Jump to content

Bkk Brian

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    28,557
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

Everything posted by Bkk Brian

  1. I am not assuming I am reading the links provided and witness statements from those charged.
  2. Not heard that excuse from anyone. Second rate lawyers......lol
  3. Over 10,000 people turned up. It was planned. Try reading the links I supplied rather than making false asumptions
  4. No 64 court cases says they were not rigged. Read the article
  5. My post was responding to someone else who mentioned Capitol Hill. Those who feared for their lives, ie Pence, Nancy, all those who had to barricade themselves in including the secret service cared. On the election: Conservative group finds ‘absolutely no evidence of widespread fraud’ in 2020 election Eight prominent conservatives released a 72-page report Thursday refuting claims of election fraud in the 2020 presidential election in dozens of unsuccessful court cases brought forth by former President Trump and his allies. The group — which includes former federal judges, Republican senators and Republican-appointed officials — said they reviewed all 64 court cases Trump and his allies initiated challenging the election outcome, saying they had reached an “unequivocal” conclusion that the claims were unsupported by evidence. https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/3559758-conservative-group-finds-absolutely-no-evidence-of-widespread-fraud-in-2020-election/ Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign As reported by Reuters here , state and federal judges - some appointed by Trump - dismissed more than 50 lawsuits brought by Trump or his allies alleging election fraud and other irregularities. Independent experts, governors and state election officials from both parties say there was no evidence of widespread fraud. https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-courts-election-idUSKBN2AF1G1
  6. I was responding to your claim that my quote was out of context. It was not and very relevant to the crowd frenzy in Capitol Hill
  7. Why out of context? Link to it here https://www.marketwatch.com/story/dozens-of-jan-6-rioters-have-apologized-and-disowned-their-stop-the-steal-claims-01617410591 More on mob mentality here including Capitol Hill https://www.ntdaily.com/mob-mentality-is-manipulative-and-merciless/
  8. It can be both and more, "Psychologists have long observed how individuals in frenzied crowds seem to lose their sense of individual responsibility and become willing to engage in anti-social behavior they’d never contemplate on their own."
  9. Your opinion and that of the legal courts does not match
  10. They were there because they conspired to prevent the peaceful transfer of power in a democratic process. Yes they were there to overthrow that very act
  11. I would check your facts on that first: 928 people charged so far, many more yet to come At least 928 people have been charged in the Capitol insurrection so far. This searchable table shows them all. https://www.insider.com/all-the-us-capitol-pro-trump-riot-arrests-charges-names-2021-1
  12. Rubbish just because you have a conspiracy belief with absolutely no proof does not give you the right to do what happened on 6th Jan. To say they were there defending democracy does not help them in court where they have been charged and sentenced
  13. Cowards too scared to even show their faces. Biden is right on this 100%
  14. Jan 6th was never a threat to democracy, as justice would have prevailed in the end, however it was certainly a failed attempt to overthrow the democracy, is that plain enough for you? Is it also plain enough that had they actually got hold of certain members they were after we could have been looking at murder charges.
  15. Yes your minimizing what happened and continue do do so in every post you make. Where did I claim they were serious threat to the American political system? I thought I made myself clear when I stated that the right wing loons were not bright enough for that.
  16. Considering he did not even tell the court how many, probably because he didn't count them himself, then yes you can safely assume I don't know....lol Now whether a mass of guns more than he's seen since his day in the military means 50, 100 or whatever, you said it yourself they were lousy. About as lousy as your attempts to minimize what happened on the 6th Jan.
  17. & I've already answered you, a mass of guns more than he's ever seen since being in the military. But yes I agree they were fortunately not the brightest sparks at their attempts at insurrection. Since when have these right wing loons been anything other?
  18. Are you being deliberately disingenuous. He testifies to "a mass of guns" He had not seen that many since being in the military.
  19. Terry Cummings told the jury during the second week of the historic seditious conspiracy trial that he traveled to Washington with several members of a group from Florida, bringing his own AR-15 rifle and ammunition box to contribute to the Quick Reaction Force (QRF) allegedly established by the group in a hotel outside the city. “I have not seen that many weapons in one location since I was in the military,”
  20. "THAT is the difference between a riot and an insurrection" No that is the difference between a successful insurrection and a failed one. Had the Oat keepers got all their weapons that they had ready into the building then it could have been much worse.
  21. Total denial. There were hundreds in the building ransacking and smashing offices, looking for Pence with calls to hang him. Even a shout to shoot Nancy Pelosi. It only takes a few loons to cause mayhem. No firearms needed look at what just happened to Paul Pelosi
  22. Link to those false claims?
  23. Like this you mean: On Twitter, Trump said: “South Korea is finding, as I have told them, that their talk of appeasement with North Korea will not work, they (North Korea) only understand one thing!” It was the latest signal that Trump is losing patience with the international community’s response to the increasingly belligerent regime of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. Last week, Trump tweeted that “talking is not the answer” in terms of dealing with Pyongyang. On Sunday, Trump also tweeted that North Korea’s “words and actions continue to be very hostile and dangerous to the United States” https://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-missiles-trump-idUSKCN1BE0OB
  24. Total false equivalence, it was not a threat at Russia but a general stance on what any head of country with a nuclear arsenal must do if necessary. Truss said the duty was an "important duty of the prime minister", and received a round of applause after saying she would have no problem ordering the use of the UK's nuclear arsenal if necessary. https://uk.news.yahoo.com/audience-liz-truss-ready-press-nuclear-button-unleash-global-annihilation-103552126.html Got anything else?
  25. The blue tick charges are causing some backlash, Musk claims its the only way to raise money to solve the bots and trolls.....................lol Elon Musk reacts to Stephen King saying he won’t pay for Twitter blue check “$20 a month to keep my blue check?” King tweeted. “F–k that, they should pay me.” “We need to pay the bills somehow!” Musk wrote to King. “Twitter cannot rely entirely on advertisers. How about $8?” The company’s most recent earnings report showed a net loss of $270 million — a sharp swing from the $66 million in profit from a year prior. https://nypost.com/2022/11/01/elon-musk-reacts-to-stephen-king-saying-he-wont-pay-for-twitter-blue-check/
×
×
  • Create New...