Bkk Brian

yea right, lol, 7 different download papers and you read them all, yet claimed only the Executive Summary was there.

The full papers are there for download pdf format, do I really need to hold your hand and guide you through this? https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/

I take it you never read this which I posted for you in this thread: Feel free to dig in: SPECIAL REPORT: GLOBAL WARMING OF 1.5 ºC CH00 Summary for Policymakers https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/

Good to see she acts responsibly when traveling

Agreed that exactly why Scientific consensus is important: Do scientists agree on climate change? Yes, the vast majority of actively publishing climate scientists – 97 percent – agree that humans are causing global warming and climate change. https://climate.nasa.gov/faq/17/do-scientists-agree-on-climate-change/

Well the evidence suggests that was always her view, her last appearance there was one of utter disgust for those who were attending

Check the posts I was responding to. The poster claimed Greta may have changed her views, I was making it clear that was not the case at all. That's all.

Russia halted participation in the grain corridor for what it claims was a drone attack carried out with UK specialists (no evidence of course), nothing to do the destination of the ships. Seems to have been a plus move....lol Record Volumes Of Grain Leaving Ukraine Ports Despite Russia's Withdrawal From Export Agreement

New Report - Through six case studies, we show how the Russian military targeted civilian infrastructure in Severodonetsk. It's more verified evidence of how, despite denials, the Kremlin is breaking international law in Ukraine. https://www.info-res.org/post/targeting-severodonetsk-the-relentless-attacks-on-civilian-infrastructure-through-six-case-studies

Calling Putin's bluff. Following on from 12 ships yesterday, today 3 more grain ships left Ukraine ports, despite Russia suspending backing of the scheme. UN coordinating centre says ships movement was agreed by #Ukraine, Turkey & UN, while Russia was "informed." LOL https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63467042 Russia is ready to return to "grain deal" and allow bringing grain out of Ukraine if Kyiv guarantees the safety of the Black Sea Fleet in Crimea, - Russian media

Iran is preparing to send additional weapons including ballistic missiles to Russia to use in Ukraine, western officials say Iran is preparing to send approximately 1,000 additional weapons, including surface-to-surface short range ballistic missiles and more attack drones, to Russia to use in its war against Ukraine, officials from a western country that closely monitors Iran’s weapons program told CNN. The shipment is being closely monitored because it would be the first instance of Iran sending advanced precision guided missiles to Russia, which could give the Kremlin a substantial boost on the battlefield. The last shipment of weapons from Iran to Russia included about 450 drones, officials said, which the Russians have already used to deadly effect in Ukraine. Ukrainian officials said last week that they have shot down more than 300 Iranian drones. https://edition.cnn.com/2022/11/01/politics/iran-missiles-russia/index.html

Lies and conspiracey theories about the attack

How do you know he was in a position to simply walk out of the door? Just because you open a door means nothing if you have an attacker next to you. But the loon has already admitted to wanting to knee cap Nancy and cops witnesses the attempted murder. See what I mean about compelling evidence?

Self defense is a strange phenomina to you? Do you know just how close the attacker was to Pelosi when this occured?

Your claim was: You on the other hand have reached all your conclusions based on the statement of one police chief. That's just not true and your spreading misinformation again. Look at the many links already provided not going to waste my time providing them again The FBI San Francisco Field Office, the U.S. Capitol Police, and the San Francisco Police Department are investigating the case.

According to the affidavit, the hammer attack occurred as police were closing in on DePape. “DEPAPE stated that they went downstairs to the front door. The police arrived and knocked on the door, and Pelosi ran over and opened it. Pelosi grabbed onto DEPAPE’s hammer, which was in DEPAPE’s hand. At this point in the interview, DEPAPE repeated that DEPAPE did not plan to surrender and that he would go ‘through’ Pelosi,” the documents said. https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/feds-say-suspect-behind-paul-pelosi-hammer-attack-wanted-to-break-nancy-pelosis-kneecaps-so-shed-have-to-be-wheeled-into-congress/

I did: "According to the complaint, minutes after the 911 call, two police officers responded to the Pelosi residence where they encountered Paul Pelosi and DePape struggling over a hammer." Just because added detail is not contained in every report does not mean they don't sinc. So what do you believe was my question?

I believe what the statement says. What do you believe?

You on the other hand have reached all your conclusions based on the statement of one police chief. Its not based on the conclusions of just one police chief though is it. Another example of your misinformation. There have been multiple witness statements from all sides. All are in unison with the facts presented.

Not sure if this has been posted before but maybe a timely reminder that this involves real people. From Nancy "Our children, our grandchildren and I are heartbroken and traumatized by the life-threatening attack on our Pop," she wrote. "We are grateful for the quick response of law enforcement and emergency services, and for the life-saving medical care he is receiving. Please know that the outpouring of prayers and warm wishes from so many in the Congress is a comfort to our family and is helping Paul make progress with his recovery." https://www.cbsnews.com/news/paul-pelosi-attack-suspect-target-list-sources-say-nancy-pelosi-husband/

I suggest you wait then because your the one spreading doubt. The rest of us are giving facts

Until then you carry on with deliberately laying doubt despite ALL available credible evidence including from De Pape himself in police interviews yesterday who also stated his intentions for the attack. "During an interview with San Francisco police, David DePape told authorities he decided to break into House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's home to hold her hostage and break 'her kneecaps' to teach other members of Congress a lesson." I can see a pattern of denial here and like I stated its absolutely despicable.

“There is absolutely no evidence that Mr. Pelosi knew this man,” San Francisco Police Chief William Scott told CNN in an interview. “As a matter of fact, the evidence indicates the exact opposite.” But the explosion of social media posts discussing the theory shows how quickly conspiracies can spread.

Again, even after corrected from later reports they still believed thier own rubbish. The following day the reports were corrected from other sources, but too late, wild and baseless theories of a homosexual tryst have been making the rounds in conservative forums, even though Pelosi told authorities he had never seen the suspect before. Untrue assertions about how the attacker got in, the list is endless. Its not till today, ie the latest reports already posted that their lies seem to be dying down. Its pretty sad to see such desperation to justify their positions.

What are you talking about. That was a conspiracy theory, the journalist writing it even said its his opinion only. This was his disclaimer: "IMHO--in my humble opinion."