducing, as usual. πŸ˜€
  13. He can try ivermectin. It's at least effective against worms.
  14. Back to conspiracy theories again! Peer-reviewed and well ranked scientific publications are controlled by whoever can be conveniently blamed for it, but crappy YT videos banned in this forum tell the truth! πŸ˜€
  15. There are other long threads about why the Dems lost. This thread is about whether Trump was just talking B.S. at this occasion or he had something specific in mind. I think he was just talking B.S., as usual. Feel free to give your own opinion about this event.
  16. Right. She discloses every trade by her or her husband. It's transparent. Anyone is free to buy the same shares. Anyone is also free to complain to the SEC. You are welcome to try to use this information for posting your usual baseless claims! πŸ˜€
  17. The act was just a reconciliation of two bills previously voted in February and March by the house and the senate.. Nothing unexpected in it. When did her husband resell them? How much profit did he get from it?
  18. More attempted intrusion by the MAGA alternate universe Into reality..... πŸ˜ƒ
  19. There's a timeline here. I don't know if It's fully accurate, but it seems to be well documented. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/November_2024_Amsterdam_attacks
  20. What about the 'left-wing' Fortune? πŸ˜ƒ https://fortune.com/well/2024/03/18/elon-musk-ketamine-negative-frame-of-mind/
  21. Even when they win, MAGAs cannot help evoking lame conspiracy theories! πŸ˜€
  22. Clutching at straws after being proven wrong about the faithless electors. πŸ˜€ Hillary never claimed the count was rgged, she never plotted fake electors' list, and she never organised a "stop the steal" protest and sent a mob to the Capitol. Oh, and she never called a SoS to find her 11,700 votes. If you want to claim that the votes of the faithless electors were not what is written in the wikipedia article, feel free to correct those facts with another source! πŸ˜€ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_electors_in_the_2016_United_States_presidential_election
  23. So you acknowledged you posted fake news. Fine. But you go on with a ridiculous false equivalence. Hillary never claimed election had been rigged because of massive voter fraud. She didn't plot fake electors lists and did not benefit from the faithless electors' attempt. The aim of the faithless electors was not to elect her. None of them voted for Clinton. Out of 10 faithless electors, 8 were Dems who wanted to flip to Kasich, Powel or Sanders. Only 2 were Republicans and voted Kasich or Paul. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_electors_in_the_2016_United_States_presidential_election Hillary was a whiner, I agree with it.
  24. Fake MAGA news again, and you know it. Stop trolling! It's not Hillary who tried to flip electors. Actually, she got less delegates because of this attempt. πŸ˜ƒ
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...