4 hours ago, melvinmelvin said:

failing to land a deal will reflect pretty bad on both parties

 

 

Especially for those who claimed it would be the easiest deal in history, negotiated over an afternoon tea, having the cake and eating it. 
 

I still think there will be some sort of barebones deal, followed be an extension. But I wouldn’t mind no deal, so that Brexiteers get the full damage of their nonsense. 

50 minutes ago, sucit said:

To sum up everything you have said, you want people to have a filter on their media because they are not thoughtful enough to think for themselves.

People can freely decide what media they consume. So can media freely decide what they put on their websites. That’s called a free press. 
 

You are the one who wants to dictate. Not me. You want to dictate media what to put on their websites. That’s fascism. 

50 minutes ago, sucit said:

 

In your view it would be fine to just black out the next state of the union address because a select few didn't like what the president was saying.

See above. It’s not up to a government what the media has to report. That would be fascism. 

50 minutes ago, sucit said:

Self realize how ridiculous this is, not for me but for yourself. 

I don’t care what you find ridiculous. 
 

50 minutes ago, sucit said:

 

You brought up Hitler, your way is the Hitler way. That is a very Hitler like policy to just control what people hear and what they don't. 

Except that you’re the one whose advocating that a government can dictate what the media should report. Whereas I am clearly in favor of the opposite. 

50 minutes ago, sucit said:

Another glaring misread you have that is so obvious, when the president starts behaving like a moron and making unfounded claims, he looks..... like a moron (that is how that works). Filtering the content helps him. So, you have everything exactly backwards. Maybe your intentions are good, but if you want people to dislike Trump, SHOW them what he is doing, don't hide it. 

That’s up to everyone themselves to decide. I’m not telling CNN, Twitter or Breitbart what to put on their websites. YOU are the one who’s saying it should be the government dictating what they put on there. 
 

50 minutes ago, sucit said:

Point blank, would it be ok to black out the next state of the union?

See above. It’s up to every website owner what to put on their website. I’m not going to put it on mine for sure. 
 

50 minutes ago, sucit said:

If you answer yes, you are wrong, if you answer no, I am right. So, there ya go. But, If you can't see you are wrong there is really no helping you. 

I don’t care what you find right or wrong. Up to you. 

7 minutes ago, J Town said:

No, that's never been true. More people voted for Hillary in 2016 and far more voted for Biden so far this election.

Biden got the most votes any presidential candidate ever got. Trump got the second-most votes any presidential candidate ever got. However this election ends (and every sane, decent human being can only hope Biden wins), it is shocking that so many people voted for a fascist with the brain of rotten Hot Dog. It is obvious that a very large part of this country consists of <deleted>-poor, uneducated rednecks, and that’s something that you cannot fix in a 4-8 year term. The country is broken. 

48 minutes ago, Grumpy one said:

The news will become very boring after trump is kicked out of the white house.

No more morning rants.

What will we all do for entertainment 

To be honest, that’s likely part of why those 68 million uneducated poor folks vote for him. When you’re a loser with nothing to do in your trailer park home, you find enjoyment in someone creating trouble. 

15 minutes ago, Kelsall said:

Yes, indeed.  Fortunately Trump is a fighter and is calling the Dems on their fraud.

Not surprised that Trump supporters consider it “fraud” when people exercise their right to vote. 

14 minutes ago, JensenZ said:

a state that is a crucial swing state.

Even more important that everyone’s vote gets counted. 

3 minutes ago, JensenZ said:

No, all ballots should all be there to count before the voting stops (at 7pm).

No, according to the law they don’t have to be there before the voting stops. 
 

3 minutes ago, JensenZ said:

It's a big mess

No, they just have to get counted. Hardly a mess. 
 

3 minutes ago, JensenZ said:

and Trump is doing the right thing.

He’s trying every dirty trick as expected to steal the election and violate the people’s right to vote. If you find that “the right thing” be it. 

2 minutes ago, JensenZ said:

In Pennsylvania they came in with piles of mail ballots after midnight.

