TroubleandGrumpy

Mate - I dont know where you got that from - but I can assure you in the West the vast majority of divorce cases are not 'fair' - the man inevitably loses when there is a legal fight - that is why in USA Prenup Agreements are a must. However, in places like Australia, NZ, UK and much of Europe, a prenup is not binding when it comes to a Court case. Likewise, access by Fathers who want to see and raise their children is rarely 50/50 - and there is often SFA enforcement done on the Mothers - but if a Father misses a payment he is in deep poo poo. Perhaps in USA it is different - particularly in some States. In Thailand what a western Expat brings into a marriage stays his property in a divorce, as you said. But that is not the case in most western countries - a second marriage gives the women (after about 2-3 years) the rights to some of the property both parties own - nothing is excluded during settlement (maybe different in some States of USA). In Australia and NZ (not aware of same elsewhere) if you live with a woman for 12+ months, you are technically married - Yep - and they have rights to some of your property and wealth if there is a break up. I have seen it happen many times - they will stay with a bloke for 2-3 years and then sue for divorce and demand settlement money. Actually happened to my Ex's Father and he drank himself to death after losing his house (had to sell it to pay her off) - that was why my Ex was 'reasonable' when we got divorced.

Great point - my last 10 years have been the happiest of my life - since my 'glory days' when a young boy/man.

FIXED - US Prosecutors Suspended for Telling The Truth Using Lawfare to Attack Political Opponent

And we can get it easily - as long as we have money. Want women need (versus what they want) is not for sale or rent - a trusted companion and a partner in life to protect and support them. So many women that fall for the feminist trap, and then severely regret it many years later when it all goes to sheite and their 'friends' all disappear. Often in the end it is just them and their cats - who eat them when they die. Women need men a lot more than men want women (for sex).

Millennial Soy Boy ??

The Thai girls (outside Bangkok) will not listen mate - they do not believe that being fat and ugly is 'empowering' and they do not believe that they are 'equal' and they dont need 'validation' from other women. Thai girls want to be feminine and dress like a girl - and nothing any fat ugly feminist western woman says is going to change that. Plus the marriage laws in Thailand are not at all like in the west - here the women do not get treated like the sun shines out their back and front ends and they deserve everything - and the men do not get treated like they are all violent misogynist rapists who deserve nothing.

I have not laughed so much when listening to that 4 foot nutter cry about being arrested - 🤣

In pictures for the hard of thinking to understand why what you said is 100% accurate, and is why Vietnam is growing 8-9% since Covid and Thailand is slowly dying. Clearly the wealthy Thais with $billions overseas keep the Baht high. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Same for the BS numbers that claim Malaysia was the largest source of visitors with 3.8 million - border walkers who visit every week or two make up a large amount of that number. But then again - it does say 'visitors' not tourists. How to lie TAT style - provide visitor numbers and then talk about tourists - and claim every visitor is a tourist and that they all spend 50K each visit. Hey Mr Anutin are you listening?? TAT have been lying for many years !! You should make them only count visitors as tourists - when they arrive in Thailand at one of the international airports - and when they state on their online Arrival Card that they are on a holiday. By the way Mr Anutin - exactly how many have arrived using the online arrival card system stating that they are on holiday?? What did you say - they dont count them?! Well how the f**** does TAT know how many tourists? What did you say - they count all arrivals as tourists to make the economy look better ?!! OK - now I understand - that is why 3.8 million Malaysians have 'visited' Thailand as a tourist. That also explains why when we were in Bangkok 3 times this year for over a week each time, that we saw lots of Indians and Chinese, but we saw SFA Malaysians. By the way Mr Anutin - did you know that the Bangkok Jewellery Trade Centre (largest in this part of SEAsia) is absolutely full of Indians - buying and selling jewels - probably 95% of the 3 floors of sellers are Indian - took us a long time to find a Thai seller. Did you also know that there are Indians all over Bangkok selling khrapp in the Malls and shopping centres? Just saying Sir - in case you did not know.

If there is anyone with a history of "perverted trolling jollies" it is you mate. Plus not too far behind some recent additions - BLMFem, Harrisfan, MalcolmB, Gamma etc etc etc. Read the Avatar mate - and get over it - only just over 3 more years to go - and then 8 for Vance.

What is the definition of 'mis-information'? And who makes that decision?? Throughout history the 'experts' have been proven wrong. Plus throughout history - fascists socialists and communists have used force to shut down dissent and argument, in order to enforce their dictated rules/beliefs.

May I suggest you contact the experts in UK. The UK government does not pay for repatriation services for individuals, but the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) can provide advice and assistance through local British embassies or consulates abroad. Repatriation costs must typically be covered by private funds, often through travel insurance or by the family. (Google AI) Medical repatriation companies in the UK - GOV.UK https://www.gov.uk/guidance/medical-repatriation-companies-in-the-uk

ROFLOL - Trump triggering the liberals - The Master does it again.

