TroubleandGrumpy

(not worth responding to)

Oooops. I just looked up the record. In 1984 Reagan won 525 Votes (Mondale 13). That will never happen again.

Who are you talking to??? And what the hell are you talking about?? Are you OK?? Calm down and listen !! I said - Putin did not take power by force by declaring martial law - Zelensky did that recently and so did Hitler. I said - Putin was popular and was elected in what was seen as a 'fairly free' election (link was provided). 24 years ago !! Understand??

A modern 'twist' to the story - as with many things these days.

Could be a landslide - a day is a long time in politics and a week is eternity - but maybe a record win for GOP.

And down came a spider, Who sat down beside her, And said "whats in the bowl beetch'.

Mate - this one and Will are in my blocked list - both just trolling IMO. Transam may be a lefty, but he is real and does argue the point - sometimes.

2 weeks later ?? You believed that because you want to believe that. And Mary had a little lamb..............

They dont know where or when, because they are not thinking - they are feeling. I love Trump and they hate Trump - they will not listen to argument, nor ever think they could be wrong.

Your sexpat neighbour is where you get your world advice from?? 24 years ago when he was 'elected' - what more can I say - can you actually listen.

No answer to a straight question - as is atypical of Dems supporters - all feelings and no logic.

I think it is fair to say that the side far more likely to cause a 'civil war' is the Dems side. That is based on all the riots and protests when they reacted so violently after Clinton lost and Trump won in 2016. Plus all the Reps did was protest outside Congress and when a few idiots walked inside they caused some problems- but no street protests and violence.

Mate - this is what they 'feel' about Trump. Years of constant media lies and distortions and they believed them - every single one. The Democrats have nothing of substance to offer - so they attack Trump - and that is all Harris is doing for the last few weeks - besides saying she grew up in a middle class family. This picture sums it up perfectly.

Good God - you are incapable of being educated - no more wasting my time.

Just so you know. Take a look at the NATO boundary in 2000 and again as of 2022 when Putin invaded Ukraine. This is NATO in 1990. The Warsaw Pact members (pink) all joined NATO. This was NATO in 2022 The main reason (not the only one) Putin invaded Ukraine was that NATO had constantly ignored their 'agreement' with Russia not to expand to the East. As per this article written by a left wing news media outlet (The Guardian) one month before Russia invaded Ukraine, the constant expansion of NATO after the USSR was abolished, was a huge problem with Russia. Russia’s belief in Nato ‘betrayal’ – and why it matters today | Russia | The Guardian The 'final straw' was when Ukraine and NATO started formal negotiations for Ukraine joining NATO in January 2022 - meaning that NATO would have the ability to place nuclear and other weapons right on the Russian border. The USA and USSR nearly went to war when USSR tried to place nuclear missiles in Cuba many decades ago - same same. The hawkish military powers in USA funded and pushed NATO to expand - Russia (Putin) warned NATO and USA for many years to keep Ukraine as a 'buffer' between Russia and NATO. NATO/USA thought he was bluffing - Putin was not. And if Zelensky sends a ballistic missile into Moscow, the world will be at WW3 because Putin has said he will respond and nuclear weapons are on the table - the nuclear weapons off Russia have been on 'ready alert' since 2022. If you are silly enough to think that WW3 will be USA/NATO versus Russia - think again - China is a very close and strong ally of Russia - and so are many of the Arab States. Want to stop WW3? Elect Trump !! The Democrats are locked and loaded with Ukraine and are prepared to start WW3 with their stupidity. You think Harris is going to sort this out - or Israel? Trump is the only rational and logical choice as POTUS. Save the planet - ignore Greta - and vote for Trump !!!

You did go to school right? And you can read, right?? I said "he has 'ensured' his continued stay via electoral changes advantageous to himself" Try again buddy - you seem to not be able to read and understand words - I bet you dont listen either. Let me try to 'educate' you - something clearly lacking in your past. I said "he has 'ensured' his continued stay via electoral changes advantageous to himself" (gerrymandering) You COULD have said - 'Yes he did that AND he also had opponents/critics killed by all accounts." I WOULD then have said - "Seems very likely, but that is why he gerrymandered the elections because of the growing discontent about his actions. You COULD have then said - "He is only popular again now because he invaded Ukraine". I WOULD then have said - "Touche". Understand?? That is a logical and rational discussion and exchanges of ideas. This is NOT. Me - Trump delivered a strong economy and tried to secure the border and would have stopped Putin dead in his tracks. You - Trump is an evil orange hitler who should be in jail !!!

ROFLOL - the People of USA will decide who is POTUS - not you or me. Delusions of grandeur maybe - or are you saying Putin would be better than Trump?? You did say ANYONE - so how about Ali Hosseini Khamenei (Iran Dictator)??

OK that is enough of a first step (sort of). Now read my posts slowly and maybe you will see/hear what I actually said. Take your emotions out of it - give it a try. I am not asking you to agree - but I do want you to listen/read to the point I made and respond rationally and logically. No 'Trump is Bad' or 'Putin is Evil' emotional baggage please.

Your thinking is the one that is biased and not open to 'new facts' sunshine. Read my post/s and then read yours above - exactly when did I say Putin was now a great popular leader. Never did - you assumed that because your cognitive bias fired up those 'feelings' and you reacted emotionally. Try again and lets have a rational debate - or is that not possible with you?

More personal insults and abuse from the woke liberals - like teenagers telling chicken butt jokes. Ever wonder why your lot are so immature and have no logical reasoning (like a teenager)? It is because you have not yet 'grown up' and realised that woke liberalism is all BS.

And to think you wrote down all that in a post and believe it - unbelievable. So much personal insults and ignorance all in one post - outstanding commitment to the cause.

The grammar/spelling police have arrived !! Why are they always woke liberals??

You think whatever the MSM and Dems tell you - deluded so much you cannot see a point. It was 24 years ago when Putin was elected and he was very popular - he did not 'take over' like Hitler.

I am not a supporter of either Putin or Zelensky - BUT:- Putin’s First Election, March 2000 | National Security Archive (gwu.edu) Vladimir Putin’s first election as president of Russia 24 years ago was “reasonably free and fair,” according to a declassified U.S. Embassy message from Moscow, one of ten documents on Russia’s 2000 presidential race published today by the National Security Archive at George Washington University. Putin drew nearly 53% of the vote in March 2000 against 29% for the second-place Communist candidate, thus winning without a runoff. The same Communist had amassed 40% in the 1996 presidential elections against Boris Yeltsin, who had appointed Putin prime minister in August 1999 and then acting president on New Year’s Eve 1999. The Embassy analysis concluded that Putin was genuinely popular, with “spectacular” increases in approval ratings in the fall of 1999, primarily because of his tough, militarized response to Chechen terrorists who had invaded neighboring Dagestan and allegedly bombed apartment buildings in Moscow and elsewhere. Your delusional views of Putin's start as Leader of Russia are from the US/Western propaganda against Russia. I am not saying that he is a 'good guy' - but your claim he 'took power' like Hitler did, is a sad reflection of the ignorance of people like yourself about the truth. Putin was elected because the years after the dissolution of the USSR had resulted in massive economic and social problems in Russia. That he has 'ensured' his continued stay via electoral changes advantageous to himself, is without doubt true - I think they call it 'gerrymandering' in USA.