Well there was Lord Effingham .....who fronted for the Krays. Ronnie always told the good Lord ...Effie make the effing tea '.
Bugger-all to do with the OP.
The OP reported that he claims his documentation is in order. An extension of stay does not infer anything, it does imply that he should have had funds at some stage, though. It doesn't imply that those funds last forever, particularly if he has ongoing expenses
The embassy is not a charity, what can it be expected do without setting a dangerous precedent?
The OP reports that his documentation is in order so how could he be deported?
In the context of the OP, what action has the House of Lords taken that may, or may not be seen as "Lordly" or justify a dig at a specific Lord's lifestyle?
Thanks for confirming the accuracy of my comment. From your own comment...
Robbery is the crime of stealing from somewhere or someone, such as a bank or a person.
So what if he wasn't there for dharma, how is his personal life any of your concern? There's something wrong with consensual buggery?...perhaps he was there for the "express purpose" of fellatio?
Taking the paragraphs in isolation is what changed the context.
My quoting the paragraph that I wanted to comment on did not alter the context of that paragraph but why are you so concerned for him?
You have truncated the post, changed the context and answered a question that wasn't asked.
The poster was referring to the android emulator so was referring to the use of the android app on 2 different devices.
I was commenting on the second paragraph of his post that I quoted in full and of which I did not alter the context.
They do, I use their online banking on a laptop and the phone app for the same account.
The phone app doesn't facilitate the use of two phones/numbers for the same account.