Bday Prang

so why did they legalise alcohol ? this has nothing to do with either

for the benefit of educated people who know about this sort of thing

And they call them corrupt and inefficient ? I won't hear a word of it

Have we been drinking already today sir ? Making up for yesterday are we? perhaps You should sit down, before you fall down!

keep it away from the missis and any family too, by the six degrees of separation theory they all "know" somebody who works in a bank, anything is possible here, anything at all

that may not have suited him at the time, perhaps?

taken from the link....."The Home Office confirmed it currently has no plans to change the classification" So basically more nonsense being spouted by the OP who is trying to promote his outdated views with more hysterical mis-information. A reclassification would not work well for that governments "popularity" The promoters of reefer madness are a dying breed and i personally hope there is a well deserved seat waiting for them in Hades

Well that's a good question and I don't really feel comfortable asking the source of their "wealth" as i don't know them that well, but whatever they are doing they must be very successful at it as they don't seem to have suffered any negative effects due to Covid or the destruction of the tourist industry

There are a few in our village that never work who seem to be doing just fine

that goes for all "dusit" polls

won't help us either

They also have smart phones often own brand new motorbikes as do many of their kids, some have pick-ups too They are not all poor in the village where I live There's combine harvesters and tractors too, all new or new ish

Seems bizarre considering the opposition to "smacking" due to it being "so barbaric

but not on the same day

Whilst my feelings regarding other peoples foreskins are what i consider to be a healthy mixture of revulsion combined with indifference I'm quite attached to mine , and intend to remain so as indeed are approximately 91.5.% of "people" from the uk apparently As far as women's feelings are concerned I can only judge by what i've been told when discussing the matter what leads me to believe is that most women don't actually find cocks stunningly sexy and irresistable in the way men find female genitalia irresistible (quite the opposite) and they couldn't care less as long as your clean, of course if your cut, women will tell u they prefer it, and the same if your not, women are like that Seriously Its not something i ever really thought about but other than medical reasons I can see no reason to allow the ritual circumcision of babies in the name of some imaginary deity in this day and age. Nor to be allowed do it for some dubious health benefits or to alleviate what appear to be some serious personal masturbatory hangups . It should be allowed but restricted to over 18's along with Drinking,Smoking Tattoos and Piercing, or any other form of permanent self mutilation. and never be performed under duress or with out consent

My mother told me that my father intended to have me circumcised but she had persuaded him to cancel. however she told me that as a result i needed to do my best to try and keep it clean, what could i say but "thanks for the tip"

My parents decided to get my brother circumcised in order to stop him from masturbating , it wasn't very successful, they couldn't get him to stop for long enough to allow the doc to apply the anaesthetic, never mind carry out the procedure

And are therefore useless

Even weirder if he had it grafted onto his own uncircumcised knob

I pity the traveller that has to sit near a freshly circumcised kid they scream badly enough when their ears pop

I don't think the government is actually proposing this , in fact I read they had issued a denial, it was a proposal from some police forces. they were trying to blame cannabis use for their appalling crime figures and this was their ridiculous proposal to improve things

need more than a "rolling eye" emoji for that one

Girls can be done too but not sure how much usable skin could be harvested

A mate of mine got cut to slow down his acute premature ejaculation, There were complications and it didn't look good for him, I went to visit him but they wouldn't let me see him, I asked the doctor if the op had been a success but he said it was still "touch and go"????

Not a very convincing article I nearly stopped reading when | got to this bit.... "Circumcision became popular in the Western world in the late 19th century, when people began performing the operation in an attempt to prevent masturbation." So there must be some sort of evidence to demonstrate that masturbation just isn't as much fun! Isn't that something similar to why the religion of tolerance and peace like to do it to women? and just before that bit there was a list of benefits to encourage the practice ,No 4 made me laugh out loud ... "4. Injury As the foreskin hangs over the penis head, it may sustain an injury. For example, the foreskin can catch in the zipper of jeans and trousers. So other than disease which can be avoided with basic hygiene . Masturbation which can be stopped by wear boxing gloves in bed and injury which can be avoided by just being careful or wearing button up flies there just doesn't seem to be a very strong argument at all for this amputation to be forced on babies except maybe in cases of medical emergency oh but there is one more compelling reason (from the same article) Who writes this kr@p? "a family history of circumcision, so a person may decide to continue the tradition" when they are 3 months old ??? behave