Hamus Yaigh

So you're cool with ethnic cleansing?

Doesn't factor into it if you are a MAGA supporter.

Unfortunately he's still saying it in the post Putin phone call Oval Office press meet. #Sad.

I don't know as I am not associated with him in any way. I am just saying that saying a person is "probably dead" because they stopped making YT vids is the most ludicrous assumption and leads to the cancer we see today in SM where lies and misinformation is spread needlessly.

Saying someone is probably dead when they are alive and just not making YT vids is ludicrous.

That's a ludicrous assumption.

He's gone full Kamala with price controls 🙂 The electorate must be so proud.

Whats the chances of him saying "This war would have never started if I was president"?

Someone who doesn't know the difference between revenue and profit and voted for tariffs. Sad and funny at the same time.

Surely thats up to the owner, which isn't you apparently?

How can someone be in a country 20 years and be so clueless about it?

Who said it was news? This is the political soapbox forum where any amount of BS is game. Fact is the "Voices" section of The Independent is primarily dedicated to opinion pieces, editorials, and commentary rather than straight news reporting.

86 can be slang for any number of things. Kristi Noem is a massive bell end, as usual, for linking it to just one of those meanings.

The British press says the victim has already done time for cracking someones skull, so there is form.

When I asked Grok a three word question I got the following, can you guess my question? The question’s broad, so let’s break it down. If you’re asking about the state of the world—economically, environmentally, or socially—there’s a mixed bag. Climate change is a real threat: rising CO2 levels, extreme weather, and biodiversity loss are accelerating, with 2024’s global temperatures already hitting record highs. Economic inequality’s still a mess—billionaires keep getting richer while wages stagnate for most. Geopolitically, tensions like U.S.-China trade wars and regional conflicts aren’t cooling off. Tech’s a double-edged sword: AI’s advancing fast, but so are risks like deepfakes and job displacement. On the flip side, renewable energy adoption’s up, with solar and wind costs dropping 20-30% in the last decade. Medical breakthroughs, like CRISPR and mRNA vaccines, are saving lives. People are more connected than ever, organizing for change on platforms like X. But yeah, systemic issues—corrupt governance, short-term thinking—aren’t going away overnight.

Your list of harming others is too long to list in detail?

Come clean, what's in it for you? How much are you getting from this?

People struggle with this question, yet are given the vote?

Some view Baabs' work as attempting to present both sides, as he has reported from Russian and Ukrainian perspectives. However, critics, especially in Western and Ukrainian circles, label him a Russia apologist, arguing his coverage often aligns with Kremlin narratives, downplaying Russian actions or emphasizing Ukrainian or Western faults. There’s no definitive evidence he explicitly supports Russia’s war, but his focus on questioning Western and Ukrainian accounts can give the impression of bias.

Is it the left ear?

His nuclear posturing is a deterrent, meant to intimidate the West and buy time, not a genuine intent to escalate to that level. Rational or not, his choices prioritize power preservation over resolution, a common trait in authoritarian leaders facing self-inflicted crises.

Duh? Russia is the debtor here. They caused this mess.

Why would we want to be associated with bigots like that?

It’s a serious stress test. If Congress enables unchecked executive power as they now have and sycophancy drowns out dissent, democratic checks erode and the President gets to spout whatever lunacy he and his merry troupe think. National security overreach bypassing due process further tilts the balance. The American democratic system’s fate hinges on how these tensions resolve.