Chomper Higgot

“Now he [Farage] has said he was told not to hold the face-to-face meetings with voters, traditionally held on the last day of the week, for safety reasons. But parliament’s security services have disputed the suggestion he was given that advice, which would interfere with his democratic duties as an MP.” https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/nigel-farage-reform-mp-surgeries-b2615759.html

Gawd she’s got some amazing powers.

She’s single, she does as she pleases within the law. And you’re not the mutaween. Well, not yet anyway.

Self proclaimed ’Black Nazi’ Mark Robinson is now hemorrhaging staff from his campaign team. When your nasty online persona follows you to your day job, it’s a lesson some only learn the hard way: https://www.politico.com/news/2024/09/22/mark-robinson-campaign-staff-resign-00180418

The AI generated attendance, nah nothing to get excited over.

Shame on her, rich, intelligent, talented articulate, and with a huge following. Lots for you to hate there.

Pure projection.

I never had you down as a fan. It seems you hang on her every word.

Let the board decide based upon on your posting history

You made reference to California law. Odd how you can’t produce a link to the law you referred to. I can, but in this case it was you that cited a California law, so it is for you to provide a link to that law. What an earth are you rambling on about? Whatever it is it isn’t going to get you out of the hole you dug for yourself. Now let’s have a link to this California law you referred to? Link or be owned.

By all means, and since you asked: https://www.tortoisemedia.com/2024/09/20/robert-jenricks-top-donor-received-loan-from-untraceable-bvi-firm/

A bit of hatred towards the working class going on there.

By reminding us all of the far greater Tory money grubbing. Thank you.

What on earth are you on about. UK? Muslims? Sharia law? You people? Masochists? What has any of that random nonsense got to do with the topic of discussion? Refer to the top of the thread for a clue as to the topic under discussion: “Kamala Harris Blames Trump Policies for Deaths of Two Georgia Women”

A fixation on the relationships of a woman you’ve never met tells us a lot about your character.

You’ve just demonstrated rightwing hypocrisy and you produced the evidence yourself.

It was you that introduced this ‘law’ into the conversation, but when challenged to produce a link to it you fall flat on your face. You made the claim, you get to at least try to back it up.

It’s better than that. Trump’s supporters, both foreign and domestic, engaged in several years of attacks against Biden, consistently arguing he was Both an easy candidate to beat and not the Democratic candidate they wanted their cult leader to face. (Figure that). Then they got what they wanted, Biden was replaced. Now they really aren’t happy.

Well you do.

There are a lot of laws in California. So how about you linking the actual law, the statute itself and not some rightwing misinterpretation of the law. Post a link to the actual law and let us read it first ourselves.

Nobody supports ‘Baby Killing’. A bit less nonsense might help you construct a rational argument.

Abortion is not infanticide. Counter factual zealots are definitely not the target audience while I suspect a large number of FOX views are women some of whom might be able to ask the question ‘what does this mean for me?’

Now all you have to do is grasp the gap between policy and outcome.

A few edited moments.

He’s made the same argument in another thread in defense of ANOther tyrant. Its his thing.