Evil Penevil

Sheep

I have a feeling he won't be able to answer your questions or mine. Let's see if "reverse psychology" works.

Blues

Kind

Why are you calling him deranged? Hamas has been declared a terrorist group by the U.S., the U.K., the European Union, the 35-member Organization of American States, Canada, Australia, Japan, New Zealand and others. Twenty-six countries or regional groups list Hezbollah as a terrorist group, although some only regard the military wing as terrorist. Are the government officials of those countries deranged as well? Hezbollah and hamas have openly called for the destruction of the state of Israel in their maanifestos as well as public statements and inerviews with the goups' leaders. What exactly in your opinion did @Nick Carter icp get wrong for you to call him deranged?

Bird

The development of the full English breakfast as we think of it today is an interesting chapter in food history. Like so many food trends, the concept of a big morning meal originated with English royalty, was copied by lesser nobles and the landed gentry, then spread to the (economic) upper class and on to the middle and working classes. But it didn't happen overnight; it took about 600 years for the full English breakfast to take the form we recognize today. As breakfast slid down the social scale and into the bellies of the broad masses, it became a much simpler and smaller meal. Bacon (and/or sausages) and eggs emerged as the focal point of the full English in the early 1900s, mainly for practical reasons of concern to hotel and restaurant kitchens as well as home cooks. Bacon and eggs were cheap to buy and easy and quick to fry. Almost all the components of the full English are fried, the one outlier being tinned beans. According to the English Breakfast Society (https://englishbreakfastsociety.com/english-breakfast-recipe.html}, the ingredients in a full English breakfast for two should be: 4 Pork Sausages 6 Strips Of Back Bacon 4 Eggs 1 Tomato 2 Cups Of Mushrooms 1 Can Of Baked Beans 200g Of Black Pudding Tea or Coffee Fresh Orange Juice 6 Pieces Of Sliced Bread (two of which are fried, the others are toasted) Selection Of Newspapers Prep Time: 5 minutes Cook time: 30 minutes Yield: Breakfast For Two NUTRITION FACTS: 750 calories and 55 grams of fat per serving. The Web site also maintained beans should NOT be served on the same plate as the other components and gave this photo to illustrate. I added the yellow arrow).

Mouse

Under

Adultery

Artery

Thin

Yes, it certainly does. There had never been an independent kingdom, nation or state called Palestine before the PLO declared the creation of the State of Palestine in 1988. Arabs living in Mandatory Palestine had been offered a state under the 1947 U.N. partition plan, but the Arab League rejected the plan. What Israel took over on May 14, 1948, was the territory allotted to the Jewish state under the United Nation's partition plan for Mandatory Palestine, which at that time was under British control. Before the U.K. received the Mandate for Palestine from the League of Nations, the Ottoman Empire had ruled the region we today call historical Palestine since 1516 CE. Prior to the Turks, the rulers had been the Mamluk Sultanate; Ayyubid Dynasty; European Crusaders; Fatimid Caliphate; Mongol Empire; Abbasid Caliphate; Umayyad Caliphate; Rashidun Caliphate; Byzantine Empire; Roman Empire; Seleucid Empire; Ptolemaic Kingdom; Achaemenid (Persian) Empire; Babylonian Empire and Assyrian Empire. You have to go back to Biblical times and the Iron Age to find centuries in which people who were actually born in historical Palestine ruled the region. That would be the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah. . "After Roman times the name [Palestine] had no official status until after World War I and the end of rule by the Ottoman Empire, when it was adopted for one of the regions mandated to Great Britain." https://www.britannica.com/place/Palestine https://x.com/BryanLeibFL/status/1712594390445617178

How and when did Arabs acquire Gaza?

The police investigate and if they believe a violation of the law in terms of incitement to action has occurred, they will pass the evidence on to a prosecutor, who will determine if it warrants prosecution. The prosecutor presents the case to a judge or judge and jury, which will decide if the defendant is guilty.

"Venuspeenis" has been identified by one Web site as a 24-year-old trans activist who lives in Portland, Oregon and was previously active in Antifa. https://thepostmillennial.com/andy-ngo-reports-portland-trantifa-extremist-who-issued-death-threats-against-nancy-mace-and-j-k-rowling-identified Some background info and photos here: https://ghostarchive.org/archive/hZxHC?wr=false The video threat against Mace can be seen here: https://voz.us/en/politics/241120/18331/nancy-mace-responds-to-trans-activist-s-death-threats-he-seems-like-really-nice-guy.html

Choke

Former

Magic

Plants

Green

I don't have any expertise on the topic, but my take from across the Atlantic is that it would depend on the circumstances. The U.K. law on hate speech specifies the words must be intended to provoke violence, not merely that there's a possibility they could. To use a classic example, shouting "Fire!" in a crowded theater could result in criminal charges, but writing "Fire!" in an X or Facebook post wouldn't. It's not the words themselves that violate the law, but their intended effect. However, since the example you gave doesn't include any incitement to action, it would most likely be OK as an expression of opinion on the Internet. If you spoke the words in London, it could depend on the circumstances and to whom you were speaking. If someone reported your speech, the police, prosecutor or judge/jury would have to decide on your intent.

Leaf

UNRWA is indeed a clown show, but Palestinians aren't laughing, they are starving.

Syrup