Bday Prang

The missis was on the phone to the daughter a few days ago and HBO was mentioned but I have no idea how it compares, Used to have an HBO channel years ago when we used the UBC before it became True but there was a lot of repeats The app may be different The best thing about netflix for me other than the huge variety is the various language / subtitle combinations available and not just for her sake, I don't have a fancy 5.1 surround sound system and I think that may be why sometimes find that the voices are drowned out by the sound effects especially in the "big" movies (tv series generally are ok ) Anybody else noticed that?

I was also enjoying it free as were a few other members of the extended tribe, courtesy of the wife's daughters husband who put the app on my smart tv and gave his password to various other family members last time they came over here pre covid Eventually Netflix caught him out and banned him So I have just opened my own account. the Cheapest netflix "package" is about 99 baht if I remember correctly , but i think it only allows you watch it on a mobile phone ,however I think you can download but its 480 sd the films too There's another package that costs around 165 bht and you can watch it on various devices including a tablet or laptop or TV, most expensive is around 400bt its all on the website Have you considered sending it to your phone / tablet or laptop and and using the screen mirroring function to send the image to your TV. Most smartphones and even windows 7 laptops can do it but win 10 is easier They did it here once when the wifi on the TV started playing up halfway through a film Just a word of advice , it might be worth going for the 165 bt package, which includes TV as an option, as they may have a way to stop you screen mirroring the phone only package. I encountered something similar in the UK with Virgin media and I could only send the Sound to my tv and not the picture as the bloody thing could tell my TV was not a "mobile device" Yes you can just sign up online, I think you need an email address and mobile phone no as they send you a one off txt message with a security code to put into the app there's no minimum term and can cancel at anytime. I'm also old school but its easy enough

Spot on about the steroids, I hadn't thought about that, "juice heads" as we call them in the UK can often be very aggressive one minute and almost suicidal and in tears the next. Wonder if it will show up in a post mortem ?

To fight back against who exactly? The Laos navy ?

How do they know that he did not grow it himself ?

In the way of what ?? Anyway the only useless piece of skin hanging off mine is...well, me I suppose

But they grow back a foreskin cannot

"Some women" allegedly saying they they prefer it is not a reason to force it on a kid

I have heard of mastectomies being recommended following the identification of a rogue gene but that is totally not the same

But its not medical reasons is it other wise all would be encouraged to do it and that is not the case is it?

I could never be with a woman who could not accept and love my foreskin

And how many of these are removed "ritually"

I'm not telling them what to do , I am questioning what they should be allowed to do. and yes I am happy with my carcinogenic bacteria containing excess skin, I'm more worried about my prostate at my age, although I doubt there's a free initiative for that in Nong Pru If science was so sure and so concerned why have the male population not received advice ? When is national circumcision day ? Or is it a secret kept between the "enlightened" cut community

Any such procedure should always be undertaken in a medical environment certainly not in a local mosque or synagogue that's for sure

Banning it for grown men, could, just about, maybe, possibly, be considered religious intolerance in the crazy world we now live in . Banning it for babies is completely different and totally right. Allowing it to continue is just plain wrong, they are not allowed to do it to girls anymore, and nobody argues about that, So in these days of equality why are they still allowed to do this to boys. Times are changing , jesus we are living in a world where rightly or wrongly there are now, many, what used to be everyday words that if spoken aloud could either put you in prison or start a riot some cartoons have provoked extreme responses. people get offended over nothing, and others lose their jobs and careers sometimes just for telling the truth. Many things are getting "banned" day in day out because a minority feels "offence" Why on earth is this male genital mutilation allowed on babies of any faith , colour, or creed , ? Why have these children not been identified as "Vulnerable" (god I hate that word) everybody else seems to have been. Is no one looking out for them, In years to come they will look back in shame on this, Discussions like this are how it starts

The generation of Americans you refer to were also snipped due to religious reasons in many cases , It was alleged to discourage masturbation, that obviously has its roots in religion, Quakers, Puritans etc it wasn't only a cleanliness issue that was just another excuse the god botherers came up with to validate their real reason

Very well put, and lets not forget that the arrogance of some of these unelected civil servants leads them to follow their own woke agendas and not necessarily follow the official narrative of the governments they are supposed to represent. That happened with some UK civil servants recently and when they were called out they started crying and said they were being bullied forcing the resignation of a government minister. Thankfully the UK appears not to have been involved in this unwarranted intrusion into the affairs of an independent sovereign nation. The Eu was mentioned extensively in the OP , are the diplomats representing their elected leaders and their electorates or as I suspect the unelected bureaucrats in Brussels?

You are probably right, but its not the cocks its the unconsented mutilation of them that is winding me up. However enough is enough I've got stuff to do, ....after I've washed my filthy foreskin of course, and offered my apologies to the missis and any other women who I've made to feel nauseous over the past 40+ years

Women really don't care, most are ambivalent,

That's probably only because it's more difficult to do before birth

Must be true then I'm surprised a study was even considered necessary

The truth?? Look, if I had ever experienced any such anti foreskin sentiment or indeed found the possession of my foreskin in anyway a hindrance to sexual encounters with women I would have had it removed years ago But that has never been the case and I have never heard of anybody else ever who has felt the need to do so. If you are happy with being "less than complete" and it works for you that's fine but it does not give you the right to advocate the "procedure" being inflicted on non consenting children Am I right or wrong ?

Unlike all circumcised men presumably ? did your mother tell you that too ? you appear to be getting desperate, are you beginning to have doubts due to the overwhelming opinions of others? That's only to be expected

Do you pay less, being circumcised ? You'll be telling us you get it for free next lol

women don't have a foreskin