Liverpool Lou

Are you also unaware that reading the Op properly is usually a good idea then you wouldn't have to think that it was reported that "a knife is used to cut water"?

I don't know who you're addressing that to but I sure did read it correctly. Could it be that you didn't compose the OP correctly and that you expected others to be able to guess what you actually meant to post? Since your OP you added on that (a) Lazada cancelled your order and (b) now mentioned that it was a 3rd party order. Anything else you should have disclosed originally?

The inverted commas around "purchased" indicate that it wasn't purchased in the usual meaning of the word. Could you clarify what actually specifically happened with this order that you are claiming Lazada scammed you on? Based on the confusion, my bet is that Lazada did not scam you, at all.

"Lazada cancelled the order..." Perhaps you should have mentioned that in the OP in the first place to save confusion.

So it seems, he didn't make it exactly crystal clear, though, in my defence!

So you did not get the usual order confirmation from Lazada as soon as you submitted the order?

There's something not right about this OP. Based on my experience of a number of refund requests (all successful), problems with purchases on Lazada and requests to return for a refund are always dealt with without any issue. What reason would there be for Lazada to act the way the OP claims if his refund request is legitimate or he's not providing the full story? It does not make any sense.

The link from which Webfact got the article also refers to her age four times.

Where you there? Were you?

YES ! You aren't a structural engineer. In fact, quite often when a Forum member here makes a completely sensible post, Diamond Member LIVERPOOL LOU is the first one to his keyboard to ridicule the post... usually a snide 'one sentence' comment without any basis. And you are a structural engineer?! Is the OP?! You're not trying to suggest that the OP had any basis in fact to write that Sukhumvit is "literally falling down", are you? If you are perhaps you'd quote it, or provide your own evidence of "falling down Sukhumvit".

It's not "hilariously over-valued" if it sells!

There's not much in Bangkok that doesn't find buyers and none in the Sukhumvit area of this thread.

A bloke he met in a Patpong bar!

A wonderful post full of anecdotal stories. Got anything factual?

Its not low suk! That's not the only thing that's inaccurate in his OP!

My money's on none just falling over.

Such as?

The same properties are found all along Sukhumvit Road Really? That one isn't falling down so which ones are "falling down all along Sukhumvit Road"?

...and it is not falling down!

Where is this mysterious "useless" land? Where has anyone (you don't count. for obvious reasons) stated that "land around Sukhumvit can't be built on because it's sinking and the structures are toppling over making the land useless"? There's a lot of building going on all over Sukhumvit Road right now. Which buildings have toppled over?

No, there are no reports or indications that that building is "literally starting to fall down". One layman with a couple of amateur photos of a building that is, literally, not falling down, does not equate to a collapsing Sukhumvit.

What do you base that on, then? You've had them all surveyed?

"Sukhumvit is falling down, literally". Er, no, literally, it isn't. Neither that building, nor "Sukhumvit", which is a road, roads don't fall down.

Why should you be concerned about why I'm "confused"? "Boring" But, yes, I do agree with that self-analysis of your own comment.

Yes, it says that he has plenty of free time when he's finished his shift. What's so 'kin "priceless" about that?