Chomper Higgot

1. “as it was intended for Jurists to not be stained by corruption” Well that’s not gone too well has it? 2. “If Federal Judiciary held lifetime seats, they would not feel the need to"repay" anyone or any party, and could make rulings based on their interpretation of the Constitution.” But if they did feel the need and or had fallen short of #1, then they have a life time to enjoy their corruption. 3. Engage that UC Berkeley Constitutional Law thing of yours and explain precisely what in President Biden’s proposals warrants this assertion: “Stripping the ability of the Judiciary from "checking" the excesses of the Legislative Branch would be the beginning of real totalitarianism in the US.”

It’s because you don’t understand that there was no cult of Biden.

I think you were directly replying to the post you actually replied to.

I’m sure you’ve been told a million times not to exaggerate.

of course you were:

Actually it wasn’t my idea, it was Callum’s.

Not content with the Christian faux outrage over the representation of a pagan festival, you engage in imagining alternatives causes for outrage. You’ll never slate this thirst, it’s all of your own making.

Can you provide a link to back up that claim or are you making an unsubstantiated assertion? I’ll not hold my breath for your link.

Put your specs on and re-read my post. And next time try not to embarrass yourself:

That’s incorrect. They need, at the time of application for a visa and later upon application for indefinite right to remain, meet minimum income requirements. Thereafter, they need meet no such income requirements.

Well I would agree with you on the point of the police having too many powers, but suspect Yaxley Lennon and his supporters were very much in favor of the knee jerk terrorism laws. He, and they, perhaps thought those laws would be reserved for others. Handing power to Government in reaction to a perceived threat is seldom a good idea.

Neither does Ella Emhoff, she is a model. Go on show us your pic, I promise I’ll be woke about it and not body shame you.

But we are now in a time when a convicted felon is a candidate for the Presidency, and that’s only a fraction of his ‘baggage’.

Feel free to post your own full body view photo.

I think the correct term is ‘carpet bagger’.

Non of which will change until corruption of the SCOTUS is addressed. President Biden has picked a policy that has broad public support, but which threatens all the powerful interests you mention. My expectation is this proposal will face a concerted push back from the hyper wealthy and their shills, but if it gains traction with the electorate Harris will add it to her platform. The timing is perfect.

Refer the top of the page, there’s something about ‘World News’.

Piers who?

Here’s the message: If you want to reform the SCOTUS, which a clear majority of Americans do, vote Democrat across the whole ticket. It’s a very smart play.

Now?

So you didn’t read the OP. Give it a read and let us know what particular parts of President Biden’s proposal you object to and why.

Refer my comment above about the timing of this announcement. A d please, less of the projection.

Because he suggests something that the majority of the public agree with?

I’m busy this morning so let me address just one of your statements. “You support Trump because you don’t want a ‘packed court’”

Despising Trump is not hating the U.S., despising Netanyahu is not hating Israel. Opinions differ on which are ‘the best nations in earth’.