nauseus

I've told you twice now where that quote came from. Now go though the last couple of pages... very slowly.. then let me know the answer. It is there.

An empty void more like. Her only chance is to flip over.

OMG, Jack Nicholson! That makes me Tom Cruise. ????

I directed you to the post by Eric already. Your mind is the one in the woods. He said: "Laura Ingraham telling listeners to turn a page on Trump and move pass him for next election". Now that is untrue. And that's it.

I already did. She was not telling anyone to do anything.

Try relaying the truth much better.

She was not telling anyone to do anything however you spin it.

Her future plans were to return to Congress! Of course it matters.

You are making things up - Ingraham did not tell listeners to turn a page on Trump, or turn anything ese. Implied, implying? Cods.

Try watching the VDO to listen to what she actually said instead of quoting this rhetorical wishful thinking

Read back - it's not far - Eric's post is misleading and incorrect because Ingraham did not tell listeners to turn a page on Trump.

She didn't่. Take care.

Ah well. Not so much the slayer but the slain now.............. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62569056

Hmmm,

Certain similarities I suppose.

A fair judge of course.

Quite a foul post.

The cultish behaviour, majority of bias and prejudgment comes from the usual pack of obvious anti Trump posters on here. Say what you want but don't try to dictate to me what I care about. I am prepared to wait for this all to unravel - and I wish everyone else was too - there are still far too many unknowns and conflicts of information about this FBI raid for anyone to know enough to make a fair conclusion but there are too many in a mad rush to get the noose ready, just like a lynch mob. Now, if it comes about that Trump is charged with a crime that is punishable and if he goes to trial where he actually receives a fair hearing and judgement, then I won't have a problem with that.

I'm a supporter of fair hearings. If Trump has broken any laws and goes to trial, then a fair one is all anyone can ask for. The problem is that this anti-Trumpery has been going on relentlessly for 6+ years with high visibility and prejudice to the point that even some Democrats seem not trust their own government agencies now. As part of this so-called "bipartisan" J6 hearing committee, Kinzinger should be keeping his verdicts and "creepy" opinions to himself, at least until his kangaroo court is over and dismantled. Maybe he's noisy now because he knows he's jobless and even quit last Friday without even contesting his seat. Cheyney is most likely gone too.

Looks like it's your turn to get real.

All sounds like a near perfect description of the democrats.

Funny. That's what I said!

Of course not. We all know what the obsession is here and who feels the need for it to last forever.

Hillary I guess?

So don't film it. Aircraft can be converted to unflyable wrecks quite quickly and easily. Armour with sabotaged engines and guns is quite useless after only a little time, expense and effort. All better than leaving them intact for any enemy. These practices are well recorded in military history and a common part of military training. I'm surprised that a military man like you seems unaware of this.