Then why would getting a 3 month Visa be a problem? It is not about people that do that - it is about the blow-ins causing social and criminal problems. The 'Security' Agencies have officially told/informed the Tourism' Agencies that they are causing too many problems to the country by these 'open border' Visas/Entries. Next they will meet a few more times and discuss further - and then agree to form a Committee - and they will meet a few times and discuss - then a draft recommendation will be made to Cabinet - who will think about it and it they agree in principle they will form another Committee to discuss it further - then they will send a set of final recommendations made back to Cabinet - who will then eventually discuss the matter in Cabinet meetings for a while - then they will/might make a decision - Yes/No or Discuss more. If Yes, then the Cabinet decision will be referred to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs who will form a Working Group - then the working group will meet a few times to work out what Regulations and Rules need to be changed - then they will direct the Department bureaucracy to draft those rule and regulation changes - they will form an Implementation Committee who will meet many times to discuss and agree the exact wording required to make the changes that are needed - then they will create a Change Proposal which will be sent back to the Implementation Committee - they will have a meeting or two to accept the proposed changes - then they will send that document back to the Working Group - they will have a meeting or two and then send the documentation to Cabinet - who will take a few meetings to discuss and if the decision if Yes they will send it to the Privy Office for Royal Assent. Please not at any time during all that - one or more 'groups' might decide to make changes and send it all back through the 'system' again. I reckon in about 2-3 years the needed changes will be made. By the way - that same process is currently being undertaken about changing the Thailand Tax rules and regulations to implement a global taxation system as opposed to the current remittance only system, and that will probably take about the same length of time too - and could at any time also be dropped.

Last ever reply to you mate - I do this for others to read the answer. The attachment from SP Offices proved that some other Offices (not just KK) also demand 3 months in a bank account. Stay confused away from me - blocked (and in other forum) - go troll others.

Tip of the iceberg

Plus I will also point out that all Immigration Offices require a bank statement/letter - and that Bangkok Bank has decided 4 months before letter/certificate or the amount is locked in for 4 months afterwards. Because it is a requirement to comply with Immigration rules for extensions, whatever any bank imposes upon proving their letter/certificate is also a requirement for obtaining an Extension. Expats with upcoming Extension dates should check with both the local Immigration Office for what their current rules are, and also with their bank too.

Yes indeed there are rules and then there are whatever the local Office decides. Which is why I went into the Office a few weeks before to ask for exactly what there Retirement Extension process is. I know @Liquorice thinks if he took a copy of the Official Head Office regulations and pointed out where they are wrong, that they would immediately change their processes and admit they made several mistakes - but we all know that in reality that would never happen and Liqy's application would be rejected and he would be thrown out on his butt.

I certainly do not believe you. Plus I shortened the term - Extension of Stay for 12 months under original Non-Immigration O-Visa. As everyone knows. Stop being obtuse and argumentative - there is no right and wrong - there is only what each Province Office decides. Oh wait let me say that again - There is only what each Provincial Office of the Immigration Police decides.

Listen closely - the Retirement Extension instructions are in-between parts of others - please read again. Whatever KK Immigration decides IS the extension process - the stamps in my Passport prove that.

What do you mean 'some' - they are all lowlifes and if they all resigned the USA would be a much better place - after the GOP cleaned up all their mess. Same for left wing woke Governments all over the world - they are lowlifes and they appeal to the lowlifes and fools. And when that is not enough, they import more voters (legally and illegally).

Yeh - I think he is saying that the official rules are correct. But the reality in Thailand is that the locals decide what the rules are, and often make up their own rules. Here in KK it is 3 months before and 3 months afterwards - because that is what they decided.

Yep - I think all Expats should quit using Bangkok Bank - they are clearly insane in what they are doing.

Another house visit was an absolute deal breaker for me too - unbelievable. Following your advice I am going to switch to the income method next year and then use it in the following year for all extensions. Then if/when we return to Australia (for the end game) there will be need to take account of money being ever locked into the account again, and we can draw down as much as we like before leaving. Thanks for that information about leaving while under consideration - makes sense - people just gotta hope the IO at Swampy does not think like the one I spoke to in Rayong.

I got that list from KK Immigration and the Officer stated that the money must be in the account for 3 months prior to the date of application and you must prove that with a bank statement. The link I provided to the Samut Prakan Immigration list also states clearly 3 months. I know the official rules might be 2 months - but the Provincial Offices of the Immigration Police are 'independent' and it is clear they are in some Provinces they are stating 3 months before application.