candide

To be honest, I must admit that MAGAs have found a great argument which surpasses all the previous ones! 😃

Lol! The same polling organizations have been showing a Trump lead against Biden for months. So they were twisted in favor of Trump then? 😃

I think the real reason is much simpler than that. They do it because they are lacking arguments against her. 😃

Another way to say that you have nothing! Lawsuits, recounts, audits... you have nothing nada, waloo! 😀

Right. The MSM confirmed the authenticity of the laptop content, after they could get hold of a copy. It's a pity that Giuliani, despite his bad reputation, waited one year before releasing it, and gave it only to the biased NYPost. 😀

You forgot the Kraken! 😀

Yet, if Kamala wins, Trump (and probably you) will claim that the election has been rigged by massive voter fraud. 😀

RCP always shows higher scores for Trump than the other aggregators, so it could be considered as a pessimistic scenario for the Dems. Other aggregates are showing a larger Kamala win. This one would be the optimistic scenario. https://www.racetothewh.com/president/polls#google_vignette

Congratulations, Bignok! A poll with this type of result must have been hard to find! 😀

Hopeless comments from Trumpers! 😀

Keeping track of what Trump said,, that's not fair!. 😀

Meanwhile.... even the right-leaning aggregator RCP is now showing a Kamala win. https://www.realclearpolling.com/maps/president/2024/no-toss-up/electoral-college

Complete conspiracy B.S. as usual. The same polls have been showing a Trump win against Biden for months, and MAGA posters such as Ilisdean have been proudly posting each and every poll result on this forum! 😀

Ridiculous debunked conspiracy theory. 😀

The usual MAGA false equivalence tactics. There may have been a few complaints in 2016 but, unlike the Republicans about the 2020 election, there was no organised and wide campaign to claim that the vote counting was not right because elections had been rigged by massive voter fraud. BTW, It's Trump who claimed in 2016 and 2017 that the count was not right because of massive voter fraud! 😀

You shouldn't have too high expectations. It's Bignok! 😀

Trump is a coward and will not do it explicitly. He will not make precise claims, rather his usual tricks: "people say", "I've been told that" etc... And even more than before, he will let other people plot for him. There is a large number of people who are dumb enough to do it for him.

1. Deflection to another issue. BTW, the FBI did not cover up. The Steele Dossier was a private initiative and the FBI did not use it to predicate the Russia investigation. They had the Hunter laptop, under a subponea by a Grand Jury and they were not supposed to disclose information about an ongoing Grabd Jury investigation. (Why did Giuliani wait one year before giving a copy only to the NYPost.? It seems he did his best to make believe it was a CT 2. Ok you did not mention those CT. You cited the 33 Clintons' dead friends CT which is not much better. 2. It's illogical. I and another poster have explained why. It seems you cannot understand logic. 3. Another conspiracy trick. Who is "they" (the ones who already covered up in the 23 CT and may still be covering up, according to you.) Side comment about Maxwell: the main buyer was Epstein and he was jailed. That's why Maxwell got convicted, for supplying girls to Epstein. So your claim is not accurate. Sorry for being logical. (Others have been cited by a witness, ex.Andrew, I have not followed up much on it, so I cannot comment about them.)

Your usual dose of B.S.! 😃

The irony being that election officials in New Hampshire, in order to avoid conspiracy theories, decided not to select the widely used Dominion system. 😁 Instead they chose a new and inexperienced supplier..

You are extrapolating (making up) what I may have posted or thought. My points were very clear: - It's difficult not to mock the particular segment of GOP voters who believe ridiculous and debunked conspiracy theories such as Pizzagate or the Big Lie. (There is another segment composed of people who pretend to believe in some of them, but that's another story). I did not say everything Republicans are claiming is not true, and everything the democrats are claiming is true. - the argumentation you used was illogical. The existence of unrelated events doesn't give credibility to claims about the reality of other unrelated events. As to what I may believe or not, It's driven by facts (ex there is no basement in the pizzeria cited by the theory).

I forgot about it. For BM who don't know about it https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/Turbulent-Thailand/Thailand-king-s-elite-Red-Rim-officers-enter-the-spotlight

It's funny that some people are considering social security as "Socialist". It has been first introduced by Bismark, hardly a Socialist! 😀

Completely illogical. The existence of unrelated events cannot give any credibility to claims about the existence of other unrelated events. In particular when the claimed events are ridiculous and debunked.

Still illogical. The fact that some conspiracy theories have been proven true is no clue that the mentioned ridiculous and debunked onspiracy theories are true.