Chomper Higgot

I think the correct term is to insinuate, but even that would be only one possible answer to the question I asked, there are others.

It is my honestly held personal belief that nobody dealing with cancer, or who has dealt with cancer, personally or in a loved one, would post the overtly offensive remarks on Biden’s diagnosis that you have. They are however consistent with your venomous posting history towards Joe Biden.

Hats off to Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), who deserve the credit for their bipartisan effort to get this Act passed.

All of a sudden a mere question becomes a lie. Or is it a question you don’t like for some reason?

Trump wants us all to talk about Biden’s health. The question is, why?

Said without one iota of introspection. Your first paragraph is an accurate diagnosis for what you served up for the second.

The youth mobility programs are aimed at students and young people who want to work in the UK/EU for a limited period, they eventually leave. This was true of thousands of young Europeans who while the UK were in the EU came to the UK to study or work for limited period before returning home. These have now been replaced with permanent immigrants from Asia and Africa.

You’ve gone awfully coy on what you wanted.

To be fair, that’s you telling us what you say was said on the French news.

Under this deal British fishermen can sell their catch to EU customers without the delays due to import checks introduced by Brexit. No delays, fresher fish, higher prices. Removing barriers to trade helps British fishermen trade.

I did, thanks for the correction.

Absolutely, and as I observed a couple of weeks back, Trump’s attack on the UK economy (cheered on by a number of the forum’s Brexit supporters) made the UK drawing closer to the EU an inevitable necessity. The EU is Britain’s largest and closest trading partner, it makes absolute sense to remove trading barriers.

He hasn’t rolled back Brexit. None of the things in this deal were listed in the Brexit vote.

Unicorns and warm sunlit uplands, a glorious trade deal with the US, immigration suddenly halted and £350 million a week for the NHS. Non of which materialized.

Peanuts compared to the cost of Brexit: https://news.sky.com/story/brexit-new-report-suggests-uk-311bn-worse-off-by-2035-due-to-leaving-eu-13046256

Removing Ted tape and restrictions placed on the British fusing industry by Brexit is absolutely the right thing to do g to do for British fishermen. The damage done by Brexit needs to end: https://www.westcountryvoices.com/how-fishing-was-gutted-by-brexit/

He’s extending by 12 years the fishing deal Johnson negotiated and in exchange getting lots of goodies for the British economy. Even British fishermen do well out of this deal, the removal of restrictions on exports to the EU will re-open the opportunity to sell their catch in Europe, an opportunity they were robbed of by Brexit. Add the benefits to British farming, security, access to EU defense spending and re-entry to Erasmus, it’s a great deal. It’s well past time to peal back the damage the Tories did under cover of Brexit. Starmer is on it.!

Says a guy who made a fortune singing songs written by somebody else.

The art of the kneel.

The would be Sparkbrook, for the real thing.

So right now in the U.S. climate anthropogenic change denial is government policy. You’re perfectly on board with those not adhering to that policy to be put permanently out of work? And if they are not are you willing to accept your claim to be false?

You’re catching on. Trump wants his version of the ‘Enabling Act’ Unrestricted power, AKA a dictatorship.

Let’s be fare, he’s not a drunk.

There you go with your accusations of lying, accusations founded in your own ignorance. “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt14-S1-1-2/ALDE_00000812/

It’s being attempted via the Supreme Court. His appeal to the SCOTUS regarding birthright citizenship is a direct challenge to give a President the power to override explicit clauses within the Constitution. The SCOTUS has already ruled he can’t be prosecuted for criminal acts if conducted as part of his Presidential duties. If he is then permitted to ignore the Constitution his power is beyond the control of the judiciary or Congress. “I shall be a Dictator on day one”