Good, so they can get counted. That’s what should happen with votes, no? 

23 minutes ago, vogie said:

all we have so far is a tired out slogan followed by an insult

I think you actually started with the insult followed by the slogan; read your comment again:

Quote

the defective dictatorship of the federal EU and is nothing to do with free trade but to still wants to exert power over the UK

48 minutes ago, sucit said:

Seriously, why not just leave the tweets there.

Because enough people are uneducated losers who will believe it. 
 

48 minutes ago, sucit said:

If he is wrong he looks like an idiot.

almost 70 million voted for him it seems. 
 

48 minutes ago, sucit said:

Blows me away how complicated they make this.

I don’t think deleting something is complicated. They probably have a standard process for that by now; wouldn’t be surprised if it had his name. 
 

48 minutes ago, sucit said:

People can say stuff, that is life. Deal with it. 

Websites can delete stuff, that is life. Deal with it. 

2 hours ago, wombat said:

so much for free speech

You gotta do your homework what free speech means. No one’s right to free speech was impacted. 

2 hours ago, wombat said:

and leaving it up to the individual to decide what is fact or fiction.

“what is fact or fiction” is not decided by an individual, but determined by reality. 

17 minutes ago, robblok said:

Im actually also surprised by how popular the guy still is. It certainly makes me question a large part of the US voters. 

The glamour of Silicon Valley, Ivy League and Wall Street is just a nice facade. In reality, the US is a broken banana republic where large parts of the population are such <deleted> poor,  uneducated losers that they vote for dumbest and most corrupt piece of human on the ballot paper. Think about it, this is not the case of some remote village where only one person is on the ballot or no free elections are being held. They actually had a choice, and almost 70 million voted for a corrupt racist who’s barely fit to run a Hot Dog stand. At this point, I’m not sure whether I should be sad or laugh about those trailer park boys. 

2 minutes ago, vogie said:

Where would remainers be without 'Twitter' oh I know, in the real world. 

The source is the leave campaign if you haven’t noticed, not “remainers”. It says “Vote Leave” and it has that little blue icon showing it’s the official account: 

8 hours ago, Loiner said:

Leaving the Single Market was never part of 'Project Fear', except for the Remainer votes. For Leavers, getting out of FOM and ECJ etc rules of Single Market  was the reason to Brexit.

1 hour ago, luckyluke said:

The Express :

Brexit LIVE: Furious fishermen lash out at UK's huge compromise - 'We'll give you HELL!'

BORIS Johnson has been warned any perception he is "selling out" the industry in an EU trade deal will prompt a furious response from British fishermen.

How will an industry of the size of Harrods create “a furious response” and “give you HELL”? Going on a mackerel strike? 

3 minutes ago, david555 said:

Strong rumors appear …..BJ could be "saved and excused" by C19 conditions as excuse for …………..?

Another extension because circumstances  ….. but just rumors ????

There will likely be a deal. A bad one for both sides, but one that’s better than a no-deal, at least in terms of economy and businesses (not necessarily in terms of Brexiteer ideology). Depending on the scope of such agreement, it could also be likely that some sort of “implementation period” will have to be agreed. 
 

1 hour ago, vinny41 said:

Not possible to remain as the UK has already left the EU 31st January 2020

No according to Brexiteers here, for whom Brexit only truly will ever have happened if...

1 hour ago, vinny41 said:

remainers now known as rejoiners want Brexit to fail hence in their view a No deal is better than a deal

...there’s no deal, or only one that has so many conditions that it’s unrealistic. 
 

6 minutes ago, vogie said:

time to face up to reality I'm afraid.

Fantasy: You claiming the leave campaign did not say the UK would stay in the single market. 

Reality:

14 minutes ago, vogie said:

Why are you showing quotes from people who have very little relevence to the outcome of the vote,did you forget Bob the Butchers quote or Norman the News Agent.

Why are you talking about Cameron when the discussion is about the Leave Campaign? Did you forget Bob the Butchers quote or Norman the News Agent?