Jump to content

citybiker

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    774
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by citybiker

  1. Need to bring back Margaret Thatcher.....the alliance with Ronald Ray-gun was second to none!

    I'm not sure even Maggie could handle British politics of today.

    Anyway, as for the American-British debate part.... I still enjoy visiting America, it's customs, traditions and its people (not music though sorry)

    Bangkok, Pattaya, Hua Hin or elsewhere, personally I've never had an issue.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  2. Thanks. #2 fails completely (I think it is simply not recognizing that there is a disk in there, so the eject button has no effect and shaking it sideways does nto help)

     

    For microsurgery using a paper cl;ip I will wait until I am better rested and perhaps more desperate

     

    I really think the issue is that it does nto read the drive as having anything in it. If I could address that, the eject button might work...

    My diagnosis head on (bear with me)

     

    A, Might be a faulty dvd reader then, you say device manager is not identifying disc.

     

    B, If it were me, I’d get a mini torch in the slot or ask a technician to briefly look & check it out.

     

    C, Lastly, worst case scenario is going to be costly as it’s fixed within the body & you know what that means.

    @lemonjelly

    Your not alone there.

     

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  3. I think some of the Brits are upset at the U.S. ( for good reason) for dragging them into that absurd invasion of Iraq by that idiot Bush.

    Other than that reason the Brits do seem to have hostility problems most likely related to a  smoking and drinking lifestyle 

    The majority of ‘intelligent’ Brits know who enemy no1 is in reference to that issue, my Tony Blair probably one of the most despised men in the U.K. although I agree the pair of poodles Bush & Blair are idiots.

     

    I spent my fair share of time in that dusty AOR to know a good working relationship between the US, Canadian & Dutch troops during those early Telic days.

     

    I’ll never forget departing a plane at Baghdad Int Airport to be immediately approached by two US personnel & sharing a brew within the confines of the safe area before departing to SC area.

     

    (Apology for thread drift)

     

    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  4. No. Chavs tend to use a better standard of cologne.

    Could be worse, a sweaty chav ;-)

    As for cultural conflicts, overall I tend to socialise better with anyone overseas, hardly had any issues that I recall.

    Although airports can be tricky....


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  5. I live in Scotland, plenty of chips there.

    In Thailand i avoid dodgy people irrespective of nationality


    Chips with or without the devil juice?
    (I’ve spent plenty of time in most Scottish cities to know)

    In Thailand, depending on area anyone outside a biker bar is considered dodgy ;-)




    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  6. Without being provocative here’s goes.

    Originally a Scot so I can only comment on English, Welsh & Eire (both sides).

    In previous experience I’ve not had many issues with US or Canadian per se.

    Drunken arrogant English with a chip on their shoulder quite possible, but not IIRC Soi 7 area depending on time year can get a little lively however I’ve not witnessed any conflicts.

    Walking street end might be a different matter though.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  7. I think both sides are interested in minimizing there losses.
    The biggest problem is the tight negotiation time.
    As it turns out, the UK as well as the EU has nothing to give away for free in the negotiations.


    The negotiation time for Phase 2 (trade) will be very questionable indeed, especially if you compare the EU's previous examples with Canada & Japan.

    The EU (Barnier) will continue on his hard ball stance, although that isn't part of his mandate, his job is to ensure a mutually agreeable situation is achieved/concluded prior to being approved by the other MS's. Unfortunately, he's also made it clear no cherry picking as of course other MS's will not be happy.

    The U.K. Isn't seeking anything free, however also not being punished is also the aim, which no matter how much Brussel's continue to deny, is their aim......to avoid other MS from considering going the same route.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  8. Post #33 is a fair analysis.

    The EU is still yet to face challenges that will affect the remains MS, fiscal being the prime issue and when individual states face possible reduced benefits along with other MS having to increase subscription's the harmonious Brussels will have no choice but to prioritise self reform.

    I won't hold my breath, however the UK will be watching it unfold from the terraces.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  9. And you  believe that the UK can on the whole get better terms than did the EU? You think nations that trade with the EU and its vastly bigger market are going to want to annoy the EU to favor the UK?

     

    I’ve never stated the U.K. would get better terms, simply allowed to trade ‘beyond’ the EU on its own T&C, vast difference.

     

    Other Nations & it’s own businesses will do whatever is in its ‘own’ interests, it’s called competition.

     

    As for Poland, it’ll surrender to the EU policy makers and accept the vote sanctions as it has little choice, even though Tusk previously admitted the EU’s immigration quota system (which the sanctions originate) was failed & it should be for individual MS to resolve, interesting that Hungary and other Countries already done that.

     

     

    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  10. Yes, sure. Making "unrestricted" (whatever that means) trade deals is so much easier when your bargaining power is based on representing 60 million people compared to a block of 350 million people....:coffee1:
     

    EU trade is 45% (est)

    So the remaining is 55% & I emphasise, EU trade won’t cease overnight.

    Unrestricted means not having to comply solely to EU trade rules.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  11. Well done EU in standing up to what's happening in Poland. And if the Poles don't like it they can up and leave and join the UK in forming an ex-EU club of pitiful nations who must abide by almost all of the EU rules but without having a say.

    Big difference being, Poland can’t afford to leave the EU and Brussels is fully aware of that fact, despite Poland being part of the V4.

    https://inews.co.uk/news/charts/much-uk-pays-eu-much-get-back/

     

    Ex-EU club?

    Pitiful Nations?

