kwilco

Sea level rises and property Some misled people have cited a perception that seaside properties are still being developed and selling without any regard to rising sea levels – this is not true and warnings have been issued – in the UK alone it has been pointed out that 200,000 homes in the UK are at risk due to rises in sea levels in the next 30 years. Estate agents and vendors are either unaware of the risk or fail to point it out. Some of the areas most at risk include North Somerset, Sedgemoor, Wyre, and Swale. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jun/15/sea-level-rise-in-england-will-force-200000-to-abandon-homes-data-shows “head of the Environment Agency, Sir James Bevan, that many homes would be impossible or uneconomic to save, and whole communities would have to move inland,“ [Published by University of East Anglia, published in the peer-review journal Oceans and Coastal Management.] In Queensland where floodable areas are clearly mapped and available to the public real estate prices have taken sea levels into account for at least 3 decades. This paper in the US examines prices and the public’s reluctance to heed warnings of SLR to the established rises. - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10669-022-09842-6

these are not the records used to establish this - they use evidence going back 100s of thousands of years- I'm surprised at how little you understand.

You realise that isn't a counter-argument? (i expect not), it just supports the concept of MMCC

Even Exxon Mobil knew about and accurately predicted climate change back in the 1970s The science is unavoidable – denial is the only option left https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-64241994

thats what appears to be the case.

Yes it is 97% - where have you been? "Yes, the vast majority of actively publishing climate scientists – 97 percent – agree that humans are causing global warming and climate change. Most of the leading science organizations around the world have issued public statements expressing this, including international and U.S. science academies, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and a whole host of reputable scientific bodies around the world. A list of these organizations is provided here." https://climate.nasa.gov/faq/17/do-scientists-agree-on-climate-change/#:~:text=Yes%2C the vast majority of,global warming and climate change.

It's the science - compared to that, your opinion is worthless - it isn't even an opinion, it is a demonstration of how little you understand about the topic.

How do you expalin tht - ae you saying it is caused by those facotors or those are the power bases refusing to act on it?

Not true - the frequency of extreme events is perfectly proven, itis part of MMCC. However attributing and indicidual event is not relevent - in fact it is only argued by denir=ers who cite that "it has happened before" - the frequency is not done just on current reporting it is done on an analysis for records over teyears....for instance researching the events stored in layers of ice on the poles which work as perfect records for weather, climate and other events.

public protest is part of any democracy - unfortunately many people seem to hae forgotten this. It is interesting to conpare the British protestors to the ones in France at pesent....or even in Thailand.

Seriously? And what criteria are you using to come to this conclusion?

"over population" is not a simple matter of numbers - it is when a population is consuming more resources than are being renewed. It is also regional - many countries have a reduction in population. THe negative effects of a large population are in reality directly linked to climate change as in areas where this is having a more profound affect, it puts greater strains on the population.. the term is often used by recisist to justify their opposition to immigration.

My guess is that China is increasingly fearful of its citizens travelling abroad as the may encounter "the other side of the stroy" as promulgated by the government itself.

Police roadblocks and attempts to enforce the law is a waste of time - they are largely ineffective. It is just the riders who need educatiing, it's the police and the road safety authorities. Helmet wearing needs to become a way of life - for 22 million or more people who use M/Cs nearly every day. I notice in some areas the wearing of full face r higher spec helmets is now becoming a status symbol and that helps. They have to overcome the idea of aan M/C being the cheap convenient transport for the low-incomed and get it recognised as a potentially life threatening device. Even if they achieve 1005 helmet wearing it will onlt affect a certain number of deaths on M/Cs - whether this number is significant or not remains to be seen only after the wearing becomes universal. Although I'm hugely pro helmey wearing oe mustn't loose sight of the fact that it isn't a cure-all for motorcycle deaths.

I agree with you observations but your conclusion that it should be illegal is HIGHLY illogical..... all drugs should be discouraged but it has been should over decades that prohibition has no beneficial effects apart from finding organised crime - if you see that as beneficial

So you don't drink either?

All recreational drug use has problems and casualties, but the most dangerous of all is alcohol causing depression, anxiety, psychosis, and antisocial behaviour,....just read som the answers on this thread.

This sort of nonsense was pumped out by the US government in the 1950s. It is now just laughable nonsense.

So you claim to have witnessed a correlation between violence and cannabis?..... this is only you or can you back that up with any factual evidence. I'd like to know how you observed this and cane to that conclusion because in short, I don't think you can

So can you tell us is so harmful about it?

What a baseless response...like talking to a naughty 12 year old

So what's your "fair" judgement..?

So...tell tasteatlas... gumbo is a stew with African origins but just saying its better is a sample of one...I expect that tasteatlas used a bigger sample...or maybe just dreamed it up in the office?

I think your the kind of bloke who thinks a joke isn't funny until they have explained it. Food actually does have a form of taxonomy or family tree and a few absolutes also a clue can be in the method of cooking involved... e g. Boiling, baking, frying roasting or STEWING.

Vipers are called "lazy snakes" as their modus operandum is to lie in wait. Unlike other snakes they tend no to move off when they feel vibrations As a result they are just about the most common snake bite in Thailand and other countries.. bite is potentially fatal.