Chomper Higgot

Easily dealt with. Let the world’s press in and let them do their job of freely investigating and freely reporting what they see.

I think that’s ’in another thread’.

Yes is called protection women’s right to make their own health choices. Your freedom of speech stops at the surface of anyone else’s body. Now go for coffee.

He will. The chaos and uncertainty his idiocy gives rise to will harm investment in the U.S. and give rise to costs to US consumers. Insider traders however will make a killing.

Ill-informed nonsense, the EU’s common economic area was created by removing tariffs for those nations that joined it, those nations that didn’t, and the one that left, don’t get the membership benefits of zero tariffs.

Donny will U-Turn, like he always does.

Back to topic: “BBC Faces Backlash Over Alleged Bias in Coverage of White Farmer Killings in South Africa”

Let me demonstrate the bias in your statement: Alleged bias is allegedly breaking the rules of the Royal Charter.

During wartime the U.S. has relied heavily on foreign intellectuals to develop the means to win those wars. I’m not sure on what basis you claim America is done with anything, let alone the things you personally are consumed with.

Feel free to offer your suggestion for alternative news sources.

I’m not sure why you need to talk it up. On the relative thing, most sexual abuse of children is by relatives. “Familial abuse accounts for some two thirds of all child sex abuse, though the true figure could be even higher due to under-reporting.” https://www.gov.uk/government/news/unseen-evil-sex-abuse-in-families-going-under-the-radar-say-inspectorates

Who said I was referring to myself? My question was “Who said it was limited to only the numbers under the Erasmus Scheme?” Having read through the thread I have no idea who you were referring to, I thought perhaps you might enlighten us all.

Yes all those things are examples of attempts to undermine the BBC fir reporting stuff some don’t want to be presented to the public. Attempts to discredit the BBC are not uncommon, here’s an example, there are others: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/04/chinas-communist-party-ran-campaign-to-discredit-bbc-thinktank-finds#:~:text=It describes a “coordinated effort,deepen and expand existing divisions.

Or at least U.S. corporations did.

People trying to make business plans must be loving this.

“Our negotiated deal with the United Kingdom is working out well for all,” Trump wrote, referring to the recently finalized trade agreement between the two countries. “I strongly recommend to them, however, that in order to get their energy costs down, they stop with the costly and unsightly windmills, and incentivize modernized drilling in the North Sea, where large amounts of oil lay waiting to be taken.” Nice deal you have here, it would be a shame if you didn’t do something I want you to do that causes me to reconsider our nice deal.

I’m sure you’d be at the front of the queue to volunteer, but do take care with the needle, we wouldn’t want you accidentally nuetering yourself.

It’s also wrecking the thriving economy Trump inherited from Biden. Though good for those engaged in insider trading.

You complain about VAT while calling for tariffs. Have thought that through… at all?

Trump doing his best to encourage patriotic Brits to back their own government against interference from foreign despot.

The genocide of white South African farmers myth exposed as the lie it is “South African police recorded 26,232 murders nationwide in 2024, of which 44 were linked to farming communities. Of those, eight of the victims were farmers.” So 8 South African farmers murdered in 2024 equating to 0.03% of all murders in that year. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-makes-false-claims-white-genocide-south-africa-during-ramaphosa-meeting-2025-05-21/

It would be so much better if it were owned by a billionaire, perhaps a foreign billionaire? The BBC is hated by some on the right precisely because it broadcasts news and documentaries that expose stuff they would rather were replaced by ‘celebrity gossip’ or ‘fluff pieces’ for the rich and famous. A national media not controlled by the Murdochs and Musks of this world is a very good thing.

Who said it was limited to only the numbers under the Erasmus Scheme?

How did that work out?

Reading the text accompanying the picture informs that it is indeed ‘painting a picture’.