     

    Total nonsense, it’s the capacity & ability to make unrestricted trade global deals & bearing in mind the Brexit talks are ongoing & EU trade won’t cease due to the deficit.

     

     

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  12. Type of Biker that’s old enough to know my limits but also not fearful of experimentation.

     

    As ‘the prodigy’ & traction control team owner Keith Flint says, on the track if you don’t come off at least once your not pushing yourself or the bike hard enough.

     

    KTM, Triumph & Honda owner rider.

     

     

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

     

  13. An Austrian MP weighs into the Brexit issue, it appears nearly all political environments have spineless people who fear rather than accept difficult challenges lay ahead.

    Brexit should be cancelled, Austrian prime minister Christian Kern says - The Independenthttps://apple.news/A7LAjv-1yQhmrcKGi7i23cw

     

    Those politicians that accept defeat or say some political issues are too difficult should maybe consider their careers & allow those that are.

     

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

     

  14. The Eire case you cite was the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty. When first presented to the Irish, the deal was very poor and was rejected. The deal was then improved considerably (to the extent it led to Ireland being regarded as a tiger economy for many years) and a second vote on this totally different deal was done. The Irish, wisely, chose to accept this and prospered.
     
    Surely, even the maddest Brexiter should welcome a second referendum so they can approve or reject the deal before taking the plunge. After all, it may not be to their tastes and it would allow them to reject the deal and force a better one, or at least one that appeals to their nature more.

    The EU had an opportunity when CMD went to Brussels, admittingly both sides were arrogant enough to believe it would be business as usual, so his deal proposal was treated in contempt & virtually laughed st behind closed doors.

    The EU have learnt a harsh lesson, it’s 2nd largest net contributor won’t be taken for a ride, the ‘majority’ of the YK voting electorate made its decision, as for mad Brexiteers?

    That’s a typical stamping its feet Anti-Brexit remainer mindset, as I’ve previously stated no 2nd referendum required.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  15. While I'm a big supporter of democracy (which is why I don't like the EU), I don't understand what last night's vote will achieve. So let's say the UK government complete all negotiations with the EU, in say Jan 2019. The EU member states all agree on the terms. So we're all good.
     
    What happens if Ken Clarke and his greedy chums decide to vote against the deal?  It will be too late to renegotiate with the EU.  So will we leave without a deal and revert to WTO rules? Do we get our €45bn back? That sounds pretty good to me.

    IIRC the figures quoted for the Brexit Bill (methodology) hasn’t been mutually finalised it’s simply the U.K’s outstanding liabilities.

    Besides, anything else also comes with conditions attached so the EU are fully aware they’re not getting it all there own way.

    Especially as Brussels we’re attempting €70-80 (est) even though it wasn’t legally enforceable.

    A HoC final Brexit vote will also be accountable, transparent as its taxpayers money & the government are fully aware everything is in the small print, along with any caveats.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  16. UK should have a second referendum, it is becoming quite clear the country would be far worse off, than in. 

    Total Absurdity to consider a 2nd referendum just because the minority disagree with the result, the U.K. is not Eire just because Brussels disapproves of the result too.

    All the doom & gloom of the U.K. is yet more project fear and so far proved not only inaccurate & also highlights and focuses on experts models and forecasts as questionable.

    The HoC defeat is part of democracy, I don’t agree the way the Tory (reman element) done this however overall, that’s still democracy for you.

    Not directed at you per se however some people really need to get a grip, time to move on.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  17. Now that's an interesting point! UK passport holders or those normally resident in the U.K.?
     
    One benefit of registering in another European country is that your pension is not frozen if you spend much of your time in Thailand!

    UK passport holders should be unaffected (unless someone else has expert subject matter knowledge) I can’t see HMG making significant changes that will just over-complicate the current system or either place an unnecessary burden.....yet.

    I travel periodically & I just plan & research accordingly so not to get caught out.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  18.  
    Currently, EEA nationals who do not meet the requirements of the Freedom of Movement Directive can be denied entrance to the UK; So I see no reason why EEA nationals should be treated any differently to all others post Brexit. Except for those covered by this agreement who will be resident in the UK on the date of Brexit and their families. The same, of course, applies to British citrizens who will be resident in an EU country on the date of Brexit.

    Yes of course, also British passport holders (which will be biometric types)

    The latest U.K.-EU ‘joint report’ is rather full of creative adjustment narrative, however phase 2 is likely to be very uncomfortable, and not from the U.K. side either considering the surplus element.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  19. Its not just the UK food industry that needs 'controlled, qualified immigration'

     

    The financial service's sector

    Hotel & hospitality sector

    Event industry

    And if the NHS and other specialist care sectors.

     

    A very close friend is a care home manager on 40+k and she regularly has trouble retaining staff within her industry.

    The over reliance of agency workers is an ongoing challenge, and this is qualified and experienced staff.

     

    The food processing industry will always require cheaper (unqualified labour) irrespective of their nationality.

     

    Make work pay properly, deter & limit those seeking only a welfare state lifestyle and make it an temporary emergency safety net only until they return to work and contribute to society instead of becoming a drain.

     

     

    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

     

  20. So true. That is exactly why Britain is on this constant high alert for Islamic terror, which will keep escalating until their numbers are reduced. May has done nothing at all to prevent this terror.
     
     http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/10055613/Labour-sent-out-search-parties-for-immigrants-Lord-Mandelson-admits.html

    I work within this field & immigration is only part of the problem.

    Homegrown radicalisation
    Insufficient border controls
    Online prevention

    The list goes on.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...