candide

Ok. Did they have the security clearance for accessing this data?

You are making up stuff again!

Blah blah. She did not personally receive any salary from her foundation, and her foundation never received 84 million. MAGA lies!

More intrusions from the MAGA alternate universe....

Caclubindia. More crappy sources!

More baseless claims...

"Why did they not open the books and cooperate." When did they do that? Source? As I wrote, I have nothing against it.

Your crappy site was lying! https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/chelsea-clinton-84-million-usaid/

Stop trolling. I have replied to your question about making USAID information available. Quote: "I have nothing against publishing details" About the other question, someone else replied already. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/chelsea-clinton-84-million-usaid/

Claims must be backed by reliable sources. I'm not going to waste my time with a crappy source. But feel free to back those claims with reliable sources!

I guess it depends on the impact on their pension.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/world-net-daily-wnd/

Are you so blinded by your love for Trump that you can't see I have already replied? "Personally, I have nothing against publishing details"

They used to publish annual reports every year. They included measuring performance on relevant indicators, and financial information. All audited by the OIG. Musk has not blocked access to the archives yet, so the reports up to 2016 can still be downloaded. https://2012-2017.usaid.gov/results-and-data/progress-data/agency-financial-report Personally, I have nothing against publishing details, but not the current propaganda circus by SM posts.

Translation, I'm not going to waste my time with you.

You defy me! BTW, I was not replying to you.

It used to be accessible (probably not at a granular level), in USAID annual reports. However since Musk took over, this information is censored. A good way to make sure that Musk's tweets cannot be cross-checked! When one clicks on any annual report link showed by Google, that's what always comes up!

You are posting propaganda misinformation again. The East-West Management Institute cited in the article is not an Open Society organization and has been funded by plenty of other organisations. (And BTW, it's activity was quite legit). https://ewmi.org/donors-and-partners

Thank you for linking this this interesting article. How does it contradict the fact that Twitter/X has to pay an annual interest of around $1.2 billion?

In the MAGA alternate reality, certainly! 🙂

It will certainly not be his own money! He will ask his MAGA fans to contribute and they will happily oblige! 🙂

But you're a troll! 🙂

Wnd! Can't you find a more crappy source! 😆

You should ask him about the facts supporting his claims! 🙂

What has the Biden administration to do with it! It's ridiculous! 😆