BangkokReady

I answered every reply, the onus is on him to support his claim. I called what you are doing a witch hunt, with this other oddball, I simply asked for a factual claim to be supported with evidence. But keep lying, it's all you have. 🙄

Lol. You're literally continuing to do the same thing that you're claiming is an overreaction to point out! 🤦‍♂️

But there is. It's in the rules, plus it's considered the done thing when making a factual claim. Overwise, people assume you're making things up. Which it seems that you are... 🤷‍♂️

You're "pretty sure" but you cannot confirm? It sounds like you're not sure at all. If you were sure, you would be happy to provide the source that supports your claim. It's up to you if you cannot be bothered to substantiate your claim, but it makes it very unreliable.

I'm not sure if what you are claiming is correct, so I suggest you check it and provide a source. This is typical when making a factual claim.

Are you sure it's that, not if they travel for that specific purpose? Do you have a source?

Even though the girl claims that she didn't cheat, he still faces a murder charge? Was there ever any chance that that would have any effect on what he was charged with?

Possibly his ego is fuelled by giving to others. Everyone is different. It probably makes him feel happy. Obviously if they don't give anything in return and show fake appreciation, then it's a bit false. But if he enjoys it and views it as him taking care of some underprivileged people, then what's the harm? Obviously, it would suck if they came over to him one day and he didn't get his wallet out and they immediately walked off and stopped paying attention to him. It is possible that the act of giving brings him joy and he wants nothing in return, other than a thank you. Some people even find joy in just making other people happy. I think it all depends on how you're raised. One problem is when someone like this encounters another person who is simply an unhappy person. They can be quite upset seeing another person being happy and bringing joy to other people's lives.

"Say you agree with us or face the consequences" is a textbook example of a fascist witch hunt.

It doesn't. You're lying to try to manipulate people. I don't want to play your fascist witch hunt games, sorry.

Avoiding the topic? I specifically addressed what I was commenting on. You don't get to force people to say and do what you want through threats of shame.

Agreed. People seem to be losing the plot.

Sorry, you're not really making any sense. I'm not sure what any of this has to do with me stating that it's not unusual for 16 year olds to not be living with their parents. 🤷‍♂️

What does this even have to do with the comment you are replying to? There's something wrong with you. You seem unable to understand or form basic sentences.

How does one brandish a top? I actually think they might be doing this on purpose to drive engagement.

Please stop lying about me just because I exposed your mistake. It is very childish.

No they aren't. Yours are. Liar.

What does that have to do with a comment about how common it is for 16 year olds not to live with their parents in Thailand?

Never mind...

16 year olds not living with their parents. It's a lot more common in Thailand than in the West, but many don't realise this cultural difference.

How so? Someone mentioned 16 year olds not living with their parents, I commented on that, you failed to understand a simple comment, then made a fool of yourself. Nothing weird about me pointing that out to you.

What are you talking about? The comment I responded to was about 16 year olds not living with their parents. Why not read the actual comment before replying? That would save a lot of hassle. 🙄

That doesn't mean that the comment I responded to said that. Why would you think it does? Why not just read the actual comment? Weird people on this thread. 🙄

You've heard many Thais take issue with 16 year olds living away from their parents?

JFC. I'm not sure how anyone can actually be this dense, but I guess this explains a lot of your previous posts. What do you mean "we are talking about"? I replied to one poster who was responding to another, talking about a particular point. Not related to children or sex (not that all under 18s are children anyway). As I said, please check again (and when I say check again, I mean check what was actually being discussed, not what you think some people on the thread are talking about).