Hamus Yaigh

Perhaps in your extremist right wing way of thinking it is dodgy, but to more balanced people the court was just clamping down, as it should rightly do so, on Robinson's use of racist bating rhetoric and lies about a Syrian school kid abuse victim for his own selfish political agenda and repeating the lies after already being found guilty of such. Unlike in the J D Vance world, they don't tolerate illegal use of free speech of others like that lightly.

The logical thought processes of a Brexiteer live in action.

Which begs the question what kind of the human specimen makes such a comment in this context?

Based on what? Your rhetoric and the op has no specifics. One might expect specifics if there's going to be a debate about it?

They tried that in the 1930s. They know how it works out.

Lack of ID and no due course, some could even be US citizens. Brings to mind innocent victims of the Japanese internment during WW2. Way to go, 'merica, you are turning into a racist shtshow and laughing stock of the globe.

How do you know they weren't innocent bystanders with tattoos? #rhetorical

What bothers me is why you are even here. This forum is called Asean Now not America Now?

Trump didn't lose the plot. He's always been what he has been. Voters lost the plot last year by allowing this to happen at all.

They're called Russians. A lot of them in Thailand.

Did you actually think this out for yourself, or just copied some dodgy AI troller app output and not even read it? None of your points seem like an advert to like Russia, the opposite in fact. And BTW, its not lefties screaming, its anyone with an ounce of common sense and decency.

You can do 90 reports wherever you are registered with a TM30 as living. You can change this location as often as you like.

Straight out the JV Vance school boys guide to free speech. Vance is arguing its better to have a countries elections be interfered with from Russia as a free speech right where speech can include lies and indoctrination, rather than uphold election law. With allies like this who needs enemies.

Idiots discussing British-ness based on skin color, This thread has turned into a racists support group.

If ever a more self obsessed sob there was, its on full show in this astonishing piece of bs.

You can get much cheaper rates (up to 10x) than those using an app like Mytello which to take your examples charge 0.34THB/m to either Germany, UK or USA.

+1 Makes no sense why anyone would go.

Jog on sunshine. “We don’t want to be Americans. No, we don’t want to be Danes. We want to be Greenlanders, and we want our own independence in the future,” Nielsen, 33, told Britain’s Sky News. “And we want to build our own country by ourselves.”

Jog on sunshine. “We don’t want to be Americans. No, we don’t want to be Danes. We want to be Greenlanders, and we want our own independence in the future,” Nielsen, 33, told Britain’s Sky News. “And we want to build our own country by ourselves.”

That's your job. The rest of us will stick with objective facts, thanks.

Who's trolling who here?

Perhaps you'd prefer Fox News. https://www.livenowfox.com/news/pentagon-dei-image-removal basically concurring what AP is saying: Like the o/p says about being dumb and dumber, it's astonishing that the Pentagon's algorithm or reviewers failed to grasp the historical context and significance of the Enola Gay name, leading to its inclusion in the purge. The situation does bear some resemblance to the classic dystopian novel "1984" by George Orwell. In the book, the totalitarian government exercises total control over information, history, and language, suppressing any narratives that contradict their ideology.

Never had you down as a Grauniad reader, there's hope for you yet.

Another interesting thread ruined by American idiots or Russian imposters I see. AN has lost it. I wonder what George thinks of his creation and how it turned out, he must be so proud.

What is so very predictable is people like you posting dishonest bs biased in one political direction only? Why not tell the WHOLE news instead of one biased source? Here's some clues for the uneducated: Western media outlets like The New York Times, BBC, or CNN might report more favorably on Ukraine, emphasizing the need for international support and condemning Russian aggression. In contrast The NY Post is owned by News Corp, a media conglomerate with a conservative leaning. The NY Post's editorial board has historically taken a more right-wing stance and this has turned to more extremist right during the current right wing US administration. e.g. Internet news search (only ONE result comes close to yours and NYP opinionated bs): 1. Ukraine summit in Brussels ends with no consensus after .(NY Post) 2. EU leaders back new military spending plans at Ukraine summit (AP) 3. EU leaders vow to re-arm Europe amid US retreat on Ukraine (France 24) 4. European leaders agree on defense spending surge (CNN) Hope this helps.