placeholder

You don't seem to understand that this election isn't all about you. Swift has a huge following among women. For what it's worth, I think this kind of fandom is bizarre. But it's a fact. And if she can get more of those women to vote, that's bad news for Trump. "While 45 per cent of Swift's US fans are millennials — like the 34-year-old herself — 21 per cent are Gen X and 25 per cent are Boomers, according to a 2023 survey. That means nearly half of her millions of fans are likely over 45" https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-02-18/why-are-so-many-taylor-swift-fans-middle-aged/103457252

You clearly haven't a clue about the First Amendment. Denouncing the opinions of other people, and asking others to denounce those opinions is also protected by the first Amendment. J.D. Vance is free to spout nonsense and be interviewed by whomever he pleases. And others are free to denounce him for his opinions and for those with whom he chooses to associate.

Usual self centered nonsense about America. Not every major world events happen because of what takes place in the USA

It was just awful the way she got angry over stuff like crowd size and repeatedly blasted off into tirades...she is...oh wait a minute..

If only ABC had understood that this debate was supposed to be only about issues that mattered to you.

And yet even with a machine gun he managed to miss his targets.

As Donald Rumsfeld once said "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence." That approach worked out well, didn't it.?

Spreading falsehoods much? Fact Check: No evidence Swift, Kelce said they will leave US if Trump wins election https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/no-evidence-swift-kelce-said-they-will-leave-us-if-trump-wins-election-2024-02-20/ Not surprising you're a Trump supporter. After all, you believe that if a woman is promiscuous that is a mark against her. Whereas if a man is promiscuous, and let's say this man cheats on his wife with another woman while said wife is pregnant, that says nothing against him.

Apparently, to your way of thinking, knowledge can't cross international borders. Perhaps this is why so many of Trump's supporters reject Darwin's Theory of Evolution. It just can't make it across the border.

False. Cooper claimed that it was Churchill's fault that the war expanded beyond Poland. Churchill wasn't even PM until after Hitler invaded the Benelux countries.

No, saying that Churchill and Britain did as much as possible is not the same thing as saying that they dragged the United States into War. That would mean that they pulled an unwilling American into the War. Do you believe that the UK had that kind of clout?

Actually, the immigration issue was raised. Harris closed with a reference to how the turnout for Trump at his events was lagging. The weird old loon took the bait and went after Harris on that score.

And anyone repeatedly encountering your opinions would know that they mostly lie on the far right.

The British dragged American into the war? You mean that America didn't see Hitler as a threat? Franklin Roosevelt and others were tricked into supporting the UK?

We would have to go on past form.

Nor did Roberts. Read this again: Cooper's first argument was that Churchill "was primarily responsible for that war becoming what it did, something other than an invasion of Poland." Yet in the moment that Adolf Hitler invaded Belgium, Holland, and Luxembourg at dawn on May 10, 1940, Winston Churchill was not even prime minister. Unless Mr. Cooper is arguing that from his position as First Lord of the Admiralty—the head of Britain's navy—Churchill was somehow able to force Hitler to unleash Blitzkrieg in the West, his first argument falls to the ground.

Sure. A megalomaniac like Hitler wouldn't have eventually turned against Britain.

Apart from the ridiculousness of crediting Hitler's offer as sincere, you are ignoring that fact that Cooper also blamed Churchill for the war expanding beyond Poland.

Because Hitler was an honorable man? And if you don't believe me, just hold a seance with Neville Chamberlain. Munich anyone? This belief in Hitler as someone who could be counted on to keep his word is just plain nuts.

First off, I see you have no answer for Cooper accusing Churchill of turning Hitler down. And Churchill failed to persuade America to fight against Germany. Credit for that coup belongs to another party. Maybe you've heard of him? A certain A. Hitler? On 11 December 1941, four days after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and the United States declaration of war against Imperial Japan, Nazi Germany declared war against the United States, in response to what was claimed to be a "series of provocations" by the United States government when the U.S. was still officially neutral during World War II. The decision to declare war was made by Adolf Hitler, following two days of consultation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_declaration_of_war_against_the_United_States

So, you're claiming, contrary to Roberts, that it's a fact that Winston Churchill was PM when Hitler was making his proposals?

For some IMO works as a get-out-of-jail-free card. It obviates the need for any evidence-based rebuttals.

I repeatedly say "partially implemented" and you reply as though I had written "fully implemented.". Stop making things up. Wow1 4 Nazis who worked on the plan at Nuremberg claimed that the plan was never implemented. Definitely believable. What motive could they possibly have to deny it. But wait, it gets even better... "In 1947/48, Mäding euphemistically stated that the General Plan East had "significantly improved the value of the areas in question and thus a significant improvement in the standard of living of the inhabitants, including the remaining Polish population."[2]" https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erhard_Mäding The above is an English translation of what Mäding claimed. But wait it gets even better: In 1947/48, Mäding euphemistically stated that the General Plan East had "meant a significant upgrading of the areas in question and thus a significant improvement in the standard of living of the inhabitants, including the remaining Polish population."[2] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erhard_Mäding I didn't bother to check the resumes of the other 3 who testified. Should I?

Good thing they'll have an opportunity for the guy who claimed to save Obamacare.

One comment that hasn't aged well.