rumak

I agree with you about "shady characters" everywhere . This is life, and I and most of us accept that "let the buyer beware" .... as well as simple things like don't walk on dark streets in a bad area at night. I start this topic because on my list of priorities..... health is number one (along with freedom ). Both are heavily controlled by outside forces , so much so that the idea of a "level playing field" for the average Joe is just a laugh. Medicine. Medical CARE ! I go back 60 odd years to remember when a person looked at me with empathy, with care, to listen to what ails me . My grade school classes in a fairly large town never had all these medical problems. Now, the whole world is on drugs . And the whole world, the more drugs, the more unhealthy they are . OK, easy to say...... it's the lazy lifestyle, or it's the food (both true) , and it can be discussed here . Unfortunately, it often leads to arguments between members. ON TOPIC : what specific experiences have members here had where the "Pro" did not provide a healthy solution, and was unwilling to listen to any feedback from the "internet patient" ......... (and ,share some alternative solutions that were found to work ? ) I did have some positive experiences with allopathic drs.(bone related). FEW. But, will talk about them in another comment.

thanks, more "on topic".... relating to the post about Paxil . Many more "examples" to follow in the weeks to come. Feel free to add you own cases where "healing the patient" with dangerous drugs or protocols has been falsely prescribed or mandated .

Well, i guess you could just post that comment on every topic that you feel it applies to . Having a positive outlook is very nice . " We know it is in there, just waiting for them to outnumber us once more. So be sure you are on the right side of the history, and not the wrong. Right now, it is hard to know who is worse, but I have my feeling one is more dominant than the other if we let them. " Maybe you can open your own topic ...... where you can explore and discuss who them, us, who is worse, who is better, and what the "right side of history" entails . Seems like could go on for many pages .

The story, which originally broke in 2015, is as old as “peer review” itself: a drug company (GlaxoSmithKline) wanted glowing results, so a helpful army of ghostwriters tweaked their study’s original results, massaged the incriminating data, and buried the bodies. Literally. The study’s authors either downplayed or outright concealed suicide attempts among teens taking Paxil. The resulting paper —if you can call it that— created an entire generation of “unexpected adverse events,” otherwise known as dead kids. And yet it had passed peer review. It was published in the BMJ. It had 21 co-authors— none of whom reviewed the raw data. It influenced medical guidelines. It made enormous sums of money. Then it exploded, leaving behind a familiar chalk outline: the corpse of scientific credibility. “Prescriptions of antidepressants to young people surged in the wake of the study,” one New York Times article said, blandly. In 2012, the DOJ got GSK to pay a $3 billion dollar fine —the biggest in medical history at the time— for falsely marketing Paxil to kids. Get this: to this day, in spite of the criminal fine and all the poor press, the BMJ has refused to retract the paper. (Just this year, a ‘notice of concern’ box was added to the top of the online version of the study.)

Today's tidbit : Don’t take my word for it. Take the word of the people who actually ran the journals. In 2015 —the same year the Paxil story broke— former Lancet Editor-in-Chief Richard Horton finally snapped, and blurted out the truth like he was confessing to siphoning gas from his neighbor’s lawn mower: Perhaps half. Half! That’s not a statistical signal or a confidence interval. It’s a crime scene report. Even the BMJ’s own former head editor, Fiona Godlee, admitted the field is “corrupted.” And not in the cute, old-fashioned way where the guy at the lab sneaks home a spare beaker. She meant intellectually corrupted— results engineered, journals captive, entire fields shaped by whoever has the fattest budget for “research support.” Third: former New England Journal of Medicine Editor Marcia Angell (who spent twenty years guarding the temple) finally conceded the high priests were selling edible miracles in bulk: It’s not possible to believe the research! That’s from the editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, not some random TikTok alien theorist.

Most likely only those of you who already are "off the beaten track" with regards to what transpires and is advocated, and basically forced on the public by way of rigid protocols within the mainstreet medical establisment system ................ will care to read some of my occasional posts here highlighting my reasons for not "trusting the science" . Meaning, being forced to accept as honest and truthful information regarding the "health care" we are offered (take it or leave it) by the servers of these set protocols, namely DOCTORS and Hospitals , who in ten minute "consultations" do anything but "consult" with the patient. Dictate is the word I would choose. I expect the usual trolls to laugh and thumbs down ... and maybe one or two present the usual paid for rebuttals from Google searches . The "choir" can just as easily pull those up , thank you, and on the General Medicine pages of AN the mainstreet believers can post without hindrance from us OTBT members. So hopefully the trolls and ad hominem snipers will just ignore this topic if not desiring or willing to just see another side of the subject .

You are definitely...yes definitely....playing by her rules . I can almost say that it is almost too late to change the game in your favor . Or, equal footing.... if that sounds better. She acts like a child . A manipulative child . And you are now the person she performs her manipulative skills on. And you let her . The bi-polar rollercoaster never stops ... until someone stops it. Parents allow their children to scream , and give them sweets to appease them. Once they grow up that way.... I'm not sure they will ever change . I know now why her "ex" is her go to comrade . He stayed around long enough, and probably knew how to mitigate her BS . Others just couldn't deal with it . What she has shown "us" in just a few days is plenty to make this assessment : Spoiled . Worst thing one can do is give heroin to a junkie who begs for just one more .

