Why? What difference would that have made?
What difference? If it was imported it would have made it more expensive than some people think a domestic product should be...that difference
If their policy change negatively affects joint accounts, and they don’t care, then what are we to think?
"...what are we to think?"
How about thinking that the bank's explanation that it is related to security is actually a good thing? To assume that they do not want joint accounts does not make any sense, why would the bank frown on joint accounts?
So you can have a joint account but can't both access it from different phones via their app.
So they don't want joint accounts.
Anyway, that was my logic.
That's right. You read it how you want to but, logically, though, it does not mean that BBL does not want joint accounts.
Silly post.
I prefer a normal jury that takes the jury instructions seriously and reaches a verdict based on the evidence provided.
It was less silly than yours! You'd prefer a jury with no (to use your inappropriately denigrating tone) "Maga" contingent?
You have a fully operational retail, current account in your name with BBL London and all the usual banking facilities, which is what the OP is asking about? Or do you mean that when you transfer from HSBC they use BBL London for the transfer?
Changing a battery does not require a "skilled watch smith", even for a decent watch. If it's a waterproof watch that you need re-sealing after opening, that's a different question.