IvorBiggun2

My mistake but the Blue book can be obtained at the local Amphur without a police report.

Not really. I just think there's 2 sides to all stories. Until the truth comes out it's all speculation. And in the end we're not going to know the full SP. It's a dead story from the start posted by the forum for our entertainment. Same goes for the Pit Bull thread.

6,000 Baht is chicken feed to someone who drives a Lamborghini. He was probably quick to help the woman because if she didn't have the Por Ror Bor insurance she'd have had to pay in full before leaving the hospital. Also she may not have had the 6,000 Baht? Plenty of answers and plenty of questions to come.

Standard practice.

On par with Thai drivers Pit Bulls are insignificant with regards to being a danger to others. Do we ban all Thais off of the roads because of statistics? Of course not. We implement a stricter training regime where by Thais hopefully conform. The same could apply to dogs that fall into a danger category. My belief it'll be easier to get the Pit Bulls to conform.

Have you got confirmation as to who hit who? Apparently a 6,000 Baht sum was given to her, lets say, for medical expenses. If she had the Por Ror Bor insurance she'd be covered. So with her being offered 6,000 Baht I'd go for the fact she didn't have it and therefore shouldn't have been on the road. All speculation but it's what I believe and what I think. Up to you how you interpret it.

When involved in an accident leave it to the insurers to deal with it. That's why you have them. The guy covered her hospital bill as far as I believe. In my book he's done nothing wrong. Her, that's a different matter, she appears to have no insurance from my understanding and therefore shouldn't have been on the road. Whether he change seats has to be confirmed. I'll wait for that confirmation.

I totally disagree. Definition of a pet please? You've obviously never owned one. But you've read a lot of misinformation. So there you go. https://www.britannica.com/animal/pit-bull

Welcome to Thailand.

Is that a yoke? I mean a joke.

Paying money to a person in Thailand is not an admission of guilt. It's the way Thais cement over problems that aren't problems if you get my drift. It's expected that the more affluent person will pay, or offer, compensation. It's the Thai way.

https://www.thailawonline.com/en/property/thai-house-book-yellow-and-blue.html Obviously my station refused to do it.

My wife says 'no need'. Could the OP comeback on 'report'? https://magnacarta.co.th/home/faq-section-2/house-registration-book/

So the question has to be asked. Was she mistaken about changing seats?

Is a Lamborghini left or right hand drive? And which side did the driver(?) exit?

She didn't pay but the other driver coughed up 6,000 baht to cover her injuries it appears to me. Obvious she didn't have Por Ror Bor insurance or the PRB would have been suffice. She should not have been driving full stop. She's now trying to cover her ass.

Simple straight forward answer. Go to your Amphur. They will supply a replacement.

Everytime I take/took out a new policy. It's standard procedure. Google is yer friend. https://www.bolttech.co.th/en/car-insurance/tips/modified-car-coverage

Traffic accidents victims are not treated free in Thailand. Hence why the driver paid her 6,000 Baht. She had NO insurance, not even the Por Ror Bor or that would have covered her medical bill. She should not have been out on the road. I can't speak for him other than he seemed to have been aware of his responsibility.

If you have a new policy you will be required to have it photographed. If it's a continuous policy, with the same insurer, then no. But in the event of an accident the original photo's will be used to check for modifications. Insurers ain't gonna cough up if they don't have to.

Same applies to Thais when driving. Time to choose Pit Bull or Thai on a motorcycle? Which is the deadliest?

That is correct. Any modification, such as change original tyres/wheels, is a breach of the insurance. Hence why insurers always take photographs of your vehicle when you take out a policy. I think the lady has realised the she negated her policy in doing so. She has NO insurance.

When I first bought my Pit Bull, from a policeman, the woman neighbourish got off her ass and went to complain to my MiL about buying it. She was scared and didn't want it around due to phobia. My MiL wouldn't get involved. I've had this Pit Bull 7+ years. In that time it has never chased a motorbike, chased a running child, never barks at people, never bit anyone etc etc. But in that time the cow that went to my MiL's dog has done all the previous. She doesn't look after her dog and allows it to attack anyone passing without fear of punishment. But for her to go past my house it's a no no.

I didn't 'go'. I was just doing my normal annual extension. One of the documents required in the past was a TM30. I run around to oblige their request only to be told 'not needed'. What are the chances next year they'll ask for it?

Why not? Why buy a Lamborghini when a Ford Escort does basically the same job?