richard_smith237

So you were lying... what you really meant was "Us Brits will help others in Times of need only to prove a point if someone else does".... Typical of your character - no interest in helping, just trying to score a point...

Funny hard man talk again drunk driver..... You must be up to more illegal stuff than drink driving if you are too fearful of making friends with locals some of whom happen to work for the Thai Police force...

Perhaps you are different in person - but on this forum you are one of the nastiest negative anti-brits I who posts.... I can't imagine you lifting a finger for any Brit, any foreigner for that matter.... Though you have just stood up against vapid bigotry targeted against Russians, which is rather surprising - a glimmer of a redeeming feature - the slightest hope for you yet Malky.....

As are 78% of the members on this forum. Nope... you were never clever enough to interpret your own poll... .. It only counted those who could be bothered to respond - not all forum members... Most contributors would have just ignored the idiotic poll in the first place... .... Additionally, the questions in your poll were also fundamentally flawed leading to flawed results ("have you ever had a drink and driven?" is quite a different question from "do you drink drive?"...) But.... go ahead and justify that its ok being an ayhole drink driver because you think lots of others are.

How about an 88.1 KwH battery that will charged from 10-90% in 25 mins with 250 KW charger (mathematically)- I didn't calculate for more than 250 kW chargers because I've not see any (as you mentioned). BUT... realistically 'real world'... 30-80% while having a KFC at a service station (about 20 mins or so) - DC 150 kW fast charger I think it was. Depends on use - but we have not used anything other than the home charger since before Christmas... How much range do you need ?? - we're doing less than 100km per day and charge over night at home.

Surprised you missed out drunk drivers Malky... you're one of them...

Yes.... but I'm more surprised with you not showing any unhinged bias - perhaps because no Thai was involved you can't automatically blame a foreigner...

Try reading that again...

Then you are perhaps one of the very few people who carry their passport everywhere they go.... The document is far too important to be carrying anywhere outside of the home unless needed. The Dog-Tags are not a bad idea, but one would look somewhat like a wannabe ex-military fake-valour hunter... There are two options I have: - Insurance card in my Wallet. - ICE on my phone. The issue with the ICE on the phone is that not many over here are aware of it. ICE - In Case of Emergency: Without unlocking the phone my Emergency Contact is (i.e. Wife) can be contacted directly (via call).

Agreed... But.. If it were a 'farang boyfriend'... then we'd have pages of 'deport him' already... ... and of course the usual delusional bigoted hate from the obvious cockroaches... So... this post does serve to highlight that 'dumb shyat' also happens in more normal entertainment area's outside of the 'farang monger ghettos'..

I don't even know why they'd bother with that... they could just do the seatbelt up and sit over it. They're a solution to a problem that doesn't exist outside of the mind-numbingly idiotic.

Brilliant... Comments from you this week... ... You'd have hit the guy so hard he would not have got back up - Ultimate hard man. ... You've had more women than (Transam) has had hot dinners - Quite the lover you are. ... You are one of the most highly awarded and popular posters on this forum - quite the fool you are. That last one is special... very very special...

The Thai media reported it. The farang Aseannow media left out the nationality and other parts of the story. You are barking up the wrong tree. The Original source simply did not cover both sides of the story - an innocent error rather than anything planned - IMO... However, in reading the article it was clear something was not quite right.... info was missing and conclusions and battle lines were being drawn based on incomplete information. Below is the 4th or 5th comment in this thread: More to the story here... why only one side reported. That didn't stop the delusional forum bigot running away with it, like the cockroach he is.

Yet that left out the full story too.... AN simply sources from another media sources - thats all... it was the 'other article' which left out details which provide a more rounded snapshot of what happened. I've no idea why all the information was not provided in this case, as it was available. Nevertheless, even 'AFTER' knowing the other information (from teh Khaosod article) your delusional bigotry remains steadfast - no surprises there.

Yes, what really happened and what you made up. WRONG... ... What was reported in one article... And what was reported in another article. YOU have no idea what really happened, but you have made your mind up because you are so bias and bigoted.... You are simply blinded to any other possibility that a Thai might have been in the wrong. You are the most delusional poster on this forum - so entrenched in anti-foreigner bigotry are you that you are blinded to any intelligent balance...

Survivorship fallacy is when people only look at successful cases while ignoring failures, leading to dumb conclusions. It’s basic common sense that those who didn’t survive can’t share their experience.... so acting like success is the whole story is just ignorant. By focusing only on survivors, you have failed to see the full picture and that has lead to a flawed comment based on fundamentally flawed reasoning.

All Farang look scary. Don't get near them. Don't take the risk. Discretion is the better part of valor. I'm wondering where you two hang out.... Both Foreigners and Thai's all look perfectly normal whenever I am out... Where are all these 'scary looking farangs' you talk of ??

Indeed... People just go nuts on day 31, eh ???...

Please do not insult clowns. They can be very entertaining, unlike that poster. There, rewritten to protect the honour of clowns world wide !!!!

I think it depends where you are... If you are in an area outside of the main tourist entertainment areas - the attitudes of Thai's towards foreigners simply ranges from Polite to Indifferent... thats about it - we're nothing special, nothing negative either. ... and of course, bad news spreads... people love gossip, the jucier the better, especially when there is a controversy... ... Most of the controversy discussed on this forum is created by people blindly delusional to what may really have happend as we rarely get the complete story... 100% agree... We didn't get the full story which allowed the delusional idiot bigots to scramble to their soapboxes like cockroaches in a dumpster fire....

Of course you have... hilarious... such a ladies man with the brass.... The delusion is infinite with this walking dumpster fire of failed genetics, an insufferable, brain-rotted embarrassment whose mere existence is a testament to the failure of natural selection.

A significant part of the story was 'omitted'... i.e. where the Foreigner claimed the Thai had caused the accident and then hit him with his helmet.... Why was that left out ????? - why not tell the whole story ? Earlier on, people were suggesting there has to be more to this story than meets the eye... You, though - committed the foreigner to the gallows based on the heresy of one side - typical of your unhinged, delusional, bigoted bias.... And this MalcomB is why everyone laughs AT your comments, because you are so delusional...

Good I'm glad you picked up on that... It was written specially for you to 'bite at'... Now you understand there are two sides to the story - something I mentioned all along... And of course, I believe this could be possible too... because I'm not a ignorant bigot who blindly ONLY believes one story that suits their rhetoric. "somewhere in the middle is the truth" - I left it in bold so even a halfwit can't miss it... but you still managed to...

And what weight would that be ??? (muscle weighs more than fat remember !!)...

Weight safety distribution is a ridiculous myth someone made up - a few obese passagers make no difference when considering all the cargo etc... that idea is just someone really over-egging their argument. As far a 're-construct internal seating' is concerned - is that what Premium Economy is ???? Perhaps Airlines should instead offer... 'skinny seats' - narrower, less leg room etc... for those who are less than 160cm and less than 50 kgs etc ???... ... Where do we draw the line ?