Liverpool Lou
-
Posts
26,721 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by Liverpool Lou
-
Well there was Lord Effingham .....who fronted for the Krays. Ronnie always told the good Lord ...Effie make the effing tea '. Bugger-all to do with the OP.
-
Consulates exist to serve themselves B0llocks.
-
<deleted>, Lou It's called " Finders Keepers " Where I Come from in Liverpool 555 ! 555 ! aka theft, regardless of what you call it.
-
No, it's not, not in the slightest.
-
The OP reported that he claims his documentation is in order. An extension of stay does not infer anything, it does imply that he should have had funds at some stage, though. It doesn't imply that those funds last forever, particularly if he has ongoing expenses
-
What could they do for someone who doesn't want assistance?
-
Because he doesn't want help, apparently? Consular officials aren't there to force themselves on people.
-
For those who read the OP, none.
-
Is it?
-
The embassy is not a charity, what can it be expected do without setting a dangerous precedent? The OP reports that his documentation is in order so how could he be deported?
-
Like no comparable building in Thailand has ever done, you mean?
-
Why? What evidence do you have that suggests that the foundations of tall construction projects are lacking?
-
No, there was no general rule such as that limiting all constructions.
-
Without evidence, what would be "reasonable" about that bizarre assumption?
-
In the context of the OP, what action has the House of Lords taken that may, or may not be seen as "Lordly" or justify a dig at a specific Lord's lifestyle?
-
Thanks for confirming the accuracy of my comment. From your own comment... Robbery is the crime of stealing from somewhere or someone, such as a bank or a person.
-
B0llocks.
-
So what if he wasn't there for dharma, how is his personal life any of your concern? There's something wrong with consensual buggery?...perhaps he was there for the "express purpose" of fellatio?
-
Why? And why "obviously"?
-
No one? So who are all those already serving in his administration?
-
Taking the paragraphs in isolation is what changed the context. My quoting the paragraph that I wanted to comment on did not alter the context of that paragraph but why are you so concerned for him?
-
Yes.
-
Yes, it would called theft.
-
You have truncated the post, changed the context and answered a question that wasn't asked. The poster was referring to the android emulator so was referring to the use of the android app on 2 different devices. I was commenting on the second paragraph of his post that I quoted in full and of which I did not alter the context.
-
They do, I use their online banking on a laptop and the phone app for the same account. The phone app doesn't facilitate the use of two phones/numbers for the same account.
