JBChiangRai

Why should they? The weed shops knew Recreational use was not intended and their business is probably 100% recreational sales. You may take advantage of a loophole, but you don't bet the farm on it.

Toyota Alphard available in 2.4 Hybrid or 3.5 v6. both petrol.

Recreational use was never intended, Anutin made that perfectly clear in June 2022. Weed shop proliferation is sheer stupidity, they knew they were chancing their arm and now they will go bust.

Be very careful, your managing bookings might involve collecting money and forwarding it to your employer - that makes you a money mule (money Launderer) and equally as guilty if it's a scam.

It was his postman

Is that what your postman wants? Spice it up, why not!

I certainly won't buy an ICE vehicle again.

You don't need a bank, you can use a solicitor in the UK.

Money doesn't buy happiness either, but at least you can be miserable in luxury. If money can't buy intelligence, does that mean you can be stupid in ignorance?

The EV might be worth more than the Fortuner. Shouldn’t you have asked for an extra column on the spreadsheet for number of fires?

No, not yet

Yes, so it says both good and bad.

Strange comment? Are you smoking something?

Deflection

3.3.1.2 Studies that show culpability Several studies have found that cannabis users are more likely to be responsible for crashes (OR 1.7).80–82 Crouch found that marijuana use contributed to the demise of 168 fatally-injured truckers in all cases in which the serum concentration of THC exceeded 1 ng/mL.83 Terhune’s study of 497 road traffic accidents found that cannabis users had a responsibility rate of 76% versus 42.5% for the control group. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2722956/ Paper titled “The effects of alcohol compared with cannabis on driving.”

It’s not down to me, forum rules, say if you make a claim, you have to produce the data.

1 baht per km is about right, you got good mileage on your fortuner, my Benz was 5 baht/km

I disagree, please share your data.

There is no UK tax because he’s tax resident in Thailand and the company made no profit. His tax liability is in Thailand and there is none because it’s remitted in year following earning.

Not true.

How useful!

Comparing different intoxicants is not what we should be doing, it’s off topic and deflection.

It's not deaths that is the issue.

My good buddy is a grower, he's invested over $1M US in his operation. I advised him not to do it. Why should him growing weed affect our friendship? I am not anti-weed. He can afford to lose his investment, we're both wealthy guys and we discussed other ex-pats like myself going in with him and I advised against that too in case it goes South, as it looks like it might. As I said before, I am not against recreational use of cannabis subject to some safeguards. Those safeguards don't currently exist in Thailand. As for gaslighting, Anutin himself said recreational use is illegal, whether the current framework of the law reflects that, I can't say, I don't know what other laws he was referring to. I only call people out when they make erroneous statements like Cannabis is not addictive, it's ok for adolescents, it's safe, it doesn't cause psychoses or violence.

On a serious note, I see a skin doctor at the Government Hospital in Chiang Rai every 6 months for liquid nitrogen treatment on anything pre-cancerous. He did remove some moles for me at the same time. Typical cost per visit 100-500 baht, never more than that.