Liverpool Lou

Correct, because of his age it will be served at home. Nonsense, he was transported straight to Klong Prem.

Won't he? Where will he be, then, what IS the alternative prison accommodation that you have information about?

He's in Klong Prem and he will, like all the others, be in a "dorm" cell containing around thirty inmates, and none of the accommodation has a hole in the ground facility. There is no "Special", "VIP" or "Executive" paid-for accommodation there, if there was he wouldn't have needed to perform his stupid PGH stunt.

tell us your bs tail of knowledge I would if you hadn't posted that "BS" comment/request. I, on the other hand, never post BS, if you can find some, quote it here.

Inmates in Klong Prem do not have to wear prison clothing except when they have to be outside the prison. Basic clothing (civilian) is available for purchase (and wear) at the prison shop. Ask me how I know.

If he was bailed he wouldn't have been taken to the prison!

They do not wear prison uniform, inmates wear their own clothes except when they have to appear in court.

He's there already and the Thai prison system does not have "private luxury cells...despite the asinine Asean Now posters' urban myth.

The same way that all the other prisoners are locked in.

He was convicted and had a record before the SC's ruling.

He is there already.

No, it will not, if that was going to happen he would not have been taken to prison.

No.

Readily available in sex shops in Oz. Nothing illegal about that I didn't say that it (lube) was illegal, I was saying that, as in almost all other countries, the lube is subject to local regs/standards. Some poster was suggesting that it was just "crazy Thailand" that had those regulations.

Real criminals are being arrested also, there's more than seven officers in the RTP.

It is not just Thailand, it's the same in the UK, US, Australia and Europe to name just a few.

No, it's the US police tyrants that usually claim that.

Oh don't be racist it's not needed Nothing racist in my comment. Why the fatuous accusation?

Firstly, people from South Korea are Koreans. Secondly, no one was reported to have "kicked the <deleted> out of anyone".

Read what I quoted, im only responding to what the article states. You are just making your own assumptions not even going off the article Read what the OP actually states... "Lee admitted to striking the Briton, telling officers: “I didn’t like the way he looked at me, so I punched him once". I'm going off what was actually reported, you're the one making assumptions!

He didn't get involved, as the Korean confirmed.

...and you haven't learnt to read the OP. Apart from being there he did not involve himself in any way.

Read the OP.

The OP clearly stated that he is the same person.

As everyone who actually read the OP would know, he did not involve himself, at all, as the Korean <deleted> confirmed.