Jump to content

dinsdale

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    8,142
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dinsdale

  1. How do yoy know? Can you please show some evidence for this. When is 'recovered'? I think we would all like to know. Again, why did recovered increase almost 100% overnight. I suspect there was a change in definition. Might be wrong but I have an inquiring and rational tought process.
  2. Good on you. Hope you have your own futile life on here baiting away and not adding anything useful.
  3. Why would you monitor someone who has fully recovered?
  4. I'm sorry you're confused Olmate. There is a difference. If you are fully recovered you no longer need any medical assistance. What is now being classified as recovered many still need medical assistance. This has been said here by people with first hand experience and knowledge of this. But it's ok. You keep up your efforts to justify the junta oops government.
  5. Yep. Changed from fully recovered to recovered to suit the agenda. There was a brief moment when it was classified as released from care but they soon changed that. It was only a couple of days. I did point it out at the time when 'recoveries' virtually doubled overnight.
  6. Expert analysis rather than educated guess maybe? Fairly sure the folks who do this at the WHO and the Economist for example wouldn't take too kindly to someone saying you're just guessing albeit an educated guess.
  7. Best you look that up and educate yourself. I will help you. Google: How are excess deaths estimated.
  8. Campbell's latest video is well worth a look. It's about the under-reporting of deaths in relation to excess deaths globally. Very interesting. https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2021/11/02/the-number-of-people-who-have-died-from-covid-19-is-likely-to-be-close-to-17m
  9. As it should be. Double jabbed maybe trippled, PCR tested (?) so you would expect low numbers. The problem lies with the Thai populace which has low vaccination rates and infections way above the 'official' numbers due to an extreme lack of testing.
  10. Can't be bothered reading but how many were Thais coming home, expats and how many were actual tourists
  11. I do belive they said cold season would start a week before the end of last month. Tropical storm still happening in and around BKK. When the winds come down from China the season has changed in my non expert opinion. Not yet. This is not to say I do not value or trust expert opinion here in Thailand.
  12. I spelt accordingly wrong or something like that hence the edit. Why walk in if your not sick? I think @Bkk Brian gave what very good explanation to this. You think fewer are unwell and by this I'm assuming your saying unwell with Covid-19 and to this I agree. The question is though are as I said previously You also haven't shown where I said this. All my posts on this thread are above. Don't obfuscate your reply and just quote me where I said this. Very easily done if I said your words "you assume people are constanly sick, mildly or not."
  13. Please show anywhere where I said people are constantly sick. If you can't then stop saying this is what I said. It is a complete misrepresentation of my original post which was this ....
  14. No idea what that means. I'm saying people may be symptomatic albeit mildy and self administer an ATK test which may give a false negative or a positive. If it's a positive they may very well not go to hospital with mild symptoms and not report it. Not sure if I can make this any clearer. Of course there's also people who may be close contacts of a confirmed case who have no symptoms, so not sick, who need to go to hospital for a PCP test.
  15. This of course is the thing. People might be a bit sick now, give themselves an ATK and get a false negative either through the kit not detecting the virus or it was incorrectly done or get a positive but do not report it.
  16. Walkin numbers very low. Fairly sure ATK sales would be accordingly on the increase.
  17. Also said we have to learn to live with Sars-Cov-19 or words to that effect which I agree with. The caveat to this is at less than 50% double jabbed and of this 50% I suspect a large % needs a third jab it's too early to say we have to learn to live with this. Kids and teachers getting infected at schools (even double jabbed can still contract and spread) and taking it home is a real possibility.
  18. By fully vaccinated does that mean those who had 2 sinovac have had their booster? Anyway this is ourworld in data chart. https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
  19. Ok. Thanks. Thailand will be 70% double jabbed or triple jabbed for those who had Sinovac by years end. By, the way what or who is "the only opinion that matters has made the correct decision" in your opinion? Fair question. Can you elucidate?
  20. 30% more jabbed for 2nd jab in 2 months. Again this number doesn't take into account those jabbed with the Chinese vaccine who need another jab. For me I had 2 AZ 12 wks apart 2nd one recently (not the 3 wks to bolster the figures), so I should be good for another 6 months.
  21. I don't understand your post. Will Thailand in your opinion be fully jabbed (including those that need booters because they had 2 shots of Sinovac) by the end of the year? Just asking a question. What do you think? Personally I don't think so. Maybe the tourist spots but Thailand is not just the tourist spots. It's a country.
  22. And remember recoveries does not mean fully recovered. They changed that too to make things look better. How much else is changed and bogus to suit their agenda. I think quite a bit. Like I've said the RTDA comes out saying ATK needs to be in the numbers. Look at @Bkk Brian's chart and I think it's pretty obvious when the RTDA came out with their statement.
  23. Thing is they are bragging about the high double vaccinated rate but how many of these were doubled jabbed with Sinovac. Only 2.5 million have recieved a 3rd jab to booster the Chinese jabs.
×
×
  • Create New...