Dan O

If your going to post media stories at least make factual statements and not misleading information. The lawsuit is not directed at allowing non citizens to vote but following the existing registration act. The lawsuit is because VA did not follow National Voter Registration Act . Interesting that trump followers never talk about the current legal cases in the courts now in 2 or 3 states brought by the GOP to stop overseas citizens from having the right to vote in elections. What have you got to say about that? Crickets I suspect Overseas and military voting is challenged by Republicans : NPR

You seem to be the whiner here nonstop. You need to stop trying to act important because you really aren't significant. The term is interchangeable and you know that so stop playing word salad.

You are obviously just trying to act significant by claiming your a pilot and others aren't and don't know the regs. Somehow that makes you superior, hahaha. Seems your the one that is confused by the situation. As as an aside you have no clue who holds a license and who doesn't. We don't answer to you.

OP, the airline might ask to see an onward ticket at check in and if they do show them your e-visa paper and it should be a non-issue

No need to show a FAR. The plane wasn't flying in the USA or its territorial waters or a registered airline of the US. FARs are US regs and not really applicable. I guess you missed that part of the regs when you skimmed them.

Only waste is your constant useless analysis of a situation that wasn't occurring. The tower was in communication. With the plane and knew their status. The airport the plane was circling certainly was a place to land so your claims are empty. Your showing that you are either full of it and a pilot wannabe or that you would be useless as a real pilot as you couldnt handle the normal level of stress with any ability to communicate effectively under pressure.

Again learn to read. They circled for 45 min before landing with 30 min of fuel remaining. Appears like no emergency needed to be declared as they had constant communication with ATC during their circling. ATC was well aware of their status.

Not sure who is the fool here. They had sufficient fuel, were in contact with the tower as were instructed to circle which they did and then received permission to land. You don't know the extent of the situation or the communication. All you know is the poorly written article that sensationalized the situation. Get a gripe on yourself. For someone that's supposed to be a pilot you seem to have no tolerance level to deal with a moderately stressed story. I'd hate to see you in flight.

You need to learn to read. I never said they need permission. I said they didn't need to issue an emergency yet as they were in contact with the tower and still had 30 min of fuel. Every pilot can use their discretion on issuing 1 of 2 notices for distress or emergency if its deemed necessary. Most pilots don't panic like apoarent you do. They follow training and contact instructions from traffic control You need to stop the arrogance in your posts as you may not be the only pilot on the forum

Whats your knowledge?? You know nothing of what I know. Its a fact they still had 30 minutes of fuel so no emergency needed to be declared at that point. They appraised the tower and got permission to land.

Yeah I think every one would agree, you're acting the part correctly. Your time is up on this discussion with me as you've proven your point.

Never said I don't like them. You're the one acting a fool like you're entitled. Its people like you that give thais the license to consider foreigners as low class and the sad fact is its hard to argue against it

Nope, just acknowledges their limitations

Yeah right. As I said you fit right in. Your family must be really proud of you with reaching that low bar in life.

You convenient forget about the roadside stand with people you can mow down or the pedestrian that you drive over. Fits right in with a lack of critical and spatial thinking that the thais seem to lack. Seems you've joined their club

Yeah I know, its all a joke until you hit someone or kill them. In the meantime you bitch and moan about how bad thai drivers are. I guess this makes you on par with them right ? Its nice to fit in isn't it?

Because there was no emergency to announce, they still have 30 minutes of fuel remaining.

Emigrating has little to do with it. They don't have to leave the country to find themselves in a gang. Just look at the unneccesary violence between the technical schools here. Little is done here to discourage it other than lip service.

Pretty much most women are liars if you judge by your comment. They wear make-up, color their hair and present a more appealing image than in real life. Kinda like waking up next to that "beauty" from the bar after a long night drinking.

By your own comments its obvious that the level of your drinking you indicated would score you as drunk on most all breathalyzer tests and thats a clear indication you're drunk even if you cant admit it. There's no realitive question to it, there are limits in jurisdictions that test. Its called the law

Thats a ridiculous excuse for drunk driving. You really can't justify it no matter how hard you try.

Having an unexpected situation happen with a delayed reaction occuring after drinking has a much higher chance of a bad outcome. Your kidding yourself if you claim it doesnt. If drunk driving is managing risk factors that's a new one. Your far more honest saying "I'll take a chance".

I know well about phuket and your just trying to make excuses. If your out clubbing or dining they are generally transportation options and now with grab and the like even more. Try the bs excuses out on a newbie

In phuket? Are you kidding yourself. Try that excuse out on someone else

Its not just about what your doing its about how you react in totality. Other drivers that are careless, (and there are plenty to go around) can do something unexpected.