Jump to content

Dan O

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    2,395
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dan O

  1. Sorry if you don't like when people disagree with you. Typical trumpette response. Only thing you seem to be able to do is post your canned response as a way to avoid dealing with comments on here. No need to reply as I know what you'll say. Have a great day
  2. The only implication behind what I wrote is their are always exclusions to Every insurance policy. I never said they were hidden. Hopefully people read them (most do not) and understand them but in the end the insurance companies hold the decision making process based on a variety of factors which are not spelled out and are situation specific. So you could be in the right from your view and the insurance company can claim otherwise. Then it turns to a pissing match on collecting which usually isn't a speedy process by any means
  3. Apparently you didn't read what I wrote. I never said life in prison, you did. I said repetitive violent offenders need to held accountable. When there's a clear pattern of assault and violence that's a huge red flag but I guess you may be color blind
  4. There is something that can be done if the govt chose to. Proper driver training before missing any license. Enforcement of traffic laws. Improve the road conditions to provide proper space for the scooter riders just as a start. Stop the underage children from riding scooters and provide better transportation options to accommodate their need to travel.
  5. Actually you pretty close to the mark on this. The hush money in itself is fairly insignificant but when you couple that with the timing of his campaign and trying to hide it is the basis for many of the charges he's facing in this indictment.
  6. For a repetitive offender like him certainly shouldn't be out on the street repeating the same or worse anytime soon. If you think he should I'm sure you would have a different view had he killed a loved on of yours. Some people are habitual criminals without regard for their actions. Defending him shows a good deal about character
  7. You dont seem to follow your own advice. Just like all the trumpettes, IMO
  8. You need to post a source for your claims according the standard you reply to me
  9. Plenty of reports available to you but it appears you can't be bothered. If you can't be bothered then apply your same comments to your own posts
  10. There goes that Trump love again. Maybe a reach around is in order. Google may help jog your brain for the countless and baseless claims he's made
  11. And where exactly are you getting the info from? I'd love to see a link for that
  12. Thai justice system strikes again. How many times do we see these stories of repeat offenders killing people, burning down family homes, stealing etc. Just. Give a Wai and fruit basket and your good to go.
  13. Are you on the police force working the case?
  14. Not sure why you think it was a deposit when the article says it was in the dispenser either way it doesn't matter, the guy didnt take it and turned it in. Good on him
  15. Yes there is. Google or reading is not your strong suit http://www.thailawforum.com/database1/Treaty-of-China.html
  16. They were targeting the father for money not the student. The baffling thing is the father blow off the contact for a day or 2 not believing his daughter was kidnapped even after receiving pics showing her with the kidnappers. I would not want to live the rest of my life knowing I helped get my child killed due to my inaction
  17. Not sure what the resort owner has to do with this story but they put him right in the middle of it without cause.
  18. Not sure why your replying to me about extradition. I think my comment was pretty clear
  19. Nope, I just know how they operate. Everyone thinks they're covered for everything when in reality they have exclusions and exception to many things. Most people like yourself think your covered for everything until tragedy happens and you learn the truth.
  20. You hope it does but won't know unless you actually had a similar accident
  21. It's for a medical transport. He would need a full med staff and equip on a medical grade aircraft.
×
×
  • Create New...