candide

I don't understand the outrage! It just confirms he has the right qualities and credentials to work for the Trump administration! 😀

One more time! Is it not Putin who is seizing Ukraine's land by force? 😀

Do you have two forum IDs? 😀 That was a reply to Yelowtail's post, Anyway, whoever made this baseless claim, no evidence was provided, as usual.

So are you claiming that it is more of a problem than Putin seizing Ukraine's land?

I could say his bitch but that would not be polite! 😀

What a shame this Blackrock! Oh wait, it's not Putin taking Ukraine's land? 😀

Exactly. As soon as Trump was elected, Putin halted his war destruction! Oh wait! 😀

Complete B.S. from the MAGA alternate universe again! 😀

I am stating the obvious. If Putin attacks NATO, it will relegate Trump's (Putin's) peace plan to the dust bin.

Or he won't do it for obvious reasons! 😀

Again, Putin will do nothing because it is not in his interest to spoil his chances at a future Trump 'peace plan' which will likely grant him what he wants. And Biden knows it.

More intrusion attempt from the MAGA alternate universe. 😀

Putin will do nothing. He's waiting for Trump's peace plan as it will be like Christmas for him! 😀

In the MAGA alternate universe...😃

Good move by Biden, but too late.

Musk is an impressive entrepreneur. However, the personality characteristics that makes a good entrepreneur and innovator, are not the same as the necessary skills to manage a mature and established business such as Twitter. This failure was expected from the start.

It may explain his sometimes erratic behaviour and the fact he looks 'high'. Of course it's just my assumption.

So he's not the left and, as usual, you provide no proof he claimed big pharma are pure as the driven snow. 😀

A fact addition to the discussion. The global insulin market is dominated by three firms: Novo Nordisk, Elie Lily and Sanofi, and it's also the case in the U.S. The same brands are sold at different prices in the U.S. and elsewhere. On top of it, the leader Novo Nordisk is Danish, and the third one, Sanofi, is French. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK278938/table/insulin-pharmacology.T.insulins_commerci/ https://academic.oup.com/jlb/article/7/1/lsaa061/5918811

David Andeman. Do you have proof or is it just one more baseless assertion? Is he representing "the left", now? 😀

One more baseless assertion. Who in the left, is claiming big pharma are pure as the driven snow? You are making it up! 😀 NB It's not the left which blocked a cap of $35 on insulin (it's $12 in Canada), it's the GOP.

Good to see MAGA fans are actually supporting big pharma! 😀

No. He says he currently uses it from time to time. And it's prescription ketamine. What he used before was LSD microdoses every day (among others)

Each and every health organisation has warned about the danger of bad food and promoted eating healthy food. There's nothing revolutionary about it. Only moron politicians would de facto promote eating big Macs! 😃 To be honest, there may be a benefit from the fact that it comes from a MAGA government. Obesity and eating junk food are frequent in the MAGA population, so it may have an impact on them. The message may not be rejected as the woke deepstate trying to prevent them from eating their greasy Patriotic hamburgers and pizzas 😃

Here's the full article you haven't read. 😃 https://www.opastpublishers.com/peer-review/excess-cardiopulmonary-arrest-and-mortality-after-covid19-vaccination-in-king-county-washington-8192.html The conclusion of the article: Conclusions: We identified a significant ecological and temporal association between excess fatal cardiopulmonary arrests and the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. The increase in excess cardiopulmonary arrest deaths may also be attributed to COVID-19 infection and disruptions in emergency care during the pandemic. Urgent further research is needed to confirm our observations with attention to risk mitigation for incident events and improved survival with resuscitation. That's exactly the problem with this explorative study. It's based on macro-level correlation of already aggregated data (not data about individuals), and only considers the vaccination rate. It doesn't consider the effect of other factors known to increase deaths. In particular, it doesn't test weather the Covid pandemic was not better correlated to deaths. There is also no comparison between death rates of non vaccinated vs vaccinated (because It's not a research on individuals, as noted before).