dinsdale

Ah! Dismissed out of hand without even looking at it. Not exactly the attitude of a scholar that's for sure. Just the opposite. Well you keep up that Harris negativity line as much as you want.

Worth a look.

So a person who has watched the podcast is wrong and you who haven't are right because you quote one article from the Independent which you claim must be correct because it's a "credible source."

Credible source and legacy media are not mutually inclusive.

I'm not sure it was because she was deemed good enough. More about virtue signaling IMO. What I reckon though is the Dems are regretting their decision. However, once again you use deflection which is your way when you have no answer. I said Trump is more presidential than and Harris who is in no way presidential (see above definition). I would challenge anyone to say that Harris is the more presidential of the two.

Did I say she is the president or did I say she's not presidential? There is a difference that you have failed to grasp in my previous post. Dictionary Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more pres·i·den·tial /ˌprezəˈden(t)SH(ə)l/ adjective relating to a president or presidency. having a bearing or demeanor befitting a president; dignified and confident. "America wants a president who looks presidential"

You've gotta be kidding. Trump is presidential. He has the track record. Harris is anything but presidential. Even Hillary Clinton came across as more presidential than this vacuous product of bureaucracy. This woman could be Commander in Chief of the most powerful military on the planet a woman that said there are no US military personnel serving in active war zones overseas.

Every American should watch this. If they do Trump is finished. Vote for Kamala.

How on earth can you think this is real. It is good though.

CNN goes hardball on Harris and she FAILS. She also FAILED to answer the direct question of funding.

What America needs is a strong, articulate leader that can get their message across clearly and take charge that's why I would vote for Kamala.

Time for your afternoon nap.

The Independent is legacy media. Do you not know this? Pro Harris anti Trump and again no where in the interview/chat did this happen. I've watched it twice. Joe Rogan asked Donald Trump for specifics on how 2020 was stolen. Then could only laugh at the answer This is from the article but keep in mind that the entire podcast was pretty light hearted and convivial. Laughs happened on more than one occasion. Even this little hit piece I didn't see in the podcast. Joe Rogan could be seen laughing as he pressed former president Donald Trump for specifics on how the election was stolen in 2020. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/joe-rogan-trump-podcast-stolen-election-b2636115.html

How about this for a qualification. I'm pretty sure on his CV (not that he needs one) the first item would be The 45th President of the United States of America 2017-2021. This is about to be knocked down to 2nd position being replaced by The 47th President of the United States of America.

MSNBC is also called a credible link which puts the whole thing of what is a credible link into question. The legacy media is credible only to to brainless sheep that believe unquestionably what they are told and have absolutely zero critical thinking skills.

Which is what people have been doing and have found no evidence supporting her claim that she worked there. McDonalds has no employment records of her ever being employed by the company. This IMHO seems pretty definitive.

Again show some evidence that everyone saying she didn't work there are wrong. Show your support for Harris and produce the evidence (evidence not produced by Harris herself and evidence not found by anyone checking into this) that she worked there. She said she worked there and everyone should believe her is not good enough. She lied and has been caught out. Simple as that.

Adults having a conversation is all that happened. There were no disparaging remarks or laughter directed at the other. There was mutual respect between both of them and mutual laughter. What you have attached is pure clickbait tripe. If you think Rogan laughed in Trumps face please post the time stamp and the corresponding section of transcript. You won't do this because you can't. It doesn't exist.

It's not guesswork that she failed her 1st bar exam it's fact. She's not too bright and only those of a similar ilk would think she is.

I think you should scroll back and see how she went with her bar exams. In brief NOT GOOD. As for her positions well there are rumours but lets not go there.

Overthrow an election? Maybe genuine concerns of vote rigging and saying people can protest peacefully which is their right to do so. By inciting race hatred well I guess if Kamala hadn't let in millions and millions of undocumented illegal immigrants this wouldn't be a topic of conversation. Trump says anyone can come in but come in legally. Stripping women of their rights? Trump has consistently said his policies are not anti-abortion and along with this he wants to give women their rights back by keeping biological men out of women's sports. As for the Ukraine war show me anywhere that Trump has supported Putin in his invasion of Ukraine.

Again I bring you back to burden of proof and not having to prove a negative. You obviously do not understand this concept so no point flogging a dead horse.

No need to carry on with the Harris lie about working at McDonalds. That was put to rest with Trumps magnificent political stunt. Everyone (except the stupid) knows there is nothing to support her claim.

She is running for the Office of The President of the United States. She said she worked at McDonald's but this by all accounts is false. If she worked there why hasn't she just come out and said so with supporting evidence to silence the critics? As for more important matters do you mean attacking Trump because she can't articulate policy or even answer simple questions or getting as many woke celebrities to endorse her as she can (didn't work for Clinton) or maybe undoing her complete mess of the borders and illegal immigration?

Ah! Here we go. Your usual personal attacks when you know you are wrong along with a nice bit of deflection. So very predictable.