Cam, relax . This is all a game (maybe one you will need to get used to ) . I am pretty sure PG has the typical cute girl ADD . Nothing much interests them except playing with their social media devices. The time she spends following you on your silly (to her) walks, and restaurants, and ALL that talking ! Jeeeeez. Its only gonna get worse . Right now, just cool it and wait for the "make-up sex " . Seems like that is her go to hobby .

I am sure i remember that she warned you ! 3 periods a month ......... btw: i mean really, do you think this is normal behavior ? this is red flag number 28 in the "getting to know unstable, manipulating Thai women handbook " .

I have to say ..... many relationships (older Farang man and younger Thai woman/girl ) follow this pattern . Go back and read the Ai excerpt i posted . Almost always its the man who is caught in the web .... the killing smile . The instant sex . The "hansum" man. Some guys get lucky and in spite of the huge differences in culture, worldliness, intellect, emotional needs, expectations, life style preferences ... i could go on and on..... Well, it's more like a daddy daughter relationship . Not many survive once all the realities come to the surface . Some make it .

I just showed that to my friends .......

From your own personal experience and observations............ what percentage would you guess are "capable of thinking on their own " ?

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?tab=rm&ogbl#inbox/WhctKLbvMNcmpVQWChSgJqDSjLDGXNBtxlGVWBkrfsrXhLTVVkwMMvdbQHWXtMXCJCSqKKG (2nd smartest guy in the world) ....... well,open up in new tab for the whole article . my "comment" is below : "Plausible neutrality: People think the machines have no agenda, not realising that the models are trained to maximise engagement and satisfaction" That statement does not go far enough ! The models are TRAINED , absolutely . And basically all the major Ai systems are owned, and trained, by extremely large, MAINSTREET companies . For most "non-controversial" subjects, the information is fairly straight forward . But , and it's the Big But (no laughter please) ....... Any and All subjects where there are disagreements as to what are the True facts, who are the True experts, well.... the Mainstreet bias is alive and well. To mention just one example , which is of paramount concern ..... it's the narrative regarding what is the real definition of HEALTH CARE . It is no secret that the allopathic model and the mainstreet Medical Cartel are unquestioned in their dominance . Experts that find fault are of course referred to as "unreliable sources" spouting unproven theories. It's the same game as usual.... with the outright lie that AI is impartial , with no agenda. Who owns all (almost?) the Ai models that are "free" to access? Sure, Billionaires ! How can the high school team ever rise to compete with the elites ? The gulf gets wider and wider . I do know of one "alternative" , called Alter AI . Check out the results asking some "alternate" theories and opinions on the Covid / vax subject . Interesting. What would be great is if somehow a model like that could have a platform which somehow was widely known and easily accessible . Anyone think google would be interested in promoting it !!! Not .

there you go again ..... seems like you have the "problem" . what purpose does it serve to include your personal attack ?

why you keep bothering me ? go away most of the trolls have kept off this topic. why you wanna be one

"Habituation is the psychological process where the brain's response to a consistently available and predictable reward diminishes over time. In the early stages of a relationship, the partner is a novel stimulus, triggering high dopamine release and excitement. As the partner becomes familiar and predictable, the brain's reward and arousal circuits decrease their firing rate, reducing the initial intense desire and motivation to "secure" the partner." (thank you Ai) I'm sure we all look forward to page 100, or 120, or 200 ??? When the smitten Cameroni , after drifting downward , little by little ........ is faced with looking in the mirror, or maybe confiding to all of us "friends" ........ ........ "it just wasn't all I hoped it would be " . BUT WHO KNOWS ! MAYBE THIS IS THE ONE ! CAMMY , CAMMY, CAMMY !! (but you're only 54 . you really wanna settle down already ?? )

Not much competition....... is there ????????

If i posted her photo you would see a Kamen princess (in my eyes and a few others), someone far removed from the Chinese looking, white skinned types that you have shown. I always did like variety . Just get her address where she "will be" . Then take a long road trip to Si Saket and surprise her. OR, maybe you might be surprised !

digital ID implant ?? 🫥

Seems like you are prone to "insisting" . Hope you're not gonna go all Steve McQueen on her . 😄 . it's always been about insecurity , the need to control . If you don't realize that ....... oh, i forgot , you've got an answer for any comment not in line with your ego. Steve is not my hero . I have none. (btw) . He obviously had issues with possesiveness. Funny how that affects even the men that are seen as so desirable . (in your case, by yourself) 🤔 One day i will tell my story of the amazing girl that "went home to see her folks " .

only serves drinks ... only worked there for 2 weeks......... wants to go back to school and become a classical pianist ......

Cameroni leaned back on his 3500 dollar Italian leather sofa , happy for a brief respite from what has been a non-stop lovefest, unlike any other he could remember . And in his sexy Southern drawl , full of rapture, addressed his AN audience , "Let me tell y'all ...... this lovely creature gives a whole new meaning to "between jobs ".

he has it on auto-reply

what is it, day 4 ? and they're already in the I'm online.... you're online phase of the relationship . That's what happens when you go through all the thrills of meeting in a few days . Then? .................................... "uh, where did you put the toothpaste "

why do people ask silly questions? YOU are here reading this stuff ...😅