Liverpool Lou

You should read the full OP.

Not quite the case, countries add and change taxes regularly. It was exactly the case with the last attempt to do this. It was reported that the airline industry refused to collect that proposed tax. From the OP... "The problem outlined by a spokesman for the Ministry of Tourism on Wednesday is that the Ministry is still finalising the collection method for the fee which the last government proposed should be by incoming airlines flying into the country. This was reportedly met with behind-the-scenes pushback from the airline industry and is also thought to have damaged relations and confidence between the government by powerful large carriers who make decisions which impact Thailand’s international flight connectivity".

Yes, it was helpful in relation to what you asked. The problem isn't the SIM, as I helpfully, explained so it must be the phone or whatever entity is feeding that alert to the phone, as I also helpfully explained.

The non-readers are out in force/farce again!

Perhaps you "should of" read the link.

SIZE MATTERS ???? In this case size was irrelevant.

Why?

There's a link...she didn't.

The cash was refused.

The cash was refused. I guess you didn't read it all.

Garbage...complete myth dragged out now and again as being factual.

Because they cannot...the airline industry pushed back and told them to bugger off and collect it themselves when it was last proposed.

In the case of the Siam Paragon shooting that is not what happened. There is no fund providing money coming from foreign tourists in existence at the moment. You'd know that if you read the whole report.

Which tourists have had to pay the compensation for the Siam Paragon deaths? There is no "tourist fee scheme" in operation at the moment.

Another? In addition to which other tourist fee?

Sarcasm, of course, yes? Did you actually read your own (hardly independent) link? Eg... "We come back today with an article of one of our natural hair products which has already seduced many users but which has also sucks many question..."

I reciprocate your sentiment regarding your obvious astuteness.

You just did, you called it "stupid"...duh

You're wrong. You may think so, I did not say say it was fact. I said that I believe that, because of its status, Wise does not make any declaration to the Revenue Dept. I believe that I am correct.

It's your choice to make that mistake because of one exceptional incident. Can't imagine why, then, you're asking for advice about using taxis when you, clearly, have all the skills necessary to ensure that you always pay the correct fare. Why did you ask about the cost to go from Bangsue to Mo Chit when no one here knows what you are going to negotiate with the driver who may be ripping you off?

"...in a media we don't mention..." The Bangkok Post reported that a couple of days ago, also. It's got to be your phone (or your government), not the SIM, it's not an automatic download from Dtac. I have a Dtac SIM so I get the Dtac app but do not have the app you mention. It cannot be courtesy of Dtac, if it was, everyone on Dtac would have it also.

Around B70-100. On the meter! Just open the back door and tell the driver where you're going, don't ask him "How much?", the meter will tell you that when to get to Mo Chit.

I am not used to using taxis, the only taxis I have used I have just jumped in after asking the fare of course "...after asking the fare of course". Of course? That is not how to use taxis in Bangkok, the taxis you need to use have meters.

Write a full report in Thai about the incident and request the amount that you would like from the BMA. Don't forget to include your bank details in order to receive the funds. When your request is ignored, as it will be, sue them. Or, save yourself a lot of money and just forget it.

Absolutely no point in googling "bars for rent in Patong", then?