Jump to content

candide

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    16,926
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by candide

  1. Deflection is what MAGAs and assimilated say when confronted with facts,!
  2. Unlike you, I provide facts and sources. You only provide deflections, without any fact or source.
  3. Yes, it was me who brought up the fact that the IG was investigating Starlink. Where did I wrote (or the IG) that it was not fair to provide Internet access to poor countries? That was a deflection.
  4. And below is Trump's opinion. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/donald-trump-says-reason-he-won-last-months-presidential-election
  5. Why hurt? The IG was not investigating wether it was fair or not to provide Internet to poor countries. That was a lame deflection.
  6. And that's why it was one of Trump/Vance main campaign topic?
  7. You were not but that's what the poster I replied to was baselessly insinuating.
  8. For the time being, it's just get tweets out! 🙂
  9. Absolutely not. I have replied to your question, and I have explained why it was not enough, by citing facts. Then it's you discarding facts and replying with the usual political discourse. Tell me what the current administration plans to do to recover more money and fines, and I will gladly give my opinion about it.
  10. Of course. However, before accusing someone of fraud, evidence must be shown. On top of it, as the tax returns have been publicized, you can be sure they have been scrutinised by GOP analysts (and that the Dems did the same for GOP congressmen).
  11. The reason why he was fired? Maybe because this IG was investigating how Starlink used its USAID funding! 🤣 During a hearing at the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Oversight and Accountability in September, USAID Inspector General Paul K. Martin told Congress that the agency was examining its relationship with Starlink, one of Musk's most prominent tech ventures. https://www.newsweek.com/usaid-elon-musk-starlink-probe-ukraine-2027054
  12. More deflection... I was mentioned a fact, which explains (possibly among other causes) why so little money has been recovered. I wrote it's not enough. In other words, more should be done. Is it clear enough for you? I will express my opinion more clearly. This is just a political show trying to present something, already investigated and identified, as a new discovery of a hidden scandal by DOGE. This is known already, there was a congress investigation and a bill discussed. The bill was rejected by the GOP. There may or may not have been enough good reasons to reject this bill, but it explains why not enough has been done. So more should be done. What does the current administration intend to do about it, in order to recover more money and fines?
  13. That's what the source I linked said. Different sources seem to show different numbers. As to the people you cited, their tax returns are public. There is no mystery about where the money comes from. It's just one of your MAGA fake scandals.
  14. They failed to cooperate during a few hours on a security clearance matter....
  15. I have already replied that it's not enough.... and that a proposal to do more has been rejected by the GOP.
  16. Phagocytosis comes to mind...
  17. In other words, you have no meaningful reply....
  18. He said that later when he started to backpedal. Before the election, that's what he said. Sorry not nrc, press conference. https://edition.cnn.com/2024/12/12/economy/grocery-prices-inflation-trump-interview/index.html
  19. A the NRC and during the debate with Harris.
  20. Anybody with half a brain knew that Trump was lying when he said he would bring down the price of food immediately. MAGAs simply don't care about Trump's lies.
  21. And Russia is 1.7%. And its main neighbour is China with 17% of the world's population! 😆
×
×
  • Create New...