John Drake

No, they will not. They'll just have opinions that reinforce their own self-interest, which is often in direct odds with American citizens' self interest.

The fact is that everywhere and every time the abortion has come up as a referendum for a popular vote the anti-abortion side loses. I don't understand why people cannot admit that linking Trump to his supreme court picks who overturned Roe is precisely what has put him and Republicans into a losing position.

A reason to vote for Harris, clearly, is the right to abortions. It is the single most reason she is beating Trump right now in polls.

Ask an anthropologist. I don't know. I really don't think it matters. Eating your political and tribal opponents in any circumstance is pretty much off the scale as far as I'm concerned.

I really can't understand your posts. You seem to think I "name called" you a physician.

Do the British engage in cannibalism? https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-07-24-mn-19379-story.html

Agree. There is only one subject that is out of bounds in Thailand. The political indoctrination that this story discusses in subjects such as mathematics tells you how thoroughly totalitarian the UK is becoming. Thailand is much, much freer.

Then, you should see a physician.

Confusing and incoherent, Earl.

This is the reason she is going to win. Trump could only beat one Democrat, Biden. Harris can only beat one Republican, Trump. It's clear Harris is insecure, with much to be insecure about. Walz is pretty much a fake at every level. Trump is a terrible person and a worse candidate. Vance, on the other hand, seems quite normal and bright, but I can't accept all his natalist policies and anti-abortion extremism. There is really only one sane alternative, and that is RFKjr. I wish Tulsi was running. She is actually better than RFKjr. Maybe next time. Tulsi has already annihilated Harris in a debate. Tulsi is a fabulous candidate who ran to the aid of her country at a time when Walz was skedaddling in the opposite direction.

This is the entire Walz game plan. He implies he's a war veteran, tries to legitimatize his fake rank, and then when caught at it, claims he never said that. Unfortunately for him, he eventually began to believe his own press releases and claimed actual participation in a war zone. This man is fake.

Excellent. I don't care about Trump. His loss and four years of Harris-Walz could make an entire set of more able candidates available for 2028. Tulsi, Fetterman, DeSantis, or RFKjr.

Trump is an utter failure as a human being and unreliable, self-centered narcissist as a political candidate. He's all that, but he didn't try to pose as a soldier or make fake claims about a war record. The horrible characters of these two presidential teams, btw, is another reason to vote for RFKjr.

It's not about me. It's about his own commitment. Stop trying to offload Walz's lies and exaggerations on those of us simply reading his record.

Walz could have hit the beach near Naples.

Tulsi Gabbard stepped down from office in order to deploy in a war zone. Tim Walz did the opposite. Tells me everything I need to know about the integrity of these two people. https://www.pbs.org/weta/finding-your-roots/about/meet-our-guests/tulsi-gabbard

China controls the Mekong and thus China controls Vietnam. Malaysia has already declared for China. Singapore is leaning that way. Only the Philippines stand as a loyal American ally in ASEAN. All of Indochina, Thailand, Myanmar, and Malaysia have declared for China.

He'll be too embarrassed to ever leave home again.

Pictures look like the afterwards of an attack of locusts.

This is precisely what happened in Laos starting about 8 or 9 years ago. Chinese just moved in en masse, around 800,000 in a country of 7.5 million people. Ignored any legal or visa requirements. Crossed the border, set up shops, businesses, schools, and that was it for Laos.

Walz is an EEL. Exaggerates, Embellishes, Lies. This issue isn't going away, because it gets to the heart of Walz's character. He is inauthentic, a faker.

There's something else in there that is sort of dodgy. All these stories about Walz as a football coach. When I hear that phrase, "football coach," I automatically think "head coach." Somebody like Tom Landry, Don Shula. I don't think "assistant" head coach, Which is what Walz was, apparently. https://www.newsweek.com/tim-walz-minnesota-coach-mankato-west-1936599

Did Vance receive combat pay? Did Walz? That's how you determine who was in combat. Their pay stubs will tell you.

I didn't make claims. I asked questions.

Easy to settle whether Walz was lying about being deployed to a war zone or not. Did he receive combat pay? Did Vance? If both did, okay. If only one of them did, then somebody is lying.