BangkokReady

In your opinion.

Perhaps he wanted a little sympathy?

At a temple no less! I wonder what the men had planned if the 13 year old girl hadn't gotten sick...

Exactly what I was thinking while reading the article. They make a lot of money from tourism, and in many cases there aren't huge overheads, so it should be fairly straightforward to reinvest. I think, perhaps, they're thinking that if they can get a new pot of money to maintain and develop tourist attractions, then the income generated by tourism becomes pure profit for them.

When I used to use a steam room, the idea for me was to stay in there as long as possible, which meant until I felt dizzy. Definitely should be someone checking them regularly. I think the steam room had an emergency cord.

They probably know that they would quickly become disgusting and be inhabited by homeless people. There are very rarely free to use public toilets in Thailand, probably also for this reason. As wonderful as Thai people are, they don't really like following rules or laws, nor enforcing rules or laws, as a result, there needs to be no choice but to comply.

It's a very interesting topic, which rouses a number of different reactions when discussed, which is also quite interesting to observe. Personally, I find it quite interesting how some people (not you) often seem quite angry at the idea that a man having sex with a ladyboy isn't gay, and seem to need to aggressively argue that they are. Probably something going on there.

Soon to go the way of the real Detroit, perhaps.

That is not a near-death experience.

I have a feeling that the OP meant "a Thai romantic partner".

Ctrl+Z?

You used to be able to have meth legally? (And probably enough to mess you up if you took them all at once.)

That's certainly one possibility, but it doesn't seem cut and dry. Neither can be completely ruled out, and it could vary from person to person.

It's merely your opinion that it is a fact of nature. I'm surprised you don't realise this. (In fact, you don't seem to fully understand what fact or nature actually mean.) If a man believes that someone is a woman, then how can he be gay for finding "her" attractive?

All are free to post whatever they want, within the rules. Stop trying to talk down to and control people to try to make yourself feel superior. You can simply scroll past comments you don't like.

I did no such thing. I made the exact same statement as you, but with the opposite opinion. Your opinion is different to mine, but it remains just that, an opinion. You can't weasel your way out of this one.

Lol. Nice try at distancing yourself from your behaviour which is literally being criticised here.

The fact that you visited the topic, read the comments, then felt the need to reply shows that you clearly care. Stop trying to make out that you are better than others, when you are doing exactly the same thing. It's very immature.

Again, I don't really understand how that would help you explain the warnings you received about how to spot a ladyboy.

Men attracted to what they perceive as women, are clearly straight. That's a fact.

I'm not sure what you mean. I asked what you were told to warn you that someone might be a ladyboy, and you said you wanted to re-enact being given the warnings with my girlfriend? I'm just not sure how that would work, or why you can't just tell me now.

Just because I said that men who like ladyboys might not be gay? What a weird response.

I agree, you cannot cope with people proving you wrong.

You'll do a re-enactment of how you would feel about having sex with a woman with a man's body, with my girlfriend? I'm not sure you understand what a "re-enactment" is, as you seem to think that you can "do one" in response to a question about something you heard or think. Your responses don't make much sense.

You'll do a re-enactment of the warnings you had heard? You can't just say what they were?