Liverpool Lou

You argued that the Romans were justified in killing people. Try reading what I actually posted and also what you have posted. I did not post that Romans were justified in killing people whereas you did post that homosexuality, because it happened in the Dark Ages 3000 years ago, should be considered as natural!

Well, you said it, it is unfortunate that we have our opinions.

The Romans were murderers. Interesting you are pro murder and anti sex. Strange morals you have. Very odd that your conclusion from my posting facts, not an opinion, leads you assume what my morals are and to ridiculously claim, with no justification, that I am "pro murder" and "anti-sex". Strange intellect you have.

If it happened a lot 3000 years ago then it makes it natural and a part of human development. Read about it in more detail; homosexual relationships between people of similar ages at that time were considered abnormal and perverted. The Romans habitually condemned people to death by lions and other wild animals, does that mean that to do so is also natural and part of human development and is something to be celebrated?

I am a buyer not a seller like you. "I am a buyer..." Lame, but interesting to know that you want to buy "full service" from him.

I don't think so. Care to try to back that up? That's an unfortunate choice of phraseology. No, I wouldn't, I don't think the homo aspect of a man wanting another man's penis needs any "backing up".

I'll go so far as to claim that every man and woman has elements of both hetero and homo sexual present. It is only down to society norms that prevent most from at a minimum experimenting with the "other". Apparently homosexuality was normal in Ancient Greece. Why would you claim that? Your assertion is daft in the extreme. very inaccurate and reads as though you're trying to find justification for something. We exist in 2024, not the Greek Dark Ages of 1,000 years BC.

In your opinion. Obviously...but factually, by definition, also.

Another one inflicted with being terminally literal. Terminally accurate, to be precise.

no because unlike dear leader daddy is not a serial liar What?

He said that he won't, but then, he is a liar.

Which goons were charged with insurrection?

...and a man wanting a penis is a homosexual.

The Supreme Court didn't exactly say that. The court said it did not recognise Thammanat's conviction because the verdict was delivered in Australia, a foreign country. "The verdict of any state only has effect in that state," the court said. That offender was not indicted, nor convicted, in Thailand, Shinawatra has been indicted here, and his case will be heard in Thailand, there's a big difference. The Thai court's verdict is what will count.

Yeah, right. But I suppose THB is much more convenient than dollars.

Cheese...such a signature romantic thing.

No, those three are too busy on this forum to get involved in that sort of caper.

What have you got to offer him?

And how did they know who he was ? Maybe the Russian, who apparently wants to return to Thailand and has to take responsibility, asked the lawyer to got to the police on his behalf.

He's not here so cannot be deported.

Err Just how did they contact him ? Did the cop have him on speed dial ? Via his lawyer.

No, you got it wrong. Try reading the OP, it is very clearly explained.

He certainly wasn't appearing in court, he was representing the Russian, in his absence, to acknowledge the charges at the police station.

You're happy that you've made no false guesses. I'm "happy" that you cannot back up your claims with any specifics about "the rich who consistently pay little or no tax".

In addition to my previous reply - and before you ask, you can either check this out yourself of regard me as a liar - I don't really care which. I work, I have more to do with my time than pamper to your wishes: "...check this out yourself of regard me as a liar..." I'll go with the latter option that you offered as you cannot justify your claim. If you had any actual evidence you'd have presented it as doing so would take far less time than your farcical back and forth that you now claim that you have no time for. But that suits me.